<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Capitalism -- In These Times</title>
		<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/archives/tags/capitalism/</link>
		<description>In These Times features award-winning investigative reporting about corporate malfeasance and government wrongdoing, insightful analysis of national and international affairs, and sharp cultural criticism about events and ideas that matter.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<generator>Expression Engine</generator>
		<managingEditor>jessica@inthesetimes.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>seamus@inthesetimes.com</webMaster>
	
		<item>
			<title>The Ambiguous Legacy of &#145;68</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3751/the_ambiguous_legacy_of_68/</link>
			<description>In 1968 Paris, one of the best&#45;known graffiti messages on the city&apos;s walls was &quot;Structures do not walk on the streets!&quot; In other words, the massive student and workers demonstrations of &apos;68 could not be explained in the terms of structuralism, as determined by the structural changes in society, as in Saussurean structuralism. French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan&apos;s response was that this, precisely, is what happened in &apos;68: structures did descend onto the streets. The visible explosive events on the streets were, ultimately, the result of a structural imbalance. There are good reasons for Lacan&apos;s skeptical view. As French scholars Luc Boltanski and Eve Chiapello noted in 1999&apos;s The New Spirit of Capitalism, from the &apos;70s onward, a new form of&#8230;</description>
			<category>capitalism
revolution</category>
			<author>Susan J. Douglas</author>
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Saying &#147;No Deal&#148; to This New Deal</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3951/saying_no_deal_to_this_new_deal/</link>
			<description>The marriage of American capitalism and democracy has always been a Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee affair &#45;&#45; stormy and erratic since its hasty wedding. But during the debate over a Wall Street bailout this week, we watched that matrimonial knot unwind into a tangled tale of terror. As a financial crisis became a political panic, capitalism murdered democracy (ironically, while pursuing a vaguely socialist bailout). Only, unlike a typical horror story, the dead body wasn&apos;t hidden, it was dumped in the nation&apos;s public square. The fiasco started, like most, with unreasonable demands. Under threat of financial meltdown, capitalism&apos;s corporate lobbyists asked our democracy to forsake its usual deliberations and hand over $700 billion of taxpayer money in less than&#8230;</description>
			<category>capitalism
financial crisis
Wall Street</category>
			<author>Susan J. Douglas</author>
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Americans Unwilling to Face Reality</title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3998/americans_unwilling_to_face_reality/</link>
			<description>It&apos;s not as though no one saw it coming. Here&apos;s the economist Michael Hudson, writing in the May 2006 issue of Harper&apos;s magazine: &quot;The reality is that, although home ownership may be a wise choice for many people, this particular real&#45;estate bubble has been carefully engineered to lure home buyers into circumstances detrimental to their own best interests. . . . The bubble will burst, and when it does, the people who thought they would be living the easy life of a landlord will soon find that what they really signed up for was the hard servitude of debt serfdom.&quot; Other commentators, including Warren Buffet, said similar things about the derivatives market. It was prescient stuff for anybody who cared&#8230;</description>
			<category>economy
labor
deregulation
capitalism</category>
			<author>Susan J. Douglas</author>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>