<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Revolution -- In These Times</title>
		<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/archives/tags/revolution/</link>
		<description>In These Times features award-winning investigative reporting about corporate malfeasance and government wrongdoing, insightful analysis of national and international affairs, and sharp cultural criticism about events and ideas that matter.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<generator>Expression Engine</generator>
		<managingEditor>jessica@inthesetimes.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>seamus@inthesetimes.com</webMaster>
	
		<item>
			<title>The Ambiguous Legacy of &#145;68</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3751/the_ambiguous_legacy_of_68/</link>
			<description>In 1968 Paris, one of the best&#45;known graffiti messages on the city&apos;s walls was &quot;Structures do not walk on the streets!&quot; In other words, the massive student and workers demonstrations of &apos;68 could not be explained in the terms of structuralism, as determined by the structural changes in society, as in Saussurean structuralism. French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan&apos;s response was that this, precisely, is what happened in &apos;68: structures did descend onto the streets. The visible explosive events on the streets were, ultimately, the result of a structural imbalance. There are good reasons for Lacan&apos;s skeptical view. As French scholars Luc Boltanski and Eve Chiapello noted in 1999&apos;s The New Spirit of Capitalism, from the &apos;70s onward, a new form of&#8230;</description>
			<category>capitalism
revolution</category>
			<author>Susan J. Douglas</author>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>