<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Regulations -- In These Times</title>
		<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/archives/tags/regulations/</link>
		<description>In These Times features award-winning investigative reporting about corporate malfeasance and government wrongdoing, insightful analysis of national and international affairs, and sharp cultural criticism about events and ideas that matter.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<generator>Expression Engine</generator>
		<managingEditor>jessica@inthesetimes.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>seamus@inthesetimes.com</webMaster>
	
		<item>
			<title>No New Year Resolutions?</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
			<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3448/no_new_year_resolutions/</link>
			<description>The U.S. Securities &amp;amp; Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed changes that could prevent many shareholders from raising issues of social and environmental corporate responsibility. Over the past few decades, shareholder resolutions have played a significant role in persuading major companies to improve their labor, environmental and corporate governance practices. In 2004, Coca&#45;Cola executives backed a shareholder resolution that led the company to invest in HIV prevention in Africa. The measure passed with flying colors. Over the past 15 years, a series of shareholder resolutions have helped force Nike to monitor labor conditions in its international supply chain. And shareholder resolutions have persuaded corporations, including Tyco and American Electric Power, to cut back on greenhouse gas emissions. But the SEC has&#8230;</description>
			<category>corporations
regulations</category>
			<author>Susan Levine</author>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>