Support ITT by donating used Apple computers. Please e-mail donatecomputers@inthesetimes.com!
PrintDiscuss
Features » May 10, 2006

No Room in Prison? Ship Em Off

Prisoners have become unwitting pawns in a lowest-bidder-gets-the-convict shuffle game

By Silja J.A. Talvi

From left: Hawaiian inmates Margarette Kealoah-Naki, Geraldine Kealoha, Patsy Kahunaele and Deenie Tanele in a holding area outside the inmate visitation room at the Otter Creek Correction Center in Wheelwright, Ky.

Tags   
Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller

It has been an arduous, surreal journey for eight Hawaiian female prisoners sent to do their time on the mainland.

The plight of this group of women housed, most recently, in a prison in the small eastern Kentucky town of Wheelwright, would have escaped unnoticed, had it not been for the death of 43-year-old Sarah Ah Mau, on New Year’s Eve 2005. Mau, serving a life sentence for second-degree murder, had been incarcerated since 1993 and had a shot at parole eligibility in August 2008.

She never got that chance. Instead she died of as-yet-unexplained “natural causes” after two days in critical condition—and a month after first complaining of severe gastrointestinal distress. Family members and fellow prisoners say that Ah Mau’s pleas for medical care were ridiculed, downplayed or ignored by prison employees. As her stomach distended—and other body parts began to swell visibly—prisoners say that Ah Mau was fed castor oil and told to stop complaining unless she wanted to face disciplinary action.

What was Hawaiian resident Ah Mau doing in Kentucky in the first place? She was a commodity in an increasingly common practice: interstate prison transfers. Prison transfers, while not unusual, have a profound effect on inmates and family members alike. Children and spouses of “shipped” prisoners have little, if any, opportunity to see their loved ones. And due to special contracts with phone companies, telephone calls are prohibitively expensive. Prisoners themselves are sent to culturally unfamiliar facilities where they are supposed to be treated according to the laws and regulations granted by their home states—but rarely are. Home state law and prison regulation books are rarely available, making the prisoners’ appeals or grievance requests even more difficult to file.

Most of the prisoners transferred out of their home states (which include but are not limited to Alabama, Colorado, North Dakota, Vermont, Washington and Wyoming) end up in privately run facilities in rural communities. Many of the guards hired for such prisons are under-trained, ill-prepared for their stressful work environments, and are paid “fast-food restaurant wages,” according to Ken Kopczynski, executive director of Private Corrections Institute (PCI), a prison watchdog group.

“This is a major issue,” says Kopczynski. “The private prison companies have found a real niche for themselves.”

————————————-

Hawaii represents the most extreme example of these practices because all of its transferred prisoners are sent to the mainland, and because all of those prisoners are sent to facilities run by just one private prison operator: Corrections Corporation of America (CCA).

Today, Hawaii leads the nation in interstate prisoner transfers. Nearly 2,000 prisoners—roughly half of the state’s adults convicted of felonies—are serving out their sentences in CCA-run prisons in Arizona, Kentucky, Mississippi and Oklahoma. Notably, 41 percent of the “shipped” prisoners have been native Hawaiian, although they represent only 20 percent of the state’s prison demographic.

Such prisoners have few recourses. A 1983 U.S. Supreme Court ruling based on a Hawaiian prisoner’s lawsuit protesting out-of-state relocation, Olim v. Wakinekona, held that prisoners have no right to be confined in a particular prison, region or state. More recently, a 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling reinforced and enhanced the Supreme Court decision by deciding that parents in prison had no right to insist on staying in their home state for the sake of their children. All subsequent legal challenges to out-of-state prison transfers have failed.

“These transfers are very problematic for a number of reasons,” notes David Fathi of the ACLU’s National Prison Project in Washington, D.C. “Visitation is all but impossible, and visitations are very important to prisoner mental health. [Visits] are usually correlated with positive prison adjustment behavior as well as decreased recidivism rates.”

A 1993 study focused on the recidivism rates of Hawaiian prisoners found that 90 percent of inmates sent to other states to do their time eventually returned to prison. Those incarcerated in their home state had recidivism rates ranging from 47 to 57 percent.

Studies like these notwithstanding, the situation in Kentucky isn’t likely to change in the near future. In fact, most of the Hawaiian women incarcerated in Kentucky have already experienced four transfers within the continental United States.

————————————-

Sarah Ah Mau was one of the 62 Hawaiian women who first arrived in Southern Texas in May 1997, at the Crystal City Correctional Center, 40 miles from the Mexico border. The facility was in dire shape, and the heat extremes were completely unfamiliar to the prisoners, according to local news reports. But the prisoners, including Mau, seemed to do what they could to fit in. There, Mau gained the trust of the guards and facility officials, and was even allowed outside of facility walls on work detail.

In August 1998, 64 Hawaiian women were moved to the Central Oklahoma Correctional Facility (COCF) in McLoud, newly built by the Correctional Services Corporation. The women seemed to accept the situation because, at least, the living conditions were acceptable. That is, until February 2003, when the Oklahoma Department of Corrections announced its intent to purchase that facility. By late summer of that year, the Hawaiian women reported to the Hawaii Department of Public Safety (DPS) that the overall operations and security of COCF had gone downhill. According to reports received by Kat Brady, coordinator of the Community Alliance on Prisons in Honolulu, the situation involved disgruntled unionized staff, lack of programs, sick leave abuse and “staff having sexual relationships with inmates.”

The Hawaii DPS decided to move the women to another facility. On Aug. 1, 2004, the 64 Hawaiian women were transferred to the Brush Correctional Facility (BCF) in Colorado. There, according to Brady, things went from bad to worse. At BCF, the women were discouraged by leaky rooftops, broken plumbing, lack of drug treatment programs and inadequate medical care.

BCF prison employees were hired quickly and, as it turned out, without the requisite background checks. Allegations of sexual harassment and abuse were soon to follow. Initially dismissed by GRW internal investigators, many of the charges turned out to be true. Not only had five convicted felons been hired as staff members, but four prison employees were ultimately charged and convicted of criminal offenses ranging from running a cigarette smuggling ring to sexually abusing female prisoners. BCF’s prison warden resigned and was later indicted as an accomplice in one of the sexual misconduct cases.

It was time to send the women somewhere else. That is, anywhere but back home, where the state’s sole female prison was packing three women into cells designed to accommodate one to two prisoners.

Next page »Page 1 of 2
  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Silja J.A. Talvi, a senior editor at In These Times, is an investigative journalist and essayist with credits in many dozens of newspapers and magazines nationwide, including The Nation, Salon, Santa Fe Reporter, Utne, and the Christian Science Monitor.

More information about Silja J.A. Talvi
Tags   
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    In a related development, Canada’s only private prison is reverting back to public control. Interestingly, the issue wasn’t money—the private Utah-based company running the prison did save the province money—but rather “security, prisoner health care and other concerns were below the quality of services seen at a nearly identical publicly operated facility.”

    Read on:

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/Page/document/v4/sub/MarketingPage?use er_URL=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060427.wjail0427/BNS Story/National/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20060427.wjail0427&ord=114 47294183402&brand=theglobeandmail&force_login=true

    Posted by JDThompson on May 10, 2006 at 8:58 PM

    I would be curious to know statistics linking distant transfer of prisoners to those same prisoners’ rates of recidivism and reincarceration. A cousin of mine who has been inside for 8 years has made it repeatedly clear that the only thing keeping him going has been the regular visits of his family members, who live about 2 hours from the prison he is in. I don’t want to imagine how things might change for him psychologically if he should be transferred to a distant location, especially since he will one day be released and will have to mix once again with regular civilians. We already know that prison often hardens inmates, making them worse as people than they were when they were first jailed. Maybe this is one major factor.

    For the record, his was a non-violent offense. Drug charges.

    Yeah, I know he should have known better.

    Posted by Kuya on May 11, 2006 at 6:56 AM

    JTD—Could not find link even when registered…

    Private prisons are like Diebold voting machines—- strong indicators of a society going ever increasingly faster down the pan.

    Posted by frog on May 11, 2006 at 9:39 PM

    Sorry about that—G&M appears to have moved the article to their “premium” pages. Here’s another link to the same text:

    http://www.prisonjustice.ca/starkravenarticles/cncc_unprivatized_0406.html

    Posted by JDThompson on May 11, 2006 at 10:36 PM

    JDT
    prisonjustice.ca

    A much better link, two articles instead of one.Thanks .

    The original US article , above, describes such a situation of awfulness and inhumanity, that one wonders how anyone could support such a system.

    Good to see that Canada has not completely lost its head, but the war has not been won, just one battle.

    The Privatisers will be back———-

    ....“It’s just that from our perspective, for the type of facilities we want to run, we have found that there is not any great benefit when you factor in not just the nominal costs.”

    .....
    ———————————& ——————————— 8212;——————————̵ 12;————-

    Firm, Ontario dispute jail savings
    Apr. 28, 2006
    CANADIAN PRESS

    Prisoners and taxpayers are better served when jails are run publicly, Ontario’s corrections minister said Friday despite a company’s claims that millions of taxpayer dollars will be lost when Canada’s only privately run prison is returned to the province.


    But Correctional Services Minister Monte Kwinter insists prisoner health care, security and rehabilitation were all lacking at the Central North Correctional Centre in Penetanguishene compared to a virtually identical jail run by public workers.
    .....

    Kwinter said the study showed offenders were better treated by the public service and were less likely to reoffend.

    ...

    Kwinter wouldn’t elaborate on past problems at Penetanguishene. However, two years ago, a review of staffing levels there indicated chronic understaffing and a lack of adequate supervision.

    Kwinter acknowledged it was cheaper to run the prison privately. But he attributed the savings to the contract drawn up by the previous Conservative government in Ontario that allowed the company to employ 94 fewer people than Kawartha Lakes, which the minister said resulted in lower-quality services.

    “The contract was flawed and we had two-tier correctional delivery,” Kwinter said.

    The company, which runs jails in the United States and Australia, denies the smaller workforce impacted services. !!!


    Kwinter said the company was fully compliant according to its contract. But he said there were plenty of situations where understaffing led to substandard services.

    For example, Kwinter said there are nine people at Kawartha Lakes who work to follow up with inmates after they leave prison so they can reintegrate into society. Penetanguishene only had one staff member doing such work, Kwinter said.

    New Democrat critic Peter Kormos said it’s a good thing the prison is being returned to public hands. But he also said it provides evidence that the government shouldn’t be looking to private companies to run anything from hospitals to highway maintenance.

    “When you are dealing with public safety . . . the existence of a middle man who is going to suck money out of the process by way of profits inevitably puts the public at risk,” Kormos said.

    Conservative Leader John Tory, however, said the government shouldn’t shut the cell door on privatizations of prison operations.

    “I don’t think we should rule it out,” Tory said.

    Source: www.thestar.com


    ———————————& ——————————— 8212;——————————̵ 12;——————
    More articles on prisonjustice.ca on privatization
    More information on the fight against the privately-run CNCC: Citizens Against Private Prisons

    Posted by frog on May 12, 2006 at 6:30 AM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 11 posts.

Appeared in the May 2006 Issue
Also by Silja J.A. Talvi
  • De-escalating the Drug War
    Obama's pick to head ONDCP is better than your average drug czar.Posted on March 13, 2009
  • Ending the War on Drugs
    Will the Obama administration put justice back in the criminal justice system?Posted on March 2, 2009
  • Our Town vs. Exxon
    Marine biologist Riki Ott explains how Cordova, Alaska, rebounded 20 years after the oil spill. Posted on February 20, 2009
  • All Work, No Play
    Vacation time shouldn't be the privilege of a few, but the right of all Posted on October 22, 2008
  • Reporting From The Ground Up
    The power of street reportingPosted on June 28, 2008
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS