<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>0 -- In These Times</title>
		<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/archives/tags/campaign+finance/</link>
		<description>In These Times features award-winning investigative reporting about corporate malfeasance and government wrongdoing, insightful analysis of national and international affairs, and sharp cultural criticism about events and ideas that matter.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<generator>Expression Engine</generator>
		<managingEditor>jessica@inthesetimes.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>seamus@inthesetimes.com</webMaster>
	
		<item>
			<title>Power to the Public Financing</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3138/power_to_the_public_financing/</link>
			<description>In the aftermath of Jack Abramoff, a new clamor for clean money and clean elections can be heard nationwide. Finally, some legislators are offering more than cosmetic solutions. In March, Sens. Dick Durbin (D&#45;Ill.) and Arlen Specter (R&#45;Pa.) introduced the Fair Elections Now Act. Modeled after existing election&#45;financing systems in states like Arizona and Maine, the legislation outlines a new system for financing congressional campaigns with public funds. With a proposed $2.8 billion for each two&#45;year election cycle, Durbin&apos;s bill aims to reward candidates who spend time with their constituents, and not golfing or dining with deep&#45;pocketed lobbyists. In the House, Reps. John Tierney (D&#45;Mass.) and Raul Grijalva (D&#45;Ariz.) introduced a similar measure, the Clean Money Clean Elections Act (H.R.&#8230;</description>
			<category>campaign finance
elections</category>
			<author>Susan J. Douglas</author>
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Kissing up to K Street</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3235/kissing_up_to_k_street/</link>
			<description>In 1903, journalist William Riordan published a series of interviews with George Washington Plunkitt, who was probably the most famous leader of New York&apos;s Tammany Hall (other than Boss Tweed himself). During a discussion of Lincoln Steffens&apos; then&#45;new book The Shame of the Cities, Plunkitt told Riordan that Steffens &quot;can&apos;t see no difference between honest graft and dishonest graft and consequent, he gets things all mixed up.&quot; The same thing could be said for our Congress. &quot;Honest graft,&quot; said Plunkitt, is when &quot;the politician looks after his own interests, the organization&apos;s interests and the people&apos;s interests all at the same time.&quot; Dishonest graft, by contrast, is engaged in by &quot;looters&quot; who &quot;go in for themselves alone without considering their organization&#8230;</description>
			<category>campaign finance
congress</category>
			<author>Susan J. Douglas</author>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>