Features » March 9, 2006 » Web Only

China Dissidents Disappeared

Officials round up ‘bad elements’ as the National People’s Congress starts its session

By Jehangir Pocha (BEIJING)

Recently arrested, Qi Zhiyong lost lost a leg after he was shot during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protest

Across China, dozens of dissidents engaged in a national hunger strike to protest the Chinese government’s human rights policies have gone missing or been detained. Aparently this is one of the ways that the Chinese government has prepared for the convening of the National People’s Congress (NPC), the country’s parliament, which went into session on March 5.

The trouble began in early February when prominent human rights activist Yang Maodong, alias Guo Feixiong, was beaten up by thugs suspected of being hired by local police. In protest, a small group of activists led by Gao Zhisheng, a Beijing-based lawyer, began a rolling hunger strike. Since each person had to refrain from eating for only one to two days, it allowed numerous ordinary people to participate and protest the government. As news of the hunger strike spread within the growing ranks of China’s politically disenchanted, many of whom Gao has represented in cases against the government, hundreds of people from more than 16 provinces began to join in.

Chinese authorities have been allergic to hunger strikes ever since 1989, when students used them to boost anti-government sentiment during the Tiananmen Square protests. So, when Gao upped the stakes by demanding the government release the hundreds of political prisoners currently being held in labor camps, the crackdown began.

“Our event is completely peaceful and legal,” Gao said in a telephone interview on March 3. “We’re using our own bodies, in our own homes to do what we choose. Yet people who have joined the hunger strike are disappearing. I don’t know exactly how many people, but this is expanding. I’ve been followed by the police for more than three months and now they’ve tapped my phones and cut off most of my communication.” The next day, Gao, who recently had his license suspended for a year after taking on several politically charged cases, was detained by authorities.

Other prominent dissidents who have been arrested so far in conjunction with the hunger strike include Qi Zhiyong, a Tiananmen Square-era protester who lost a leg after he was shot during the 1989 student protests; Liu Xinjuan, a Shanghai activist who, according to her son, has been forcibly admitted to a psychiatric hospital; Zhao Xin, a human rights activist with the Beijing-based Empowerment and Human Rights Institute; his lawyer, Liao Shuangyan; Yu Zhijian, a teacher from central Hunan province who was jailed for 11 years for desecrating a portrait of Mao Zedong during the Tiananmen protests; and Hu Jia, a Beijing-based activist who was blacklisted by authorities after he revealed how a botched blood donation campaign in central Henan province created a massive HIV epidemic there.

Hu’s wife, Zeng Jinyan, refused to talk directly to the press but pointed journalists to a blog she created after her husband’s arrest. There, she describes how Hu was initially placed under house arrest but disappeared on February 16. “He disappeared without any of the medicines and pills he needs everyday (for a liver condition),” Zeng’s blog said. “When we talked to the [local] police station, they didn’t do anything. He’s just disappeared. There’s no news, and nobody, no department or anyone, is saying anything to us. I’m only publishing this private information because I want my husband back.”

On March 2, Liu Jianchao, a spokesperson from the Chinese Foreign Ministry said that the protestors were not conducting their affairs “under a legal framework.” But beyond that the government has said little and imposed a news blackout around the recent hunger strikes and arrests, making it difficult for the local and foreign media to ascertain exactly how widespread the unrest has been. Gao said he’d received letters of support from more than 1,000 people in mainland China and Taiwan, including students, mothers, farmers and factory workers. “We live under a rogue, almost mafia-type government that abuses its people and its own laws,” Gao said just before his detention. “Only the government and the rich have rights here. The people have nothing.”

A government afraid of its citizens

Chinese authorities routinely round up dissidents before politically sensitive periods—such as June 4, the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, or when the NPC is in session. Xu Hu, an official from the Ministry of Public Security Ministry official, confirmed that 15,000 police assisted by 620,000 citizen volunteers would clear Beijing of “bad elements” ahead of the parliament session. “This is aimed at reducing certain factors that might harm public order,” Xu told the local media on March 2.

“The government seems to have gone into fear mode over the last few years,” said Brad Adams, the London-based Asia director of Human Rights Watch, in a telephone interview. “From the outside it just seems absurd. But maybe they know something we don’t know about the fragility of the political system.”

China’s GDP has grown at a frenetic 8 percent a year over the last decade, according to government reports. But social and economic inequalities have grown at an even higher rate, causing resentment among China’s 600 million farmers living in remote interior regions that have been totally bypassed by the economic boom that has transformed coastal cities, such as Shanghai.

