<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Veterans -- In These Times</title>
		<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/archives/tags/veterans/</link>
		<description>In These Times features award-winning investigative reporting about corporate malfeasance and government wrongdoing, insightful analysis of national and international affairs, and sharp cultural criticism about events and ideas that matter.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<generator>Expression Engine</generator>
		<managingEditor>jessica@inthesetimes.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>seamus@inthesetimes.com</webMaster>
	
		<item>
			<title>Dereliction of Duty</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			<link>http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3864/dereliction_of_duty/</link>
			<description>At a town hall meeting in Denver in early July, a Vietnam veteran asked presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R&#45;Ariz.) why he had opposed increasing healthcare for veterans whenever Congress had taken up the issue over the past six years. McCain virtually ignored the man&#39;s question, dissembling his opposition to an updated GI Bill for veterans. After the questioner challenged McCain&#39;s response, the senator reacted as he usually does when queried beyond his comfort level: He got visibly angry. Because McCain is running for president almost solely on his biography as a war hero, he can&#39;t &#45;&#45; and won&#39;t &#45;&#45; allow the slightest doubt to linger about his dedication to soldiers both past and present. It didn&#39;t matter that the&#8230;</description>
			<category>veterans
McCain
healthcare</category>
			<author>Grace Lee Boggs</author>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>