An Occupy Wall Street demonstrator in New York City. Frustrated with big banks, Occupiers have advocated moving deposits into smaller credit unions. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Web Only// Views » November 18, 2011
Anger Sowing Seeds of a New Consumer Movement
A new study suggests consumer rage against businesses is at an all-time high.
We're remembering that being a patron comes with power—and we're finally getting mad enough to use it.
As we all know, America is angry. Really angry. To put it in pop culture terms, we’ve moved from the vaguely inspiring agita of Peter Finch in Network to the wild-eyed, primal-scream rage of Sam Kinison in Back to School.
When we pay attention to politics, we get peeved at Congress and the presidential candidates. When we tune into sports, we’re annoyed with squabbling players and owners. When we turn on the news, we fume at the smug pundits. And when it comes to the economy, we’re in a tizzy at big corporations.
Most of this indignation is nothing new; it is atavistic fury expressed in the modern vernacular. Yet, one strand of our anger–the kind directed at big business–may be truly novel, as our chagrin is no longer just that ancient animosity toward excessive corporate power. Instead, it has also become a personal disdain toward firms we deal with on a daily basis.
This is the key finding of the latest report from the Center for Services Leadership at Arizona State University. Its findings show that after years of rising anger, consumer rage has reached an all-time high.
Back in 2004, ASU’s researchers theorized that such apoplexy was an outgrowth of affluence. “Households simply have more products and services today, and thus more points of contact, increasing our chances that we will have a problem,” they wrote.
But, of course, 2004 was a comparatively prosperous time. Today, by contrast, recession-battered consumers have access to fewer products and services and yet are angrier at companies, meaning the sentiment likely reflects a response to deeper trends.
One of those is a decline in craftsmanship in the era of free trade and offshore production. With America now awash in foreign wares, we’ve imported the developing world’s lax regulatory standards and, thus, its lower product quality. That means poorly constructed furniture, malfunctioning electronics and all the other shoddiness that drives customers nuts.
Another maddening trend is the corporate sector’s shift from long-term customer care to short-term predation. Though firms have always tried to make quick money off clients, the intensity of this recession, coupled with investors’ insatiable demand for quarterly profit growth, has prompted unprecedented bill-padding, corner-cutting and inflexibility. Today’s typical air travel experience epitomizes the dynamic: You get hit with a baggage charge, shoved into an ever-smaller seat and then stranded in airport purgatory because you missed your connection. With this kind of experience being replicated in everything from debit card fees to interminable customer-service wait times, it’s no wonder we’re ticked off.
Finally, there’s what Mother Jones magazine calls “The Great Speedup,” whereby downsized companies are forcing their remaining employees to do more work at a faster pace than ever. While this means our workforce is generating more output, it also means that output often becomes less satisfying to the end user. So, sure, your energy company’s electrician may be servicing more homes, but he’s also more error-prone and no longer maintains a customer-friendly demeanor–because he’s being run ragged.
All of this is no doubt responsible for a spike in self-destructive temper tantrums. However, there is an upside: The angst is resurrecting the notion of consumer activism. And that’s a big deal.
Recent headlines tell this story. From moving deposits out of big banks to a mass abandonment of Netflix, customers are suddenly channeling the old Ralph Nader zeitgeist. We’re remembering that being a patron comes with power–and we’re finally getting mad enough to use it.
If that ends up bringing back a lasting consumer movement in America, then all the heartburn and stress of being a mistreated customer will have been worth it.
ABOUT THIS AUTHOR
David Sirota, an In These Times senior editor and syndicated columnist, is a bestselling author whose book Back to Our Future: How the 1980s Explain the World We Live In Now—Our Culture, Our Politics, Our Everything was released in 2011. Sirota, whose previous books include The Uprising and Hostile Takeover, hosts the morning show on AM760 in Denver. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com or follow him on Twitter @davidsirota.

SAVE 53% OFF
Reader Comments
I have much less faith in ‘consumer power’. This so-called power has been touted as a counterbalance to corporate erosion of good and services in the past, many times, but look where we are now.
The point about shoddy developing-world goods seems to have been used as a contrast to ‘well-made’ American goods. Local made goods are always better for the home workforce and economy, but America has e.g. been making ‘shoddy’ cars for several decades. The computer I’m using to type was almost certainly manufactured in China or Korea and it’s of exceptional quality. Shoddiness comes with mass production, not the country of origin.
Posted by Roger van de Velde on Nov 21, 2011 at 2:33 PM
A general consumer boycott is what is required. As much as possible we should strive to be self-sufficient and reject superfluous, luxury and just plain harmful and unnecessary products. We should create cottage industries that are rooted in the community. Here are a bunch of tips on how to save money and reject consumerism:
http://prolecenter.wordpress.com/category/consumer-council/
Posted by Joseph Waters on Nov 22, 2011 at 10:07 AM
While I have little doubt about Mr. Sirota’s good intentions and am sympathetic to the import of this article, this article is so thinly sourced as to cast the evidence behind the writer’s assertions in doubt. The “latest report from the Center for Services Leadership at Arizona State University” is alluded to only once, with no analysis of the “key finding,” the study’s method, its sample or anything else. When was the report published? What was its title? How might readers verify for themselves the accuracy of these claims? Every other citation in this piece barely rises above the level of hearsay. Please, keep the reporting based in some objective standards of reference so that we can rest assured in the validity of our causes.
Posted by Bill DiNome on Nov 26, 2011 at 6:42 AM
I can see what this is relying on. As circumstances look like at the very moment we debate on this topic, the online business seem to work out best, while the other small business are striving to cope with the recession. Consumer`s needs stay the same, while their affordability decreased. Sometimes it`s easier for them to access Boise classifieds services instead of paying for consultancy services of any kind. Everyone chooses the most convenient way of solving his problem.
Posted by daria spencer on Feb 26, 2012 at 6:41 AM
With all the budget shrinking and the service quality becoming lower, it`s pretty hard for businesses to resist on the market, I can understand this. On the other hand, it`s not quite pleasant for the clients either, for all of us who pay good money to purchase all kinds of products. Luckily, there`s this option still standing for us, shopping on the internet. As all of you know, quality products come cheaper. I recently bought had this 2N2222 order for some computer parts and I was amazed how affordable they are.
Posted by finn hewey on Feb 26, 2012 at 6:51 AM
Posting Security