“Not only have the [workers and farmers] been left out of the growth, they have been exploited to achieve it,” says Cui Zhiyuan, a professor of political economics at Tsinghua University in Beijing.

Cui notes that Chinese farmers still cannot own their own land and local authorities often seize their holdings and sell it to industries at inflated prices.

According to Huo Yan Ting, vice-director of the Shenzhen Modern Social Observation Institute, when the landless farmers go to cities to find work, they are routinely made to toil for little or no wages because independent trade unions are banned in China and workers cannot bargain with employers.

Last year, according to the Ministry of Public Security, more than 87,000 public protests rocked China, about 25 percent more than the previous year. Until now, most of these rallies were over local or personal grievances, such as unpaid wages and pensions and illegal land seizures. But with an estimated 377 million cell phones and 111 million Internet users in China, the country’s dissatisfied have been learning to organize and unite themselves in increasing numbers.

“The government here has always been paranoid of the risks to stability and having activists link up,” says Adams. “Now as [activists] appear to be able to reach across different boundaries and communities, the authorities are particularly nervous.”

Indications of how high concerns are running over China’s internal divisions came from an unexpected source. The week before he was detained, Gao said that he received an open letter from another famous Chinese dissident, Ding Zilin, whose son was killed at Tiananmen Square. Gao said Ding chastised him for organizing the hunger strike, telling him to stick to law and reject politics.

In his open rebuttal, Gao told Ding that, while he respected her, “after 17 years of tragic experiences, you still have not recognized that under this evil regime, the legal path to fight for rights has become a dead end. Your child, once very much alive, was only one of the countless children killed by this cold-blooded regime. … Your experience in fighting for your rights these past 17 years has proven to be without a moment of legal access under this regime. The regime will never allow you any means to resist.”

That rising sense of futility is the most dangerous thing happening in China now, says Adams.

“The government has cracked down so much that today most of the major activists are already in jail,” Adams says. “That means good people who once stayed inside and system and pushed the rules and who could have been tapped to modernize China, have been forced to step outside the system.”

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Now you see them, now you don’t!

  Hey, folks, in case you have been thinking of China as a billion plus target market for U.S. goods — Wake Up!

  This is a totalitarian run country masquerading as a convert to capitalism. When “subtle” doesn’t work go back to Plan A…

  We say, “Be happy,”  You shut up, smile and bow.

  (Which is, of course is just what the top players do if WE complain about small trade violations such as copyright, patents, quotas, etc.)

  Posted by whattheheck on Mar 9, 2006 at 3:03 PM

  WTH, let’s not be the darking pot calling the kettle black.

  In case you haven’t noticed, Rumsfeld and the whole PNAC crowd is working hard to make China and Russia our enemies again so that they can relive the comic book days of their Cold War youth. I expect to see a lot more news in the future about how awful the Chinese government is to citizens who want “democracy” and “freedom”. Whether the stories are accurate or overblown matters not. The point is that all good Americans are supposed to hate China and think that they are our enemies. (Be prepared for a lot of empty shelves, btw.)

  Though I have no doubt that China is a totalitarian state, I also don’t doubt that our government is no more concerned with Chinese citizens having “democracy”  and “freedom” than the Chinese government is and we won’t be donning our haloes and invading China for regime change.

  Though you won’t find it in the MSM, WTH, all the nuclear powers are now embroiled in a political battle over the weaponization of space. And China is conveniently located near the Caspian Sea, where there is reputed to be the biggest reserves of oil and natural gas in the world, which is rumored to be an exaggerated claim. Nevertheless, if you look at a map or globe you can watch the creep toward the oily basin, and expect to hear a growing media thunder of the evils of nations that surround the Caspian Sea and don’t take orders from us.

  The realpolitik is not being televised.

  All of this may soon be overshadowed by blow-back from Pakistan. We’ll see. Big things, and Too Big Things are just over the horizon. I’m curious to see who our “allies” will be six months from now.

  Posted by wileywitch on Mar 13, 2006 at 8:53 PM

  Can’t help but repeat earlier misgivings I’ve expressed about China as a rising economic power. Others of you have responded with the advice that I don’t hastily assume they’ll be able to sustain the pervasive controls they wield, now that they’ve decided to hook up with market economics. Too much control equals too little wealth growing, and so they’ll lighten up, to paraphrase what I’ve been advised.

  But what keeps coming to mind is my usual severe suspicion about the attractiveness of power and its use. Add to that the increased wealth and regional/global clout that is on the rise in China. Sorry, but I don’t find myself feeling confident that democratic freedoms will gain much ground there, even if they are capitalist running dogs now, or whateverthehell they used to say back in the Cultural Rev.

