News » June 21, 2006

Curriculum Wars

A California State Senator wants to help public schools catch up with history

By John Ireland

California State Senator Sheila Kuehl (left) is battling Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger over whether public school textbooks should study the role of gays in society.

California State Sen. Sheila Kuehl knows the pitfalls of being young and gay firsthand. At 17, she was a television star, playing the role of Zelda Gilroy, in the weekly television sitcom, The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis. She was good enough that CBS filmed four episodes of a spin-off titled Zelda, only to be shelved when network executives began to suspect that their lead actress might be lesbian. She was also expelled from her sorority at UCLA after some of her sisters discovered a letter from her girlfriend.

Sheila took her indignation to Harvard Law School, then into a successful law career and finally to the state house. She was the first openly gay member of the California legislature and has championed issues affecting its citizens as an assemblywoman and now a senator. In February, she introduced a Senate bill (SB 1437), hoping to help to mitigate the alienation that gay teens face in public schools.

California law currently requires K-12 social science instruction to include a study of the role and contributions of both men and women, Black Americans, American Indians, Mexicans, Asians, Pacific Islanders, and other ethnic groups, with a particular emphasis on portraying the role of these groups in contemporary society. It prohibits textbook content, instruction or school-sponsored activities that reflect adversely on race or ethnicity, disability, nationality and religion. Simply put, SB 1437 adds sexual orientation and gender to that list, specifying that the information be presented in an age-appropriate manner. The bill passed the Senate and is headed to a vote in the Assembly sometime this summer.

The bill is drawing California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger into a debate that will pit his socially progressive views against the socially conservative dogma of his political base. Nationally, it poses the question of whether public school curriculum can catch up with popular culture.

According to David Holladay, executive director of the Los Angeles chapter of the nonprofit Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), “the only way that gay and lesbian kids can see themselves in schoolbooks now is in the context of the AIDS epidemic or wearing pink triangles during the Holocaust.” A 2003 GLSEN survey found that 76.2 percent of youth reported that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender issues were rarely addressed or discussed in school. The survey further found that silence and biased messages promote negative stereotypes, which can lead to discrimination, harassment and violence. But when these issues are discussed, gay students report that they feel safer.

In 2002, GLSEN conducted a study of 13 texts used in schools around the country. Four texts directly discuss gay and lesbian themes. Two of those four provided photographic representations of gay and lesbian themes. And only two reference “Gays and Lesbians” and “Gays and Lesbian Rights” in their index or table of contents.

The study’s author, GLSEN’s Director of Education Scott Hirschfeld, asks, “What are students to infer, for example, from a book that defines HIV/AIDS as something that happened to Rock Hudson during the Reagan years?” (p. 886, American Odyssey: The United States in the 20th Century, 1999). Of 12,530 total pages of text, an aggregate of less than one page directly addresses LGBT issues, a shockingly low .007 percent of the total textbook material.

Elizabeth Sevilla, a high school English teacher in Compton, says, “If this bill passes, my job gets easier. Kids giggle when the word ‘gay’ is spoken in class, because it is taboo. This distracts from my teaching, because I have to stop and challenge the ignorance. Many of them use it in a negative way, meaning ‘stupid’—’You’re so gay’—and this makes anyone who might be gay or have a gay family member or friend uncomfortable. But when the kids learn, for instance, that Langston Hughes, one of the great poets of the Harlem Renaissance was gay, they stop using the word as a weapon against one another.”

Indeed, it’s not just Langston Hughes. If SB 1437 becomes law, students could learn more about the role Bayard Rustin, a top lieutenant of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., played as principal organizer of the 1963 March on Washington. Many believe that he stayed behind the scenes to avoid political backlash from the revelation that he was gay. High school teachers could explain the 1969 Stonewall Riots in Greenwich Village, or the 1978 murder of San Francisco Supervisor Harvey Milk.

