Views » December 5, 2006

The Second Clinton Ascendancy

By Laura S. Washington

On a post-election edition of PBS’s “The News Hour with Jim Lehrer,” presidential historian Richard Norton Smith told Lehrer: “The Democrats clearly have an opportunity to demonstrate that they’re the Bill Clinton party. You know, historically, I think the real winner this week is Bill Clinton.”

Smith, a scholar in residence at George Mason University, argued that in recent years “we saw the Democrats veer off” to the wilderness of the left, much to the delight of the Bushies. But the 2006 election sweep, according to Smith, gives the Democrats “an opportunity, particularly with a new crop of moderate and relative conservatives, to reclaim plausibly the middle of the road. And if they succeed at that, I’m telling you, Bill Clinton looks like a prophet with honor.”

Got it. When I noted Smith’s point to my leftie friends, they all had to agree, though grudgingly.

So let’s acknowledge this Second Clinton Ascendancy, and move on.

Next: What does this move to the middle mean for Hill and Bill? In 2008, will it translate into a Hillary victory or a Clinton calamity? I surmise it will be a little bit of both. A nomination, but no coronation.

Speaking of coronations, Clinton faces the little problem of the “skinny guy with the funny name.” In 2004, Barack Obama was a lowly state legislator from the South Side of Chicago. In 2008 the freshman U.S. Senator has a good shot at becoming the first black president of the United States. The tea leaves are overwhelming me with their predictions. There is no doubt that he is going to make his presidential bid official in the next few months. No surprises here, but look for his top political guru, David Axelrod, to orchestrate a Wagnerian drama.

One troubling tea leaf for Obama could be the loss of another black rising star. In his run for one of Tennessee’s senate seats, U.S. Rep. Harold Ford of Memphis was defeated, by 51 percent to 48 percent, by former Chattanooga Mayor Bob Corker. Ford was vying to become the first black senator from the South since Reconstruction.

Ford’s loss might indicate that he fell victim to the sentiments of Southern whites who still can’t stomach an African American in high office. That’s bad news, the logic goes, for a black candidate who needs some Southern states to win the White House. Indeed, an election exit poll by the Associated Press found that 40 percent of white voters in Tennessee voted for Ford, compared with 95 percent of the state’s black voters.

But another culprit may be afoot here. Ford ran well to the right of his party. He carved out conservative positions on abortion, immigration and Iraq. He even voted for the Defense of Marriage Act. He catered to the holy rollers. Tennessee pundits and activists called Ford a phony. That might have been a key factor in his narrow defeat.

Obama could be headed in the same direction. He is also shifting to the right. Listen beneath the barrage of adoring arias in the national media and you’ll detect grumblings from the Democratic left. They are infuriated by some of the centrist stances he’s taken. For example, they say, he is ducking support of gay marriage in favor of civil unions. And earlier this year he voted for the federal Secure Fence Act of 2006, which will create a 700-mile wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Still, I predict that by 2008, the whiners will be vanquished. Obama is in the right place on what will be the signature issue of the 2008 presidential contest—the war in Iraq. On that, there is a clear choice between him and the Democratic Party’s other leading light. Even before the Iraq debacle began in 2003, Obama was a staunch opponent. Meanwhile, Clinton continues to backpedal on her 2002 vote for the war.

In the meantime, watch out, Washington. Look for the state of Illinois, particularly Chicago, to dominate the seats of power. Obama is just one of a wide and deep pack of clout-heavy characters from the Prairie State.

Take Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), who headed the Democratic Campaign Congressional Committee. The Deaniacs may caterwaul, but I give Emanuel full and unconditional credit for the 2006 Democratic “thumping.” This Israeli ballet dancer-turned-White-House-operative is expected to snare the chairmanship of the House Democratic Caucus.

Joining him is Sen. Dick Durbin, who becomes the Number 2 Senate leader. Jan Schakowsky, Jesse Jackson Jr., and Luis Gutierrez are also in line for leadership slots in the U.S. House. The Land of Lincoln is about to become the Home of the Heavies.

They all face a key challenge. They must resist using their newfound clout to exact partisan revenge. Impeachment is a tantalizing prospect for some, but I am salivating at the prospect of the Democrats reclaiming the middle, and letting the Bushies swing, ever so slowly, in the wind.

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
• Or win a subscription to In These Times by taking this short survey!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Laura, you are out to lunch on all points. This is the stupidest postelection analysis I’ve read in a progressive publication.
  Only 9 of Rahm’s 23 candidates won. