Help In These Times raise $5,000 in two weeks! Donate now!

In These Times

PrintDiscuss
Features » March 14, 2003

After Miller-El, Mumia Abu-Jamal May Appeal

By Dave Lindorff

Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller
The Supreme Court’s Miller-El ruling could be a big break for Mumia Abu-Jamal, the black Philadelphia journalist on Pennsylvania’s Death Row since 1982.

The jury issues in the two murder cases are strikingly similar. In Miller-El, the Dallas district attorney used peremptory challenges to eliminate 10 of 11 qualified black jurors. The high court said this was evidence of possible racism on the part of the district attorney—something that has long been unconstitutional, but difficult to prove. In reaching its decision, the court’s majority cited a Dallas newspaper’s study of the district attorney’s use of peremptory challenges between 1981 and 1986, which both the newspaper and the court said suggested a “culture” of racism in jury selection. Lower state and federal appeals courts had consistently—and, in the view of the Supreme Court, improperly—barred this evidence from consideration.

Abu-Jamal prosecutor Joseph McGill similarly used peremptory challenges to eliminate 11 of 15 possible black jurors, resulting in a jury of nine whites and three blacks. Just over a year ago, a federal judge refused to consider several academic studies submitted by Abu-Jamal’s defense documenting a history of race-based jury selection by McGill and by the district attorney’s office as a whole during the 1978 to 1986 tenure of then District Attorney Ed Rendell.

A prominent Philadelphia public defender who did not wish to be identified says the Miller-El decision will give the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals no choice but to send the case back to a lower court, should Abu-Jamal’s attorneys appeal. Adds Robert Bryan, the San Francisco death penalty expert recently hired by Abu-Jamal: “Miller-El is of great significance in what I will be eventually presenting federally on behalf of Mr. Abu-Jamal.”
  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Dave Lindorff, an In These Times contributing editor, is the author of This Can't Be Happening: Resisting the Disintegration of American Democracy. His work can be found at This Can't Be Happening.

More information about Dave Lindorff
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl

  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    The problem with Abu-Jamal’s continued appeals is that none are based on whether he did or did not kill Daniel Faulkner.

    If anyone has read the statements of the recent “new witness” Abu-Jamal brought forward last year (perhaps in 2001) you see just how far removed from reality any of his ‘factual’ defences are.

    His own brother witnessed the death of Daniel Faulkner.  Mumia Abu Jamal has never attempted to present any testimony by his brother as to what he saw.

    Posted by Nus on Mar 26, 2003 at 9:25 PM

  • register a new account »Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.
     

    Retreive lost password »

Appeared in the April 14, 2003 Issue
Also by Dave Lindorff
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS

Popularity

Sites of Interest: Moving quote - movers • best online casinos • Printers • Debt Consolidation • Electricity Prices • Texas Electric Service • Texas Electric Rates • Texas Electric Companies • tattoos • Free Download of Computer Software • drug addiction treatment programs • Free Games • Diet • Geek Blog • Flash Games • Casino Bonus • pokerworld24.org • online casino

In These Times is published in Chicago. We’ve been around since 1976, fighting for workers’ rights, corporate accountability and progressive government. In other words, a better world. more

Copyright © 2009 In These Times