News » April 12, 2006
A Legal Limbo
Abdul Hamid Abdul Salam Al-Ghizzawi is frantic.
“He is in very poor health, which deteriorates day after day (details to be discussed with u in person). He has a family that is in desperate need of him.”
The fragment, taken from a page handwritten by another detainee, is the only record of Al-Ghizzawi to emerge from the Guantánamo Bay prison camp in four years. For Candace Gorman, a Chicago attorney who took his case pro bono, it provides the slightest bit of hope that he may someday emerge as well.
A Libyan, Al-Ghizzawi was invisible until he passed word through other detainees that he wanted a lawyer. Dozens of new detainees became known this way last year. Gorman took his case in November.
“The fact that I’ve been representing my client for four months and yet I can’t communicate with him in any way is just ludicrous,” Gorman says.
Gorman cannot see or talk with Al-Ghizzawi without filing a protective order with D.C.’s federal district court–an agreement that warns that she can be prosecuted for sharing classified information. The Justice Department is refusing to let those agreements be filed, because cases currently before the D.C. appeals court and the Supreme Court–Al Odah v. United States and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld–will affect what rights and legal venues detainees can access. The Supreme Court decided two years ago that detainees can challenge their detention, but until the latest cases are cleared everything else–including Gorman’s emergency petition to see Al-Ghizzawi–has been sidelined.
Perversely, Al-Ghizzawi may be lucky. Recent disclosures of detainee records show not all even have habeas petitions filed on their behalf yet, says Barbara Olshansky, assistant legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, which is coordinating their legal fight. These motions allow prisoners to challenge the legality of their detention.
For these prisoners, legal aid may come too late. The Detainee Treatment Act, passed late in 2005 as a rider to a military appropriations bill, strips detainees of their right to challenge their detention in court. The administration is arguing that it retroactively removes habeas rights for all detainees.
Even for those few lawyers who had already filed protective orders, gaining access to their clients is difficult. Some detainees have told lawyers they meet in the same rooms in which they are tortured. Meetings are videotaped, and lawyers’ notes are stripped from them before they exit the prison door. The notes are stamped “Classified,” and released weeks or months later with redactions.
Scraps of information reach Gorman this way, including the fact that Al-Ghizzawi has a brother who is a professor.
Bush administration officials called Guantánamo detainees “the worst of the worst.” But a Seton Hall law school team examined the redacted government filings against 517 detainees and found that slightly more than half have not been accused by the U.S. government of a single hostile act. The report also found that just 7 percent were apprehended by U.S. forces.
Instead, almost all detainees were turned over to U.S. custody by third parties, mostly Pakistani authorities and bounty-hunters enticed by pamphlets spread through the Middle East promising “enough money to take care of your family, your village, your tribe for the rest of your life.”
“They just paid the cash and got the person,” says John Anderson, an ex-Marine reservist and lawyer at Sutherland Asbill & Brennan whose firm represents five Yemeni detainees. “In many cases I think they were wondering what they had on their hands, and had no way of finding out.”
“What you will see [in Guantánamo] are men who are farmers, woodworkers,” Olshansky says. “They are the poorest people in the world. There’s not going to be a huge dossier on them.”
The appeals court is scheduled to hear its detainee case in March, and the Supreme Court decision is due in June. So Gorman–and Al-Ghizzawi–wait. She considers traveling to Libya to find his brother. Reluctantly she says, “That’s for another day.”
ABOUT THIS AUTHOR
Mischa Gaus is an editor of Labor Notes magazine, the largest independent union publication in the United States.

SAVE 53% OFF
Reader Comments
The point is, in so many cases we have no idea whether Guantanamo detainees are “the worst of the worst” or mere “woodworkers and farmers.” Why? Because they’re beyond due process. They’re beyond either military or civilian justice because the administration apparently cannot live with being bound by Constitutional limits upon power, making the case that America is essentially undefended unless the president has unlimited freedom of action. This apparently includes the freedom to hold suspects without a trial or even a charge.
Gather evidence. Charge. Try. Convict and punish, or acquit and release. Is there some other course of action that makes any sense?
Of course we could just kill them all, but that might look inhumane.
Speaking of “making a case”, the conundrum that is Guantanamo was pointed up by today’s rejection in the Supreme Court of an appeal filed by two Uighur Muslims who have been in Guantanamo for roughly 4 years, as well as having been deemed “unthreatening” by a military tribunal almost a year ago. No threat, yet not to be released, because the detainees face possible torture or death if they are transferred back to Xinjiang province in China.
I guess they can work on their tans in the balmy Cuban sunshine while they languish. They can’t be allowed to enter the US, so it is said, because that would provide a disadvantageous precedent for other detainees’ lawyers to exploit. Conundrum indeed.
It just gets more intricate and convoluted with each passing day, the White House less and less able to manage the unplanned-for consequences of their decisions, the country less and less able to hold up its collective head with the confidence that it is on the right path.
Posted by Kuya on Apr 18, 2006 at 1:20 AM
Mohammed Jawad is still struggling to pick up the pieces of his lost childhood and teenage years after languishing for seven whole years in America
Posted by feka on Oct 24, 2009 at 3:25 AM
This collection features bold colors and classic styling for the traditional bride with a prom dresses . Colored borders in different styles frame the center panel on each dress up games , but each of the borders has its own unmistakable character. Coupled with boldly patterned envelopes, the cheap prom dresses and hair extensions are both elegant and strikingly unique, a great deal like Vera Wang’s bridal dress designs. The two main designs in the Vera Wang Borders collection are the Bar Panel Border and the Hand Tinted Border lace front wigs andprom dresses 2011 . The wedding invitations and junior bridesmaid dresses are coupled with very stylish envelopes with linings inspired by Wang’s own designs. The Hand Tinted borders are more subtle but no less striking, with borders hand tinted in bold, bright colors. There are no frilly details, just a wedding invitation wording , classy and bold style statement.
Posted by wedding on Jul 15, 2010 at 8:06 PM
There’s another reason 70-551 for keeping husbands off-stage: His scandals—particularly economic ones—will become hers. Whether it’s Geraldine Ferrarro 70-552 fighting off accusations that her husband had mob connections or Republican Jeanine Pirro having to distance herself from her spouse’s income-tax evasion, women can’t convincingly argue 70-553 that they have an independent financial life. “For women, their husband’s finances are assumed to be theirs,” Carroll says. “Any issues 70-554 about the finances of the husband, it becomes an issue for the wife. It doesn’t always happen 70-555 the other way.”
Posted by Clark Anderson on Dec 19, 2010 at 11:01 PM
Posting Security