In Shanghai, Chinese demonstrators shout anti-Japan slogans.
News » May 9, 2005
Animosity in the East
Tensions flare between China and Japan
Beijing—initially, observers blamed the ferocious anti-Japanese protests that erupted on April 9 on the confluence of four controversial issues—the new textbooks in Japan that allegedly gloss over its WW II atrocities, an oil-driven territorial dispute in the Senkaku islands, Japan’s restatement of military support for Taiwan and Tokyo’s bid for membership in the U.N. Security Council.
“The coming together of all this invoked anti-Japanese feelings that are well rooted in Chinese society,” says Jin Linbo, director of Asia-Pacific Studies at the China Institute of International Studies in Beijing.
Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi’s public apology for Japan’s colonial and wartime past at the Bandung Conference in Indonesia led the Chinese government to ban further protests, and passions here subsided. But the precision with which the ostensibly impromptu protests began and stopped has led many here to see Beijing’s hand in organizing them.
“The root of the problem is that Japan has been trying in recent years to ‘normalize’ its statehood and play a greater role in international affairs and China is now trying to diminish Japan’s role in the world,” says Jing Huang, a senior fellow at the foreign policy studies program at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C.
Since the mid-’90s, Japan has attempted to shake off its post-war guilt and acquire greater political influence in the world. With China also looking to increase its global status, the two nations have been on a collision course, Jing says.
Japan has irked China by restructuring its armed forces, outplaying Beijing in several major business deals and, perhaps most critically, via Koizumi’s decision to worship at the controversial Yasukuni shrine that commemorates Japan’s war dead. For its part, Beijing has riled Tokyo by engaging in an arms buildup, drilling close to the disputed Senkaku islands, opposing Japan’s entry into the U.N. Security Council and deliberately excluding discussions of Japan’s postwar apology and behavior in Chinese textbooks and media.
Steeling attitudes on both sides is a chauvinistic nationalism that is being fanned by those in power in both countries, albeit for different reasons and in different ways.
“In Japan, after 10 years of stagnation, there is a fear that the country has peaked,” Jing says. “Many Japanese feel threatened and try to make up for this loss in confidence with excessive militaristic thinking.”
In China, a Communist Party “lacking in legitimacy because of the mistakes made during the Cultural Revolution and reform process is propping itself up using nationalist credentials,” says Wang Jianwei, chair of the political science department at the University of Wisconsin.
These tendencies have hijacked politics in Japan and China “to such an extent that it denies them rationality in decision-making and may undermine the national interest of both,” Jing says.
For Japan, which only apologized in 1995 for its actions in WWII, the current fracas is drawing attention to what many Asian nations have always considered a belated acknowledgment of their suffering during the war. The fallout might once again raise the issue of reparations that could cost Tokyo billions. The Chinese government, which signed away its right to collect punitive damages from Japan when the two countries reestablished diplomatic ties in 1972, is already supporting compensation lawsuits by Chinese citizens in Japanese courts.
But the Chinese government’s tacit support for the student protests “could come back to create even bigger problems” for it domestically, says the China Insitute’s Jin.
In a society full of pent-up frustrations, “whenever there is an outpouring of passions on the streets the government should be worried about where it will lead,” says Alan Wachman, associate professor of international politics at Tufts University. “The [Tiananmen Square] protests of spring 1989 did not emerge for the purposes they eventually came to represent, and one could see how a protest aimed at expressing irritation to Japan can spill over into other areas or be seen as license to protest by other groups.”
Already, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao’s March statement to the National People’s Congress (the country’s rubber-stamp parliament) that Japan must not be accepted into the global community until it “faces up to history” is taking the Communist Party toward thin ice.
Jin says, “It is quite difficult for China’s leadership to recognize that China also has to reflect on its history,” both domestically, where the Maoist years resulted in more than 30 million deaths, and overseas in places such as Cambodia, where Maoist China supported the Khmer Rouge as it killed nearly 1.8 million people.
Though Japan, which is trying to soothe things over with China, has still not made that argument, revenge attacks on Chinese banks and schools in Japan have started to occur.
Jing says he expects this to change soon, but can’t be sure. “Things have reached a very critical point. I’ve never seen it so bad,” he says.
ABOUT THIS AUTHOR
Jehangir Pocha is the Asia correspondent for In These Times.

SAVE 53% OFF
Reader Comments
Hmph! As long as we’re facing up to history, perhaps China’s leaders can give the necessary orders to re-write their history textbooks to give account of, say, China’s behavior in Tibet. Perhaps representatives of the Uighur people of today could contribute a chapter. We might also get useful viewpoints from some who lived through the Great Leap Forward, in which enough people died to approximate the death toll of a world war (except there was no war, only mind-boggling levels of starvation due to economics-via-propaganda).
Just goes to show that 4000 years of civilization does not necessarily result in 4000 years worth of advance toward enlightenment. Japan’s militarism was heinous (like it all is, no matter the country), but in the intervening decades they’ve made huge strides and become an example to other nations in the areas of improved quality of life for more of their citizens, disaster and humanitarian relief, brokering conflict resolution efforts, striving for a balance between technological civilizaton and environmental integrity, etc. China’s leaders wish their own record in the last 60 years was as good.
Let the damn war end, already.
Posted by Kuya on May 9, 2005 at 11:55 PM
The Japanese massacre of the Chinese people during WWII has long been over. The Japanese government’s responbilities in admitting to these atrocities has not yet happened.
“Let the damn war end, already”? Tell that to the Israelis and other Jews whose families died in Nazi death camps and see your response.
Maintain the focus on Japanese responsibility over its actions in WWII. Subsequent histories in other parts of the world or in China bears no relevance to this subject. Bringing the Tibet history in this conversation is akin to discussing Japanese treatment for Okinawans or in its support of the Iraq war.
Remember, Japan has committed the same atrocities to Koreans. These war crimes are vividly recalled by South Koreans living in a country where “they’ve made huge strides and become an example to other nations in the areas of improved quality of life for more of their citizens, disaster and humanitarian relief, brokering conflict resolution efforts, striving for a balance between technological civilizaton and environmental integrity, etc. “
Even Representative Mike Honda in the US Congress admits that Japan should take the necessary “measure” to apologize for its war crimes.
Posted by K on May 10, 2005 at 1:18 PM
Posting Security