Help In These Times raise $5,000 in two weeks! Donate now!
Help this website survive! Donate to In These Times now!
PrintDiscuss
Views » September 13, 2004

Black Muslims and the Sudan

By Salim Muwakkil

The situationin Darfur is forcing a focus on an issue the Muslim world has tended to avoid: race.
Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller

It has taken a genocide in Darfur, where hundreds of thousands have been killed in a brutal campaign of ethnic cleansing and countless more continue to die in disease-ridden refugee camps, to force influential segments of the black activist community to put aside their differences and acknowledge a long history of ongoing atrocities in the Sudan.

For years, some black activists have charged the Islamic government of Sudan with supporting Arab militias that raid Christian and traditionalist areas of southern Sudan and force their black African captives into slavery. Others argued that those charges were manufactured primarily to justify Western intervention in the region.

Initially, the disagreement was centered in the Black Nationalist community and, to put it simply, was divided between nationalists who were Muslim and those who were Pan-Africanists. Many Muslim nationalists believed the charges of slavery were fabricated for the purpose of anti-Islamic propaganda. But Pan-African nationalists found more than a grain of truth in the charges and pushed the issue into the public light.

The apparent sectarian character of the militia raids eventually energized various Christian groups and they began mobilizing in opposition to the Sudanese government. The ardent support of these often right-wing groups further clouded the issue for many black activists who suspected their new allies had ulterior motives.

Thus, the effort to bring attention to the issue of slavery in the Sudan was crippled. But a dedicated group of pan-African nationalists continued to push the cause and consistently condemned the Sudan’s Islamic regime; some blamed prominent black Muslims for helping to keep the issue off the table.

“Black Muslims were reluctant to criticize the Islamist government in the Sudan, which is based in the north in Khartoum, because of their religious and other ties,” says Nate Clay, talk-show host, newspaper publisher and one of the most vocal members of this pan-Africanist group.

Clay is gratified that so many black activists, politicians and celebrities have been willing to get arrested in front of the Sudanese embassy in Washington D.C. in the last few months to protest the atrocities in Darfur. But he also is a little disgusted.

“What really bothers me about this sudden flash of consciousness is that they’ve only become interested in the Sudan in the face of the white media’s interest in the issue,” he says. “Where were they when the Sudanese government and its Arab militia were busy killing 2 million black Africans in the southern Sudan?”

He believes African-American leaders were intimidated by black Muslims—in particular, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. “Farrakhan knows about this and I’ve heard him condemn Arab racism. But he talks out of both sides of his mouth. I think he has become too dependent on Arab money.”

But the latest conflict in Darfur pits Muslim against Muslim. As Eric Reeves reported in the September 20 issue of In These Times (See “Deathly Silence,” p. 8), members of the tribal groups most affected by the ethnic cleansing are Muslim, as are the government and its Arab militia (the Janjaweed). Although the government reportedly got involved to suppress political opposition, the conflict now seems to be driven by ethnic, or at least cultural, animosities. Many members of the Janjaweed are dark-skinned Africans who identify with Arab culture. They would more accurately be called Arabized militia.

Since the religious component has been neutralized, several African-American Islamic groups have joined the protest against the Sudanese government’s treatment of the Muslim tribal groups that don’t identify themselves as Arabs. In fact, one group—Project Islamic H.O.P.E.—has called for Islamic governments and organizations to protest Khartoum’s action in Darfur.

“These Arab and Muslim leaders seek out our support on issues like Palestinian rights, religious racial profiling of civil liberties violations and American treatment of Islamic countries, but these Muslim leaders aren’t saying anything about the genocide of the African population in the Sudan,” says Najee Ali, founder of Islamic H.O.P.E. The issue also sparked some heated discussions at the recent convention of the American Society of Muslims, the largest group of indigenous Muslims in the country.

The situation in Darfur is forcing a focus on an issue the Muslim world has tended to avoid: race. And although the Western media’s depiction of the current conflict as one between Arab and African groups is too simplistic, there is a well-documented history of anti-black Arab bias in the region that has seldom been explored.

So, while Darfur has closed gaps between black activists, it has opened one between Muslims. Too bad it required the tragedy of another African genocide to provoke a conversation about Arab racism that is long past overdue.

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Salim Muwakkil is a senior editor of In These Times, where he has worked since 1983. He is the host of "The Salim Muwakkil" show on WVON, Chicago's historic black radio station, and he wrote the text for the book HAROLD: Photographs from the Harold Washington Years.

More information about Salim Muwakkil
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    i think that this “war” is stupid
    it is inhuman and unethical on how they are going about on killing thousands of innocent people!
    i am only 14 years old and i even understand what is right and wrong and this is beyond wrong…

    Posted by Essia on Sep 14, 2004 at 2:46 PM

    The war between Black and Arab culture is not new.  It’s no secret that Arabs hate Black people and if they can’t pimp us then they want to eliminate us.  Just go to any Black neighborhood and visit one of the Arab owned greasy spoon fast food stands, or corner grocery, liquor or dollar stores and observe how hateful and disrespectful they are to their patrons (especially the women).  You’ll also find that the vast majority of their patrons are low income Blacks, steet people, gangbangers and “get-over” ghetto Black folks trading LINK and WIC benefits for cash.  Working/middle class Black folks avoid Arabs and patronize places that actually hire Black people.  The differences in those who patronize their businesses and those that don’t illustrate the division in many inner city communities that keep them from forming the cohesiveness needed to demand government services from City Hall needed to improve quality of life.  Arabs are running interference to keep any kind Black unity from being established and are forming an alliance with vulnerable Black folks who would do their bidding against Blacks that see Arabs for who they really are.

    Posted by theloneous on Sep 14, 2004 at 3:34 PM

    This is an interesting and necesary article. As an as Afro-American let me urge to inform our people about the situation in Mauretania. The arabs there do quite similar things to the blacks.In fact a slightly veiled slavery still exists there. However, it receives no coverage.In about 1992 after a failed coup blacks were driven across the Senegal river into Senegal despite their Mauretanian citizenship. Hopefully,we will become a little more honest in the future.

    Posted by wallace nixon on Sep 14, 2004 at 4:35 PM

    Wow. theloneous, you spout racism big time! Arabs hate negros? Is that all Arabs, or only the ones that have to deal with the “gang bangers” - who probably deserve whatever diss’ing they get? It must be a good time to be so racist against this group now, they are rather unpopular, kinda like the negros in the 50’s in the US.

    Funny, but where i live people are still individuals. Here we consider each of them by their merits - not their ethnic group. But there is a huge downside to this - it requires one to think. .  .

    Posted by Ahab the Arab on Sep 14, 2004 at 6:24 PM

    Yes, Theloneous.. that was pretty ass-backwards of you.

    Posted by g-love on Sep 14, 2004 at 8:19 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 39 posts.

Appeared in the October 11, 2004 Issue
Also by Salim Muwakkil
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS