Bill Ayers speaks out! An In These Times exclusive.

PrintDiscuss
Features » December 5, 2005

Cult of Ideology

North Korea struggles to save face by resisting crucial foreign aid

By Jehangir Pocha

North Korean troops perform during the Arirang festival at the 150,000-capacity May Day stadium in Pyongyang on October 6, 2005.

The illusion of success on which this secretive nation’s leaders thrive was on full display in early October as the Korean Workers Party celebrated the 60th anniversary of its ascent to power.

Parks and skyscrapers in the country’s showcase city were newly spruced up to valiantly demonstrate how the might and success of the unique brand of Communism practiced by the “hermit kingdom” is still intact.

A song-and-dance extravaganza called “Arirang” was the centerpiece of the festivities. A cast of 100,000 acrobats, dancers, singers, soldiers, musicians and children who made giant designs using colored cards enthralled the audience as they told a love story with predictable ingredients—boy meets girl and, separated by political turmoil, they fight for their country, defeat the United States and go on to build a warm cozy life in the dazzling new Korea created by Kim Il Sung.

As a group of sopranos sang a paean to Korean identity out on the field, Ryong Chol Li, one of the three government escorts accompanying me and three other American journalists on a restricted government-orchestrated tour, seemed genuinely moved. “It shows how our people are united around the Workers Party of Korea with one mind, single-hearted,” he said.

But the decay and despair gripping this isolated country of 23 million could not be entirely stage-managed away. After the show, as our minders hustled us away from curious locals, most lights were out in Pyongyang.

After the glitz of Beijing, our departure city, Pyongyang looks drab and derelict. Rows of concrete buildings lining the streets seem empty, and while smartly uniformed “traffic girls” direct the traffic with crisp, military-like motions, there are almost no cars on the streets. Most people walk, and some push friends or older family members around in makeshift carts. Giant, smoking chimneys add to the sense of industrial decay that drapes the landscape. The only things gleaming here are the AK-47 rifles slung over the shoulders of soldiers in khaki, who are everywhere.

Behind the curtain

The next morning, we drove the bumpy road to the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) that separates North Korea from South Korea and is often called one of the most dangerous places on earth. Peasants in ragged clothes combed recently reaped rice fields for leftover grains. The legacy of the famine and series of natural disasters that killed about 3 million people and rocked this isolated country in the mid-to-late 1990s, when it was already debilitated by the fall of the Soviet Union, is still alive here.

But Pyongyang appears to be making the dangerous mistake of believing its own illusions. The North Korean government recently informed the 25-odd international NGOs it invited into the country in 1995 to help cope with the famine that they will have to close shop by the end of this year.

Gerald Bourke, a public affairs officer with the World Food Program’s (WFP) North Korean operations, says that would be a disaster.

“We very much feel the need to stay,” Bourke says. “We feed about 6.5 million here; if WFP were not there to provide supplementary foods to children and pregnant and nursing women, it could be very serious.”

Dr. Eigil Sorenson, head of the World Health Organization’s office in North Korea, says though his organization will not be “directly affected,” the expulsion of other NGOs could hurt supplies of essential medicines, which “would have a possibly subversive effect on the population.”

A foreign resident in Pyongyang who requested anonymity said one of the main reasons behind the government’s decision is that it does not like “hundreds of foreigners running around the country asking questions and monitoring government activities. It fears this will ‘contaminate’ the country and people.”

Kim Il Sung-ism

Since North Korea’s creation in 1945, its “Great Leader” Kim Il Sung, and his son, Kim Jong Il (known as Dear Leader) have advanced a cult-like ideology of self-reliance called Juche, or “Kim Il Sung-ism.” This philosophy is so fixated on the idea of self-sufficiency that it even has its own calendar, which uses 1912, the year Kim Il Sung was born, as its base year.

The importance authorities attach to maintaining the illusion of Juche power was underlined by the manner in which our embarrassed minders didn’t allow us to talk to the people scavenging in the fields or to photograph the scene. Their explanation: Pictures would only make “the world think all North Koreans are hungry and that there is famine in the country, ” which, of course, they insisted, there isn’t.

“In fact, we’re having a bumper crop this year,” said Mr. Jiang, a minder from the foreign ministry.

As we drove around, Jiang pointed to groups of city school children and office workers who had been drafted by the government to work alongside local farmers in the fields for up to two weeks during the harvesting season.

“This is how we work—as a single society, a single unit with everyone dedicated to the national cause,” said Jiang.

