Donate today and get a free, signed copy of David Sirota's New York Times bestseller The Uprising: An Unauthorized Tour of the Populist Revolt Scaring Wall Street and Washington
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Views > January 24, 2006

Let Them Eat Crap

By Susan J. Douglas

Because its victims are mostly poor, the Type 2 diabetes epidemic has been largely ignored.
Tags   

Begin on the sixth floor, third room from the end, swathed in fluorescence: a 60-year-old woman was having two toes sawed off.” So opened the New York Times’ four-part series in early January, “Bad Blood,” about the Type 2 diabetes epidemic in New York City. Type 2 diabetes is caused by excess weight, lack of exercise and poor diet, and is directly related to poverty.

The series reminded one that poverty has a map. Indeed, even if you did not read every word of “Bad Blood”—each story started on the front page and took up two full pages inside—eye-catching illustrations showed the dividing line between poverty and wealth (96th Street on the Upper East Side) and the fast food gauntlet on the main streets in Flushing, which pulls in recent Asian immigrants who pick up diabetes along with the burger and fries.

Diabetes is the leading cause of blindness and kidney failure in the country; it often leads to amputation. It’s the sixth leading cause of death in the United States and costs us $132 billion a year. And it’s preventable, save for the enormous financial interests involved in its preservation. “Bad Blood” brought together three American scandals—poverty, our morally bankrupt for-profit health care system and the practices of our nation’s fast food joints.

Combined, they make up an illness-industrial complex, in which big players in the food industry, insurance industry and medical establishment profit wildly. But they need more raw materials to keep them going, more fodder for their assembly lines. Poor people of color are that fodder, and very few of the rest of America seems to care.

Remember the summer of 2002 when a lawyer filed suit against McDonald’s and other fast food restaurants? His two teenage clients, one 5-foot-6 and 270 pounds, the other 4-feet-10 and 140 pounds, routinely ate fast food and were diabetic. He charged that McDonald’s did not provide easy-to-understand nutritional information about its fast food, nor disclose that additives made its food less healthy than represented in its ads. The suit immediately became a laughingstock: how preposterous to hold McDonald’s accountable for your own overeating! The National Restaurant Association, however, was far from amused.

The Times’ main point is that Type 2 diabetes is an epidemic that promises to grow widely. But its consequences are seriously underappreciated because the disease’s victims are disproportionately poor people of color. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention project that one in three children—one in three!—born five years ago will become diabetic sometime in their lives. But this will be unequally distributed. The Times showed that below 96th Street on the Upper East Side, with a median income of $75,000 and a poverty rate of 6.2 percent, only 1 percent of the population has diabetes. Up in Spanish Harlem, where the median income is $20,000 and the poverty rate 38.2 percent, 16 percent have diabetes.

There’s just something about this that seems, well, like a business plan. Budget cuts have simultaneously forced schools to eliminate P.E. classes and make up for lost revenue by installing Coke and candy machines in the halls. The food industry spends $10 billion a year marketing foods to kids, and we’re not talking carrots and celery. Clustered in poor neighborhoods, fast food joints continue to hawk 64 oz. sodas and items like Burger King’s Enormous Omelet Sandwich (730 calories, 47 grams of fat). Once poor folk are fattened for the kill, the insurance companies step in. According to the Times, health care providers make a profit when they amputate a limb or provide a prosthetic, but lose money if they seek to prevent blindness or provide nutritional advice.

Because this sickening cycle is only the result of individual (not industrial) greed, in October the House of Representatives passed, by a 306-120 vote, the “Personal Responsibility in Food Consumption Act” (a.k.a., the “cheeseburger bill”), which would protect the food industry from obesity-related lawsuits. Kentucky Republican Mitch McConnell’s companion “Commonsense Consumption Act,” awaits action in the Senate. Already 20 states have enacted their own versions of “commonsense consumption” laws. Guess who wrote them? Lobbyists for the food industry.

According to Melanie Warner, writing in the Times’ business pages, the National Restaurant Association, with headquarters in Washington and 50 state organizations, has led the individual responsibility campaign, dispatching restaurant owners and food executives to the statehouses and Congress. In the last two congressional elections, the food and restaurant industry gave a total of $5.5 million to politicians in the 20 states that have passed laws shielding companies from obesity liability.

The illness-industrial complex is betting that they will get away with this. That’s what the tobacco companies thought too.

Susan J. Douglas is a professor of communications at the University of Michigan and author of The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and How it Has Undermined Women.

More information about Susan J. Douglas
Tags   
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Type 2 diabetes is caused by excess weight, lack of exercise and poor diet, and is directly related to poverty.

    We as a society need to enforce exercise on poor people, especially people of color (as opposed to clear people, i suppose). This can be accomplished by taxing them sufficiently so that they cannot afford to eat fast food, and then using the money collected to enrole them in gyms (after all, it is expensive to exercise).

    Oh, maybe the real solution is to tax TVs - the number of hours spent in front of them is directly related to obesity.

    Or maybe they could stop stuffing their faces with too much food and take a walk? You know, take just a tad of personnal responsibilty for their own lives, sorta like the rest of us. Or is that a racist/classist idea?

    Is this article a parody or is it really meant to be “real”? How silly. . .

    Posted by wolf on Jan 24, 2006 at 4:44 PM

    We must free ourselves!

    Posted by wileywitch on Jan 24, 2006 at 5:02 PM

    This is no joke ... as usual, Democrats & Liberals want to BLAME someone for everything.  It’s always someone elses fault. 

    There is no doubt that those in poverty get Type 2 diabetes more, just like those in poverty spend more on lottery tickets and smoke more. 

    Money is not the problem, the problem is that they are STUPID.  Did you know that those below the poverty line who play the lottery on a regular basis spend $170 per month on the lottery ... that’s $2,000 a year.  And those with college degrees that play the lottery on a regular basis spend $500 a year.  College grad spends $500/yr and someone on welfare spends $2,000/yr on the lottery.

    GO FIGURE ...

    Maybe they should read, or maybe watch TV .. and they might learn something. 

    You have to hand it to the liberals and public schools.  Libs have done a great job educating our kids.  Liberals control our public school system, it’s the biggest liberal union in America and this country is just full of STUPID PEOPLE.

    What the Gov’t should do is this ... everyone on welfare should have to take a few classes on the hazzards of drugs, alcohol, tobacco and obesity. 

    Everyone on welfare should be tested for drugs, alcohol and tobacco and if they test positive they get a warning.  If they test positive a 2nd time, then some of their money gets cuts.  And #3, they go to jail.

    And, they if they are fat, they get weighed every month.  If they don’t lose weight then same rules apply above.

    The jails would be special jails, strict diet, no candy, no chips, no sitting around all day.  They would be forced to exercise and when they lose a certain amount of weight, then they get out of jail.

    Posted by tina1 on Jan 25, 2006 at 12:57 AM

    It looks like someone is a closet liberal yearning for a nanny state.

    Posted by wileywitch on Jan 25, 2006 at 2:27 AM

    Tsk, tsk, tsk tina1. So, the fact that public schools do not sufficently indoctrinate America’s youth with conservative “values” they are liberal centers? Care to provide any proof of that wild accusation?

    Ever stop to consider that walking is not a viable option when one lives in a poor urban neighborhood that suffers from pollution and crime? So the fact that corporate food producers have extensive inroads into the public school system and spend BILLIONS on direct child advertising each year has no impaCt on personal choice? Don’t you think that food producers would have stopped spending all that money on advertising if they did not deem it effective?

    Conservatives deny the existence of social influences on individual decisions, which is why they cannot seem to think that fast-food companies bear any responsibility for their products.

    Posted by Liberal on Jan 25, 2006 at 11:44 AM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 14 posts.

Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues


Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of David Sirota's New York Times bestseller The Uprising: An Unauthorized Tour of the Populist Revolt Scaring Wall Street and Washington

Popular Discussions