News » July 12, 2006

Are Primaries Going West?

DNC floats a proposal to reform the primary system.

By Christopher Moraff

Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and the Michigan Democratic Party have called for reforms to the primary system.

In an early bid to affect the 2008 race, the DNC is floating a primary reform proposal that it hopes will address the system’s shortcomings. But is it enough?

On March 11, the DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee voted in favor of a proposal set forth earlier by its Commission on Presidential Nomination, Timing and Scheduling that would expand the presidential nomination process with the intention of creating a more level playing field. Refomers hope to pull in greater numbers of minorities and labor constituents and mitigate the phenomenon of “front-loading”—a high concentration of early scheduled contests—by offering bonus delegates to those states that wait to hold their primaries.

Increased front-loading means that nominations are secured before most Americans have had the chance to vote at all. The University of Virginia’s Center for Politics found that in the run-up to the 2000 election, George W. Bush and Al Gore had “all but locked up” their respective nominations by March 7—before voters in 33 states cast their ballots.

The DNC’s solution is anything but radical, but it has raised the ire of New Hampshire’s political elite. Under the proposal, Iowa would remain the first caucus, and New Hampshire the first primary, but there would be one or two “diverse caucuses” wedged in between. The plan also calls for possibly adding one or two primaries before the date after which any state may schedule a vote—currently set at February 5—but after New Hampshire.

The reforms aim to change a nomination system that rewards aggressive fundraising, media pandering and mindless handshaking in a handful of non-representative states.

Decrying what they call the “perpetual privilege” of Iowa and New Hampshire, Commission member Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and the Michigan Democratic Party had originally called for a series of six regional primaries (later modified to four), with a different region launching each presidential nominating season. “We shouldn’t have a rule that some states are more equal than others,” Levin told the DNC commission.

Since the DNC’s announcement, state representatives from Florida to Oregon have scrambled to stake their claim to the early primaries. By April 20, just six weeks after approving the measure, the DNC had reviewed presentations from 11 states and the District of Columbia.

As it stands, the problems with the current delegate selection process can be traced to an aberrant relationship that emerged between candidates and the mainstream press following a 1969 decision by the two parties to shift to a system of state primaries and caucuses. The resulting system put way too much leverage in the hands of the media, effectively negating healthy discourse among the politically savvy. Consequently, what happens today in Iowa and New Hampshire determines which candidates will ride the media groundswell to nomination and which will inevitably fall by the wayside.

In a September 2005 report, the 21-member, bi-partisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, co-chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and fomer Secretary of State James A. Baker III, concluded: “The presidential primary system is organized in a way that encourages candidates to start their campaigns too early, spend too much money, and allow as few as eight percent of the voters to choose the nominees. The primary schedule is in need of a comprehensive overhaul.”

Carter and Baker called for congressional action if the political parties themselves do not act by 2008 and endorsed Levin’s modified proposal.

A group called Democrats For The West would like to see that plan put into action. Since 2004 they’ve joined the Western Governors’ Association, the Western States Democratic Chairs’ Caucus, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, and at least one Republican governor—Jon Huntsman of Utah—in lobbying for a western regional primary. Huntsman has signed legislation rewriting the state’s election law and has pledged $850,000 to the project.

Spearheading the effort for the Democrats is veteran Party activist Michael Stratton, a member of the DNC Commission that made the original recommendation. “The future of the Democratic Party lies out west,” Stratton says, arguing that if the DNC is going to add early primaries, it should be in areas with a strong Democratic tradition. “There are a lot of people who are hungry to come to the process,” Stratton says. “If we’re adding states to the mix, I think we are all concerned that they be places where we can in fact win.”

Throughout the summer, the DNC will continue to deliberate its primary reform project. The Rules and Bylaws Committee is scheduled to meet again in July to review the state proposals. In lieu of a regional primary, which now appears unlikely for 2008, Democrats For The West has appealed to the DNC to reserve at least one of the early slots for a western state.

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  I moved to Iowa last year in part to observe the early process here. In addition, I hope to influence the issues and solutions discussed. (I am developing a limited-run newsletter about women, politics, and change with emphasis on the 2008 election.)

  Already I have become very disillusioned by how much influence ordinary Iowans have in the selection process.  For example, I attended a reception for Sen. Evan Bayh recently but left before he spoke because the small gathering seemed to be more of a media event than an effort to meet interested citizens.

  I invite people to take a survey on primaries and caucuses that I have on my website: www.maggiefeld.com.

  Posted by SillyLeftist on Jul 20, 2006 at 3:10 AM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also featured Running on Empty
The New Funding Heresies
Was the Presidential Election Stolen?

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by Christopher Moraff

• Ten Years After Seattle
  The global justice movement evolves.Posted on October 19, 2009
• Protesting the G-20 Summit
  A photo essay from Pittsburgh's streets.Posted on September 26, 2009
• Putting a Stop to Stop Loss
  Pentagon ends the back-door draft, but critics fear a return with Afghanistan surge. Posted on April 23, 2009
• Bush’s Final Purge
  The lame duck gives dissenters in federal agencies a last round of pink slips. Posted on January 5, 2009
• Feeding the Beast
  In order to weaken federal agencies, the Bush administration has expanded them to the point of collapsePosted on August 18, 2008