But later, as Jiang and the other minders relaxed, they confessed that North Korea is indeed facing hard times—even if they were quick to translate this into a defense for Pyongyang’s desire to produce nuclear energy.

“We have no power, so nothing can run. That’s why we need the light water reactors,” said Jiang, referring to North Korea’s demand that it receive civilian nuclear technology in exchange for its recent decision to surrender its military nuclear program. “Without power it’s hard to sow crops, water them, cut them, refine them or take them to market.”

Though Moscow, Seoul and Beijing are sympathetic to this argument, Tokyo and Washington, have demurred. Their concern is whether the world’s last Stalinist state will ever cease threatening South Korea and passing on its nuclear (and missile) technology to rogue states such as Pakistan, Libya and Iran in exchange for much-needed hard currency.

Playing catch-up

North Korea desperately needs huge amounts of capital to restructure its Soviet-style, heavy industry-focused economy and sustain the ambitious social programs it put in place during the ’60s and ’70s. Then, North Korea’s economy was bigger than South Korea’s, and even until the early ’80s the country was more developed than China. But today, average Chinese incomes are about four times those in North Korea, and on the Chinese side of the Yalu River that separates the two countries, tourists gather to gaze into North Korea as if it is some kind of zoo.

Yet, instead of embracing reforms as China did, Kim Jong Il is holding fast onto the Juche approach, something he justifies by fanning fears of an imminent invasion by the United States.

This siege mentality, developed after years of having to fend off the Japanese, the United States, South Korea and even big brother China’s unwarranted attentions, has turned North Korea into an economic basket case.

In 2002 Pyongyang half-heartedly experimented with economic reforms by allowing farmers to sell their own produce and setting up special economic zones in places such as Kaesong along the South Korean border, says Corrada Letta, a senior advisor to the president of Kobe University in Japan who just authored a report on North Korea for the European Union. But it all had little effect.

“The greatest problem in Pyongyang is human,” Letta says. “Their political isolation has also led to intellectual isolation and today in no ministry is there enough knowledge on how to go back, on what to do.”

Part of the problem is North Korea’s “army first” policy, which directs the bulk of the nation’s intellectual, economic and social capital to its armed forces.

At the DMZ, North Korean soldiers overlooking the United States’ glass and steel complex on the South Korean side looked sharp in their khaki uniforms and mushroom-peak caps. But the village homes just yards away looked ragged, with many of the children there exhibiting the stunted growth and gauntness of chronic malnutrition and disease.

Still, there is no doubt many North Koreans still fervently believe in their leader and system.

“I come here regularly to study the works of the Great Leader Kim Il Sung,” says Kim Myong Chol, 47, a construction worker spending his morning hunched over Kim’s writings in Pyongyang’s national library, the Grand People’s Study House.

Portraits of the Great Leader and his son hung overhead and computers hummed nearby, even though they could only access North Korea’s intranet and not the Internet.

It had been in a fit of generosity that our minders had allowed us to speak with the researcher during a tour of library. But they soon felt the blowback. Later that afternoon we learned that he had been so enraged with the minders for allowing foreigners to speak with him, that he had lodged a complaint with the authorities—the repercussions of which were serious for our minders.

Opening up, it seems, is a dangerous business in North Korea.

Jehangir Pocha is the Asia correspondent for In These Times.

More information about Jehangir Pocha
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    I saw some video footage some time ago of starving North Korean children, orphaned, stealing crumbs, while the adults shooed them away like flies at an open market.  The videographer (Chinese, or ex-pat, I believe) managed to record conditions in N. Korea undercover and then slip back into China over some mountains.  It was horrible to witness these children suffering terribly in the midst of apathetic able-bodied adults. 

    North Korea holds its pride more precious than its children. 

    It is not surprising to see an isolationist, militarist, covert society plunge into abject poverty.  And we know that poverty-stricken nations will sell anything to anybody for a low low price (and the world pays the highest price for that desperation).

    Posted by pick of the litter on Dec 5, 2005 at 8:48 AM

    “North Korea desperately needs huge amounts of capital to restructure its Soviet-style, heavy industry-focused economy and sustain the ambitious social programs it put in place during the ’60s and ’70s. Then, North Korea’s economy was bigger than South Korea’s, and even until the early ’80s the country was more developed than China.”
    It seems to me that alot of this has to do with the downfall of the USSR and the reaction our country and most the rest of the world has had towards North Korea. Now i do not condone the horrible human rights violations in North Korea. The brain washing, starvation, and overall lack of civil rights. I am merely saying that if North Korea’s economy was once flourishing it could do so again, and if it could do this while giving its people human rights, respect, and dignity while staying with a socialist worker-centric mentality maybe something could be learned huh?
    We can not stand by as greedy corporations ruin our political system and the lives of those in the third world. It is time to work with North Korea(if that is possible) too blend our two systems in order to bring a socialist worker centric brand of government which blends with civil rights, human rights, respect for children and women and outsiders.
    North Korea is no where near the greatest country in the world, in fact it is one of the worst however with these major adjustments maybe Marxism could work, maybe we could see an example of civil liberties, respect and equality in this world for once.
    Go ahead and attack me and call me either a communist, a Republican, or a traitor. However just remember that no political system on this planet has reached perfection yet and all i am saying is that there are pieces of North Koreas system that could be useful in fighting greed.

    Posted by NaderRaider on Dec 6, 2005 at 2:51 AM

    Look into my eyes, what do you see?
    Cult of personality
    I know your anger, I know your dreams
    I’ve been everything you want to be
    I’m the cult of personality
    Like Mussolini and Kennedy
    I’m the cult of personality
    Cult of personality
    Cult of personality

    Neon lights, Nobel prize
    The mirror speaks, the reflection lies
    You don’t have to follow me
    Only you can set me free
    I sell the things you need to be
    I’m the smiling face on your t.v.
    I’m the cult of personality
    I exploit you still you love me
    I tell you one and one makes three
    I’m the cult of personality

    Like Joseph Stalin and Gandhi
    I’m the cult of personality
    Cult of personality
    Cult of personality

    Neon lights, Nobel prize
    When a leader speaks, that leader dies
    You don’t have to follow me
    Only you can set you free

    (blistering lead guitar by Vernon Reid)

    You gave me fortune
    You gave me fame
    You me power in your god’s name
    I’m every person you need to be
    I’m the cult of personality
    I’m the cult of… (repeats)
    ...personality!!!

    “Cult of Personality” performed by Living Colour, 1988
    .............
    A timeless anthem. Leadership and national pride are two-edged swords, beware!

    Posted by Kuya on Dec 6, 2005 at 2:52 AM

    Hello NaderRaider,
    To be honest, I don’t think it’s possible to blend the US system with that of NK. We have a hard enough time upholding ideals like liberty, personal initiative, and “republican values” (nothing much to do with a political party, but a mindset that connects personal efforts with community betterment; a value that was spoken of in 19th century America). Freedom and privacy are fragile enough, without incorporating unfree, anti-private ideals into our cultural mix.

    When the national premise is unconditional obedience to a ruling cadre, who see enemies everywhere and who “governs” the economy for the benefit of no one but that cadre and their henchmen, I’m not sure that a compromise with anything we’d recognize as a life worth living is possible.

    The Kim dynasty doesn’t want you to think. Just obey. And don’t complain, if you know what’s good for you.

    My guess is, neither the most conservative nor the most radical poster here could feel anything but imprisoned in NK. No compromise is possible, we’re too opposite. They’ll have to change from within, and my greatest dismay about the place is that I believe the citizenry there will bear the hideous burden for at least a generation to come before the legacy of the Kim revolution has a prayer of ending.

    Posted by Kuya on Dec 6, 2005 at 3:06 AM

    To think they have so much great Ginseng too.

    Probably the only good thing to come out of the place.

    Kim and GWB should be good mates, Rabbit thinks they are behind the scenes, they have a lot in common.

    Posted by GhostRabbit on Dec 6, 2005 at 6:56 AM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 14 posts.

Appeared in the December 19, 2005 Issue
Also by Jehangir Pocha
  • China Plays Hardball with Soft Power
    Out with strongman Mao and in with svelte-suited diplomats and film personalities: Chinese leaders have learned the value of a warm smile and firm handshakePosted on July 10, 2007
  • Eyes Off the Prize
    As Iraq dominates U.S. attention, China, India and Iran are emerging as the next world powersPosted on February 16, 2007
  • Rebiya Kadeer: The Uighur Dalai Lama
    Falsely imprisoned, this human rights activist is fighting the Chinese government's right to rule her people.Posted on December 7, 2006
  • Chinas Growing Desert
    Overgrazing is stripping arable lands, creating the potential for ecological refugeesPosted on October 13, 2006
  • China Dissidents Disappeared
    Officials round up 'bad elements' as the National People's Congress starts its sessionPosted on March 9, 2006
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS