News > September 3, 2001

The Brame Game

Unions are against new NLRB candidate’s religion.

By Hans Johnson

Even as the Bush administration is erasing reforms—like ergonomics regulations aimed at preventing workplace injuries—it has desperately claimed to be moderate on labor issues. “The president is restoring the balance and the middle ground,” White House spokesman Ari Fleischer recently intoned.

Such rhetoric will continue to defy reality if Bush nominates J. Robert Brame to head the National Labor Relations Board. Brame, who served on the five-person board between 1997 and 2000 as a result of deals between the Clinton administration and staunch conservatives in the Senate, made his name as a dissenting voice whose quirky, sweeping opinions raised eyebrows. Now they are raising red flags. No mere management ally, Brame is a standard-bearer for the religious right whose ties to the obscure Christian reconstructionist movement reveal an ardent foe of regulations protecting worker safety and labor unions’ place in society.

In addition to his work on labor law, Brame serves on the board of American Vision, a Christian reconstructionist group whose mission is “the restoration of America’s biblical foundation.” Many reconstructionists interpret the Old Testament as prescribing minimal and very rigid forms of government, with churches playing key roles and workers groups playing none. The head of American Vision’s board of directors is Gary DeMar, who has advocated killing homosexuals and capital punishment for abortion providers. As longtime religious-right observer Fred Clarkson has written of reconstructionists, “They would eliminate not only democracy, but also many of its manifestations, such as labor unions, civil rights laws and public schools.”

Far more than a hobby, Brame’s reconstructionist sympathies are at the heart of his approach to questions of authority in the workplace. During his two-and-a-half-year stint on the NLRB, Brame penned strident dissents with a penchant for setting aside precedent and straitjacketing the right to unionize. There was almost no form of employer coercion that Brame didn’t deem a legitimate form of “free speech.”

• subscribe to print magazine

  First Name Last Name Home Address City State Zip Code Email

  2-year, 24-issues, $44.95 1-year, 12-issue, $24.95

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  There are no comments on this article yet. Start the discussion below.

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Member Login

Also by Hans Johnson

• Loyalty First
  Palin's selection doesn't augur well for Washington's warped nomination process
• Jumping Ship
  Citing social issues, local GOP officials are abandoning their party in droves
• California Rules!
  A Defeat for Right-Wing Activism On and Off the Bench
• Demolition Crew Butts In Where Deft Organizers Need To Tread
  
• The Next Gay Moment?
  
• Primary Importance
  For leaders of interest groups and social movements, power comes from being able to show elected officials that you know who, where, and how numerous these hell-or-high-water voters are within your ranks, and within their districts, at all times