Read Senior Editor Laura Washington's 8 reasons to make a tax-deductible donation to In These Times.
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Views > April 25, 2006

Solidarity from Barrio to Barbershop

By Laura S. Washington

If you survey the crowds at the pro-immigrant marches, you don't see many African-American faces. The grassroots needs to be there.
Tags   

“There’s no doubt that Mexican men and women—full of dignity, willpower and a capacity for work—are doing the work that not even blacks want to do in the United States.”

Mexican President Vicente Fox’s comments last year to a group of Mexican businessmen ignited a political firestorm across the Americas. Fox also foreshadowed a powerful divide in the national debate over immigration reform.

He was defending Mexican immigrants, arguing they are hard-working, essential assets to the American economy. Some African Americans retorted that Fox’s declaration was racist and demeaning, and that “they” are breaking our laws and taking our jobs.

There is esperanza. In February, a provocative museum exhibit opened in Chicago that is confronting Mexico’s racist past head-on.

“The African Presence in Mexico” opened in February at the Mexican Fine Arts Center Museum, the largest Latino arts organization in the United States. The museum is a cultural centerpiece of the largely Mexican Pilsen neighborhood on Chicago’s Southwest Side. The show traces the Mexican “Third Root”—what the museum calls the “missing chapter” of Mexican history—500 years of African contributions to Mexican society and culture.

Africans were first brought in bondage to Mexico in 1519. On Jan. 6, 1609, Yanga, an African leader, founded the first free African township in the Americas. Since then, black Mexicans have made an indelible mark on the nation’s art, music, cuisine and culture.

The exhibit runs in Chicago through Sept. 3, and will later travel across the United States and Mexico. It is bolstered by an assiduous effort by Latino and African-American leaders to educate their constituents about common goals and identities.

Yet staging the exhibit epitomizes the ambivalence about forging alliances among both African Americans and Latinos. Museum President Carlos Tortolero had braced himself. He knew it would push buttons, he says, and the museum has received “obscene phone calls” from people objecting to the embrace of Mexican blackness. Still, the show is drawing record crowds. Many are African-American.

For me, the exhibit recalled memories of growing up in Chicago in the ’60s, when Chicago was as segregated as the Deep South. We lived on the city’s black South Side. Most black folks never ventured outside of the ‘hood, much less to Latino enclaves on the other side of town. But my mother worked on 18th Street, a bustling Pilsen barrio. She did clerical work alongside Mexican immigrant ladies at the Bethlehem Center, a now-defunct settlement house. She brought home kind words about her hermanas along with some killer taco recipes. The night of an infamous “Big Snow,” a record blizzard, a co-worker gave her a ride home in the middle of the night. I was proud of my mother’s solidarity with her Mexican sisters. I thought she was, too.

Now I have to drop a dime on Mama. The other day I called to say hello. She had been watching footage of the massive marches advocating for immigration reform. Mama delivered a 20-minute rant aimed at Latino immigrants. 

Her voice dripped with disgust. “Those people are breaking the law. They have no right to be here. They are taking our jobs. They don’t even want to learn to speak English. We’re paying for their health care … their schools. And they have the nerve to demand, demand that we give them citizenship!”

It was ugly. I tried to reason with her, but I couldn’t get a word in edgewise.

And Mom is not alone. In the heat of the ongoing debate over immigration reform, her sentiments are echoed in venues from black talk radio to the barbershops. 

For once, the leaders may be ahead of the flock. Last spring Antonio R. Villaraigosa was elected the first Mexican-American mayor of Los Angeles since 1872 on the strength of a progressive black/brown coalition. He follows in the footsteps of Harold Washington, who was elected in 1983 as Chicago’s first black mayor by an alliance of blacks, Latinos and liberal whites. 

U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a Puerto Rican seven-termer from Chicago’s Northwest Side, has announced he will soon give up his seat to launch what he calls a cross between a Latino Rainbow PUSH and a political action committee. He recently teamed up with U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. in a black/brown bid to elect Joy Cunningham, an African-American woman, to the Illinois Appellate Court. 

Still, if you survey the crowds at those pro-immigrant marches, you don’t see many African-American faces. The grassroots is not there yet.

The pols must convince the people that it is in their urgent interest to resist the divisive race-baiting propagated by the powers that be. “African Presence” confirms there are spots to hoe common ground. I’m working on getting Mama to the show.

Laura S. Washington, an In These Times senior editor, teaches journalism at DePaul University and is a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times.

More information about Laura S. Washington
Tags   
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Sounds like Mama was not able to reason with *Laura*. . .

    Posted by wolf on Apr 25, 2006 at 9:55 AM

    Laura:

    I’m sure your Mom realized through her friendship with Hispanic women that Hispanics in general and Mexicans in particular are not exactly pro-Black.  That some in their community are “ objecting to the embrace of Mexican blackness.” says it all.  If you think “pols must convince the people that it is in their urgent interest to resist the divisive race-baiting propagated by the powers that be.”, then they need to find current real-time common ground rather than a distant historical encounter.

    Posted by theloneous on Apr 25, 2006 at 12:40 PM

    ILLEGAL immigration is not a racist issue.  Many of the protesters carried signs calling for a “FAIR” immigration policy.

    Can someone tell me if there is something in the current policy which discriminates against Mexicans who apply for citizenship?  Does the legal procedure favor other races and nationalities?

    Would it not be “fair” to expect all applicants to follow the same process?

    If President Fox took better care of his “essential assets” instead of pushing them off on us there would be no illegal/legal problem.

    Posted by whattheheck on Apr 26, 2006 at 11:54 AM

    This issue has many facets which are seldom discussed.

    There is much poverty and corruption in Mexico which must be addressed; many of the current problems can be traced to the rampant corruption which has decimated the middle class while increasing the wealth of the top 5%. Perhaps President Fox could first address these issues in his own country.  Or perhaps he is worried that the millions - or is it billions—of dollars sent home to Mexico each year would be lost. 

    Have you considered how Mexico treats illegal aliens from other countries in Latin America? Brutally.  Yet Mr. Fox expects a different treatment for Mexicans coming illegally to the US.  We should all resent this one-sided expectation.

    Have you considered the long-term affects of absorbing what is probably not 11 million, but over 20 million individuals? If the US economy was robust, they would most likely be absorbed. But in today’s economy, it is not unlikely that it will have a dampening affect on wages and benefits, particularly wages and benefits at the lower end of the earnings scale.  Will we end up with higher levels of poverty and crime, greater stress on our already financially-challenged school and healthcare systems?

    Have you considered who most benefits from dampening wages, from not paying benefits?  Have you considered why - until last month - there had been only 4 companies investigated for hiring illegal aliens in the last year?  In Clinton’s last year in office over 500 were investigated.

    Have you considered the logistic nightmare - and costs - of “legalizing” 11-20 million illegal aliens?  Given the current immigration backlog (years), how soon will the financially strapped INS be able to seriously investigate and process each of these illegal aliens? How long do they stay while they are waiting?  Who will finance this? Me?  You?  President Fox?

    Have you considered the precedence being set? My husband’s daughter has been waiting for over a decade to come to this country from Peru.  She has abided by US laws. Should she and other law abiding individuals be penalized because illegal aliens working in this country decide they should move to the front of the line? Or should she come here illegally to gain citizenship? 

    There are many questions to be answered before we agree to anything that will have such a profound effect.  It requires more than marching in the street, It requires time to seriously research, dialog and carefully plan. It requires time to develop a concensus among the citizens of the US… because it is a decison that affects our country.  It should not be the decision of special interests or foreign governments or illegal aliens.

    Posted by mochica on May 1, 2006 at 10:51 PM

    Anybody intimidated by the number of Hispanic protesters on May 1st should consider the influence they would have if all are made legitimate citizens. “Our representatives” don’t have the guts to deal with this issue now, what will it be like if another 10 to 20 million are added to the mix. In addition they are the fastest growing per family.

    Too bad they don’t organize and march on Vincente’s turf — just maybe they could make some changes down there which would help future generations. In case no one remembers, that is how we got what we have here… previous generations did it for us.

    Anyone who is here illegally should go back out and come in the front door. There you will find a WELCOME mat.

    I did not notice anything unusual except for the 24/7 news blather. I went about my business of “doing those things I don’t like to do” for myself. Then I did the things I like.

    Many thanks — to our ancestors.

    Posted by whattheheck on May 2, 2006 at 7:32 AM
  • register a new account »Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.
Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues


Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of Rick Perlstein's new book Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America!

Popular Discussions