On May 25, two weeks after the Senate passed SB 1437 but before the Assembly considered it, Schwarzenegger’s office broke its rule of reserving comment on bills until they arrive for his signature. Director of Communications Adam Mendelsohn announced that the governor would veto the bill. The timing is noteworthy, with the announcement coming just days before the beginning of Gay Pride month. While the veto announcement may lessen the expectations for the legislation, it could also galvanize its supporters, leading increased pressure on Schwarzenegger.

Mona Passignano, states issues analyst of Focus on the Family, is heartened by the stance announced by the governor’s office, but not entirely satisfied. “I really want to hear it straight from him,” she says.

Meanwhile, the bill’s sponsor, Kuehl, is not accustomed to taking “no” for an answer. “He hasn’t made up his mind, I don’t care what some underling might have said,” she says. “When it gets to the floor, I expect to talk to the governor and I expect to get it through. … There’s nothing controversial about it … once people understand what it really does.”

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Dear Ms. Kuehl,

  My deepest gratitude for all of your efforts pertaining to healthcare and curricula in California.

  Posted by 14Justice on Jun 21, 2006 at 4:53 PM

  What are the options here? Should everyone have to embrace gayness, or can we have it both ways? Perhaps text books that offer the various opinions on whether being gay is good or bad. Many mainstream Christians believe that gay sexual behaviour is bad, should we merely censor that point of view? If so, what other voices are we allowed to muzzle (for our own good, of course)?

  Posted by wolf on Jun 21, 2006 at 5:26 PM

  No one’s advocating mandatory fellatio, Woof.

  On the other hand, giving Bush a blowjob might conceivably persuade a Republican dominated Congress to impeach him.

  Posted by Major Major on Jun 22, 2006 at 3:35 PM

  I sympathize with any kids who feel endangered in their schools.  However, I do not think that mandating gay inclusion in every subject and every grade (as I understand the bill) is a government matter, or even an educational matter. 

  We have seen what such mandates mean in Mass., where a book about 2 princes who marry was trotted out immediately to be read to kindergartners.  Parents who protested were told they had no right to do so. 

  Do parents retain the right to mold their children’s character, or do schools now have a mandate to indoctrinate according to the liberal view?

  Posted by jchh on Jun 23, 2006 at 12:29 PM

  The people who currently oppose the inclusion of gays among the American mainstream population are the sons and daughters of the people who opposed the inclusion of minorities among the American mainstream, who were themselves the sons and daughters of the people who opposed the inclusion of immigrants and women among the American mainstream, and all of them - children, parents, grandparents and great-grandparents - were opposed to the social dislocations created by the Industrial Revolution, which required an educated (indoctrinated), industrial workforce.  The public education system was created to educate a rural agricultural workforce and transform it into an urban industrial workforce.  When the industrial system required wage laborers, a civil war was waged and slavery was abolished, immigrants were imported from Europe and educated for factory employment, women were emancipated from their household farms and employed in the health and education industries, minority labor was required to counter the unionization of white labor and gays were increasingly accepted among a labor force which recognized the economic industrial necessity of population control, which was preferable to the more traditional forms, such as wars, famines, epidemics and revolution.

  Posted by Major Major on Jun 23, 2006 at 4:10 PM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 12 posts.

Also featured Sticks & Stones and Dykes
Legislating Under the Influence
Was the Presidential Election Stolen?

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by John Ireland

• Prop Hate and My Family
  Last Labor Day, my partner and I were legally married in California. Two… morePosted on January 6, 2009
• Marriage Equality in Peril
  'Prayer warriors' battle to pass state referendums banning gays and lesbians from marryingPosted on October 1, 2008
• He Shoots, She Scores
  When Mike became Christine, she gave Los Angeles sports fans a courtside view of gender politicsPosted on June 27, 2007
• Transsexuals in popular culture
  Recent Hollywood portrayals and fictional dramatizations have boosted the national visibility and humanity of transsexualsPosted on June 27, 2007
• Defining Hate in the United States
  Despite widespread public support, hate crime law across the country remains inconsistent and the crimes often go unpunished. Posted on May 9, 2007