Culture » November 8, 2004

Better Waits Than Never

By Kevin Canfield

Tom Waits’ long career has been marked by an aversion to explicitly political music. Dim light bulbs and graveyards, rifles that ring out at dawn, mules and very tall men, old dogs, old people, Oldsmobiles—all have been celebrated in Waits’ songs. Never, though, has the eccentric and impossibly rugged-voiced singer waded into unabashed political commentary.

Which is why it’s stunning to realize that Waits’ new record, Real Gone, contains what is surely (for my money, at least) the most essential song inspired by the war in Iraq. Even that may be selling it short. “Day After Tomorrow” is not the best anti-war song ever written (that honor, again, for my money, goes to Bob Dylan’s “Masters of War”) but if I’m assembling a double album of political-war songs, Waits’ entry definitely makes the cut. (The song also appears on the Barsuk Records recently released Future Soundtrack for America.)

A sort of audio journal told from the perspective of a soldier whose tour in Iraq is coming to a close, “Tomorrow” opens with the unnamed narrator getting some mail from home. He’s a Midwestern kid—raised, he tells the listener, in northern Illinois—and has managed to hold on to some of his boyish naïvete. “I still believe that there’s gold/At the end of the world,” sings Waits as he begins to sketch his character. The soldier’s spirits are buoyed by the knowledge that he’ll soon be boarding a plane; he’s due to arrive in America in just a couple days.

Accompanied by only a pair of slow guitars, Waits continues: The song’s young enlistee is fed up with the drudgeries and dangers of wartime service. He misses cleaning up the yard in autumn and clearing snow from the driveway. He longs for his girlfriend.

Waits will be 55 in December and has been making largely uncategorizable records for 30 years. Yet his uncanny empathy for his protagonist makes it feel as if the singer himself had spent a year in Baghdad. That he understands the young man’s provincial longings, his fears, his confusion and his anger becomes clearer with every line.

With steely calm, the young soldier notes that he and his peers have been fed “lies” since the start of the war, that the violence that surrounds him is deeply unnerving. Though we’re not told his chief reason for joining the service, whatever illusions he might have possessed have long since been shattered: “I’m not fighting for justice/I’m not fighting for freedom/I am fighting for my life and/Another day in the world here.”

Waits’ lyrics are stark and moving, but it is the way he delivers them that makes this such a powerful song. Betraying the sort of inner turmoil that reflects a standoff between resignation and idealism, Waits works his way patiently through the six-plus-minute song. He has an instinctive sense that informs his decision to linger on certain words while quickly dispatching with others. Near the very end Waits tells us that his young solider is celebrating a birthday, alone on the other side of the world. (I won’t quote the last four lines; they are perfect and should be heard, not read.) For all of his strengths, Waits every so often has written vaguely maudlin lyrics. None of that is present here.

Writing a song from the perspective of a soldier or a bystander caught in a war is not unique; it’s been done by everyone from Billy Bragg to Metallica to, most recently, Steve Earle. But it’s hard to imagine a song that does so more effectively, more sympathetically, than “Tomorrow.”

A mix of hollers, unusual sounds, idiosyncratic lyrics and thunderous percussion, the rest of Real Gone confirms that Waits is as sonically creative as ever. And “Tomorrow” reveals him to be a great political songwriter. Who knew?

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  You are trashing a good song by branding it a political commentary.  It could apply to any war, at any time, any place.  Where did you find any reference to Iraq, or that it referred to a current war??
  I hope Tom is too smart to join the political arena.

  Posted by sal on Nov 11, 2004 at 2:17 AM

  Reaction on comment by Sal posted on Nov 10:
  Given the fact that, before ‘Tomorrow’, Waits had never written any policital song, there must have been a seriously good reason for him to do so now. And he arguably couldn’t find a better reason than the war in Iraq. Now, by omitting explicit references to that war, Waits may have made the song more generally applicable to any war indeed. But that doesn’t mean the listener should refrain from reflecting on the real political background that inspired the author. Wars existed in real life before they became a part of myths and tales…

  Posted by Phil on Nov 14, 2004 at 1:43 PM

  Pretty heady stuff for the guy who used to be the lead singer of Bad English. No?

  Posted by Noril Bennett on Nov 15, 2004 at 8:53 PM

  Re:  Phils Nov 14 post
  The assumption that it was politics and not war that inspired the lyrics is not valid, at least not until we hear from the Man. War is hell, worth writing about; politics is BS…..

  Posted by sal on Nov 16, 2004 at 3:43 AM

  This post is to Noril Bennett: Just to let you know, you’re a little mixed up. JON WAITE was the singer of Bad English, Tom Waits is a completely different (and infinitely more talented) guy.

  To echo some other comments here, I have been a huge Tom Waits fan for years, and this is the first time I’ve heard him make anything close to a political statement (although he did manage to sneak in a subtle jab on Bill Clinton on “Mule Variations”). To me, this illustrates the depth of emotion that war is capable of provoking. Shock and awe, if you will… (sigh…)

  Posted by Rick S. on Nov 17, 2004 at 2:09 PM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also featured Reality Check
Bushs War Against the Military
Millenial Madness

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by Kevin Canfield

• See Dick Squirm
  New documentary chronicles legendary 1977 Frost/Nixon interviews Posted on December 24, 2008
• Comings and Goings
  Late last year, word surfaced that the pioneering alt rock band the Wedding… morePosted on February 2, 2005
• Get the Carters
  More often than not, tribute albums are irredeemable junk. Need convincing? Available for… morePosted on December 13, 2004
• Tuneful Humanism
  Here’s what I like as much as just about anything in the world:… morePosted on July 22, 2004
• Empire Burlesque
  This is a very strange time to be a Bob Dylan fan. After… morePosted on May 17, 2004