  Rich powermongers are better able to keep control than broke ones. This is one I’d be glad to be wrong on.

  Posted by Kuya on Mar 14, 2006 at 9:08 AM

  Kuya, China is certainly a rising economic power. There are also public uprisings all over the place (we don’t hear much about workers’ revolts) by workers who want their piece of the pie—-they know the pie is getting bigger, and their government is running all over the place putting out fires (so to speak), especially when there are workers who are not getting paid at all, for some reason.

  They also have a lot of majorly catastrophic floods. But I digress.

  Bicycles are being ordered off roads and roads are being made wider to accomodate the growing middle class in China that has cars now, and wants to buy, buy, buy.  I’m guessing that they will be busy with “growing pains”  and economic expansion for a while before they go into SuperPower mode, if they do so.  And if they aren’t provoked to do so.

  China has shown far more restraint in the nuclear arms race than any of the other declared states—-until now. Our government has decided that China is our enemy, while they produce almost everything on our shelves.  China, having discovered that it is our enemy and major supplier is beefing up its military now. As threatening as that might appear, it just means that they aren’t stupid and/or too poor to defend themselves.

  I can’t imagine even Rumsfeld being stupid enough to attack China, but this administration beats the imagination to death. Boy would we get our asses kicked in a conventional war with China. So we’d use nukes.

  What would we do if China decided to impose its own sanctions on us and stopped supplying us with goods? The Chinese leaders are developing good relations with leaders all over the world and are finding new markets for their wares. They may be able to destroy us economically, but that wouldn’t be because they are big and evil, it would be because we outsourced our manufacturing and let robber barons empty the treasury, and committed a whole host of other ruinous- for -everyone- but- the -very -rich deeds.

  With the exception of Taiwan and Tibet, which are geographical control issues (if I’m not mistaken), China doesn’t appear to be all that concerned with ideological hegemony, though these are issues that the U.S. can use to pick a fight with China. I’m opposed to what China has done to Tibet, of course, but yet more opposed to provoking the giant, which will just lead it to beef up its military and nuclear weapons programs yet more.

  I understand your concern, and I’m not dismissing it. But I think that our own rich powermongers are still very much the threat of the day, especially if they go broke. If the world survives them going broke, then we’ll see what China is made of.

  In our lifetimes, I think the most worrisome thing about China is our government provoking it. China has a real military—- they aren’t led by a bunch of clowns.

  Posted by wileywitch on Mar 14, 2006 at 7:15 PM

  China has a bad habit of political repression, especially noted post-Tianenmen Square (& yet we the people stilll are greedy enough to do business with one of the most anti-globalization sentiments on our suffering planet).
  Also, take a look at their environment. I bet the Russians are loving the acidic rain.  But enough of the digression….

  We still must remember & support those Chinese willing to stand up for change. This in the form of non-governmental organization (NGO’s). The number of these org’s is growing, esp. in the 1990’s. They include the China Green Foundation as well as the China Children & Teenagers Fund. These org’s are allowed to exist so long as they steer clear of politics & do not DIRECTLY challenge gov’t policies.  Simply, the Chinese DO challenge their gov’t by forming & joining org’s that do the work the gov’t should.

  We must remain alert about this sleeping dragon. Economically, the are nearly wide awake, but regarding human rights, they are near -if not at- the bottom. What willl the future bring?  Who knows?  One thing is certain, & that is that China must allow more freedom of speech. alas, that might now happend anytime soon. If the give power, they will lose it. That is their fear.

  Posted by i_am_the_walrus on Mar 14, 2006 at 10:54 PM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 28 posts.

Also by Jehangir Pocha

• China Plays Hardball with Soft Power
  Out with strongman Mao and in with svelte-suited diplomats and film personalities: Chinese leaders have learned the value of a warm smile and firm handshakePosted on July 10, 2007
• Eyes Off the Prize
  As Iraq dominates U.S. attention, China, India and Iran are emerging as the next world powersPosted on February 16, 2007
• Rebiya Kadeer: The Uighur Dalai Lama
  Falsely imprisoned, this human rights activist is fighting the Chinese government's right to rule her people.Posted on December 7, 2006
• Chinas Growing Desert
  Overgrazing is stripping arable lands, creating the potential for ecological refugeesPosted on October 13, 2006
• When Red Goes Green
  A burgeoning Chinese environmental movement tries to stem the devastation wrought by the country's massive economic transformation.Posted on January 18, 2006