Boss got you down? Visit "Working In These Times," our new workers' rights blog.
PrintDiscuss
Views » August 8, 2006

Unexploded Ordnance: Our Legacy in Laos

unexploded bombs still killing people in Laos decades after Vietnam.

By Terry J. Allen

Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller

As the years pass and the men who dropped the bombs expire in their beds, the rate at which Laotians die from U.S. unexploded ordnance (UXO) rises.

Since the end of the Vietnam War, the millions of yellow cluster bombs that litter Laos have claimed more than three times as many dead as the World Trade Center attacks.

Thanghon is one of the “lucky” thousands who have survived. Sitting in a wheelchair, she talked through a translator in Vientiane, the backwater capital of a backwater country that lies curled like a sleeping cat along the Mekong River.

“I was working on the family farm and digging in the ground when a UXO exploded,” she says. “Two of my friends died.”

“I came to Vientiane for the amputations. It took three days and two nights by bus,” she continues. “I was at the point of death.” Thanghon lost both her legs and the use of one hand after a hoe struck a quarter-century-old “bombie.”

A member of the Liu minority, Thanghon, 40, grew up in a small village in Phongsali province. From 1964 to 1973, the United States bombed the area as part of its illegal and “secret” war to disrupt the Ho Chi Minh Trail and undermine the Viet Cong supply route into Vietnam.

During those nine years, Laos, a country the size of Oklahoma, absorbed 2 million tons of American bombs, more than all the munitions dropped on Germany during WWII. On average, a planeload of bombs rained down every eight minutes, around the clock.

The ironically bad news is that up to a third of the fragmentation devices failed to explode. Instead, they turned Laos into an obstacle course where death and dismemberment is the penalty for one wrong step or misplaced hoe. Anything—or nothing—can set off these anti-personnel bombs. Typically, the victims are farmers trying to eke out a living and children, who are attracted by the bright yellow balls.

The country’s scarcity of arable land and abundance of poverty are driving the rise in accidents. Desperate farmers must weigh certain hunger against incalculable risk to grow food in fertile but mine-laced fields.

Unscrupulous scrap metal dealers from neighboring Vietnam are cashing in. As metal prices increase, UXO are becoming a cash crop. Dealers entice Laotians to hunt shrapnel and bombs by lending or renting them metal detectors. Farmers who earn a few hundred dollars a year are gambling life and limb for metal that brings a few dollars a pound.

Laos is a desperately poor country with an inadequate health system and an average life expectancy of 59 years. The disabled here have few options unless they reach Vientiane’s National Rehabilitation Center, a dusty complex of rustic buildings on the edge of town.

It survives on a trickle of domestic and foreign funds, but the United States, which caused most of these injuries, has done little to redress the damage or prevent more. In a post-Cold-War world, Laos is an inconsequential anachronism with little strategic value and less oil. What U.S. policy there is toward Vientiane is largely in thrall to the Lao Veterans of America, a California-based group largely comprised of Hmong people recruited by the CIA to fight Communism.

The Hmong lobby opposes aid to Laos—even for clearing mines. In this—and the influence it wields in a few Congressional districts—Hmong interest groups resemble the anti-Castro Cubans: Each group so despises the current government that it would strangle the populace rather than bolster the rulers.

I ask Thanghon if she is angry at the people who dropped the bombs.

“No,” she says. “We don’t hate them, but we don’t understand why we were fighting. It is our bad luck to be bombed.”

Bad luck may explain a particular victim, but had little do with Washington’s decision to bomb a neutral country. As part of a Cold War strategy, Presidents Kennedy and then Nixon pursued the Laos campaign in secret, without the consent of Congress or the American people. In addition to the bombies, U.S. planes dropped napalm and dioxin—chemical weapons that persist today, poisoning land, water and people.

The Geneva Convention banning chemical weapons was only one legal nicety Washington ignored. The other was the secret war itself, which violated international laws prohibiting attacks on neutral countries. A member of the committee that impeached Nixon, Elizabeth Holtzman, argued at the time that the secret bombing campaigns should have been high on the list of Nixon’s impeachable crimes. Wary of turning the impeachment proceedings into a forum on the war, the committee omitted the issue.

That failure of Congress and the courts to stop an illegal war and to hold a president accountable for war crimes resonates today, not only for Thangnon and Laos’ current and future casualties, but for a new set of victims in Iraq, in the U.S. armed forces and in sequestered prisons around the world.

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Terry J. Allen, an In These Times senior editor, has written the magazine's monthly investigative health and science column since 2005.

More information about Terry J. Allen
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    i wonder if laos could sue america irresponsible for what it did in laos.

    Posted by isaki on Aug 9, 2006 at 3:13 AM

    UXO from WWl is still blowing up in France occasionally. I would assume a lot is out there all across Europe from WW2 as well.

    Nearly 45,000 people in the US die each year in car accidents.

    Let’s single out someone to blame for each and all, OK?

    So, Terry, did you buy your lunch or walk to work?

    Posted by whattheheck on Aug 9, 2006 at 4:21 PM

    Your connection between UXO and car crashes I must say is rather spurious. The decimation of rural indigenous populations has been a major US policy for the past 60 years and continues to this day. Perhaps there is a more fundamental question to be asked, i.e. why were these crimes perpetrated in the first place and I include the First World War in the scheme of things here also. I would also imagine instances of UXO explosions in France is minute in comparison with what is happening accross Indo-China today. Let us not forget the empirically true fact that if all post-war American Presidents were tried under the Nurmberg laws they would all have been hanged. That includes Bush!!!! I doubt the Laotian people would get very far with any attempt at legal proceedings particularly since Vietnam was forced to pay over 100 million dollars around 15 years ago just to be reintegrated into the economic system it initially tried to develop outside of. It was given a severe punishment beating for doing so and then forced to pay for it. Do we force rape victims to pay reparations to their attacker. No, we don’t!! Only on an international scale can such miscarriages take place without being reported or talked about. It is unfortunate but true nonetheless. Think before you talk whattheheck, and analyse your country’s grizzly history. I speak of course of its external behaviour. So while we may all agree on the potential for freedom being the greatest in the US, there is no correlation between its internal freedom and its external behaviour. Let us hope and pray a resolution can one day be found to this continuing worldwide problem.

    Posted by TonyB on Aug 9, 2006 at 9:13 PM

    Even if the Laotian people could attempt to get reparation for their human losses, it’s not about dollars, it’s about human decency. The USA has been acting for many years like a spoiled child who thinks he can break things because his rich daddy willl pay for them.
    If by freedom you understand the right to say whatever you want, I think that’s not as important as listening to what others have to say and take into consideration their views. Take for instance Irak or Lebanon. Most of the world are against those wars, including a great number of American and Israeli citizens but nobody cares, they continue killing innocent people, destroying infraestructure and getting ready to interfere in the politics of Latin America by hook or by crook.
    We are not impressed by the millions of dollars you boast about, or by the Pan where Green bills are cooked (funny, the name Greenspan seems to have represented that). Who controls the money your country prints to spread around the world like in a shopping spree?
    No amount of money can buy respect and you are losing it at a fast pace.

    Posted by Maria on Aug 9, 2006 at 10:26 PM

    Well you will surely be aware that everything revolves around money regardless of personal opinion. For instance I disagree inherently with the whole concept and believe it is the mainstay of greed. Pretty basic comments. However it was economics that will be the cause of interference in Latin American Democracy, it was economics that drove the United States into the jungles of South Vietnam. However much we may treat it with personal disdain. Therefore the bottom line in this probably terminal phase of human evolution is the dollar and the euro. It has been the deciding factor in the construction of the Axis of Evil. I am delighted that the US economy has been declining and I hope the rest of the world will follow. The sooner we can develop outside the system of greed then the sooner we can begin talking about human decency with any sense of reality. Diversity of opinion will be the mainstay of this and of course it should be respected, but it must also be informed.

    Posted by TonyB on Aug 9, 2006 at 10:48 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 35 posts.

Appeared in the August 2006 Issue
Also by Terry J. Allen
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS