News > November 29, 2004

The Gloves are Off

By Aaron Sarver

While the 2004 election was a disaster for most Democrats, Rep. Jan Schakowsky, a member of the Progressive Caucus, was easily reelected to her fourth term representing the 9th Congressional District in Illinois. In These Times spoke with her about the state of progressive politics.

Recently House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) has come under fire for ethical lapses involving his PAC. Why are Democrats so reluctant to hold Republicans accountable, when Republicans vehemently go after the smallest impropriety committed by a Democrat?

There’s an explicit criticism of Democrats here: That Republicans are better at this kind of smearing and negative campaigning. There’s a whole infrastructure to go after Democrats. There’s no question about it. But you’re seeing a change and that’s the important thing. You now see Nancy Pelosi on the floor raising ethical questions, calling for more action by the House. The charge against DeLay was brought by a Democrat from Texas, Chris Bell. Bell is now out of the House, a victim of the probably illegal redistricting that DeLay engaged in. I think there is a sense now that the gloves are off. We’re seriously gonna fight back.

The Republicans have literally shut down democracy in the House of Representatives, not letting Democrats into conference committees, violating, if not rules of the House, longstanding traditions of the House in terms of the minority party’s right to add amendments and participate in debate. They’ve gone as far as illegal activities—offering bribes on the floor of the House, holding votes open for three hours.

In the past we’ve thought the American people don’t really care that much about process, that it sounds whiny when you complain about it. But I think it’s really important for Democrats to not be party to this breakdown of democracy in the U.S. Congress.

You have called for an end to the ongoing genocide in Darfur, Sudan. What has the United States done to stop this humanitarian crisis?

There’s a certain irony here, at least in terms of rhetoric. The United States has probably gone further than any other nation in calling this genocide. The House of Representatives, and I was one of the leaders in this, passed a resolution calling it “genocide” when the administration was still reluctant to do so. We got the resolution passed in the U.S. Senate, so Congress was on record this summer calling it genocide.

I went with Donald Payne and John Conyers to meet with Kofi Annan the first day of the Democratic Convention. I really got the sense that one of the fallouts from this war in Iraq is that the United States has lost so much credibility it’s very hard for us to push any agenda in the United Nations. It’s like, “Well who are you to be telling us what to do?” But in the meantime, the atrocities, the human rights abuses and the scale of the humanitarian crisis continues to mount. It’s not as if there’s been a lack of clarity in what’s going on there—it’s just been slow in coming. We see repeated genocides occurring, and the world standing by, acknowledging it, naming it and still not doing enough.

Barack Obama will become only the third African-American since Reconstruction to be elected to the U.S. Senate. What has caused white voters to change their attitudes toward African-American candidates since the 1983 Chicago mayoral campaign of Harold Washington?

There is something about Barack Obama that causes people to feel, “You are the leader we’ve been waiting for.” I don’t just mean “You are the black leader we’ve been waiting for.” It’s “You are someone who represents what we want in a 21st Century candidate.”

He has found the language to connect with everyone, to inspire people, to take on the cynicism of the political arena, and speak of unity and hope. To express that we don’t have to always be pitted against each other, racially, economically, geographically, in terms of our sexual orientation. You asked “Why don’t Democrats go harder after Republicans?” and as things are I think we have needed to and may still need to. But ultimately I think the answer is to elect candidates and leaders like Barack Obama, who are going to lead us away from that, make us feel proud and good about ourselves. The people who supported Barack Obama felt a sense of pride in his primary victory and now feel good about themselves, not just good about Barack, but good about themselves to be supporting him.

To hear a longer version of this interview, visit the Web site of In These Times’ radio show, “Fire on the Prairie” (http://www.fireontheprairie.com).

• subscribe to print magazine

  First Name Last Name Home Address City State Zip Code Email

  2-year, 24-issues, $44.95 1-year, 12-issue, $24.95

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  “The gloves are off”?! Are ya ready to just go out and kick some butt now Jan? You go girl!

  Posted by Bubba on Nov 29, 2004 at 8:21 AM

  The only way that Democrats will gain some control in any of the branches of government is to garner votes. The last couple of elections has shown that a very large part of the voting public is focusing on personality or “values”. They are NOT moved by talk of important things such as economy, or foreign policy. Dems have to play the game of stupidity.
  First do NOT have a candidate from the Northeast part of the country. Thoroughly Vet the background of the candidates who want the office and withhold support of anyone with the slightest taint of less then being an angle. Preferably have a candidate that is a Protestant with a proven record of church going.
  Second be ready immediately to play dirty. Have ready smears for the opposition candidate. Play the smears over and over - too many voters believe anything that they repeatedly hear.

  Posted by birchbark1 on Nov 29, 2004 at 4:15 PM

  Yeah, maybe they could be anti-abortion, against poor people and the middle class, for lower taxes on the rich, and hate gay people.  I know!  Let’s pick a Republican for the Democratic nominee.  Brilliant!

  Posted by Mattdog on Nov 29, 2004 at 8:08 PM

  Don’t you just love it when a “progressive” says we don’t need to “feel better about ourselves” than to go after the Right?!

  Posted by Jason H. Christ on Nov 29, 2004 at 10:33 PM

  Christ, what does that “sentence” mean?

  Posted by mattdog on Nov 30, 2004 at 1:11 PM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 13 posts.

Member Login

Also by Aaron Sarver

• Kids LOL @ Navy Recruiters
  Millennials, explained Arthur Mitchell, director of strategic planning for the Navy's Accelerate Your Life campaign, are "narcissistic praise junkies" and "a somewhat alien life force"
• Creating the 21st Century Library
  The Prelinger Library eschews the Dewey Decimal and Library of Congress systems, and is organized instead by what Megan Shaw Prelinger calls "a map of my brain"
• A Win for the Coalition of Immokalee Workers
  In the face of a giant protest, McDonald's caves into farmworkers' demands for a penny per basket raise.
• Cholera and the City
  
• Witnessing Extraordinary Rendition
  Nonprofit organization Witness uses video like the new film Outlawed, to document human rights abuses worldwide.
• Tracking the CIA Torture Flights
  In their new book Torture Taxi: On the Trail of the CIA's Rendition Flights, A.C. Thompson and Trevor Paglen detail how the CIA transports detainees worldwide.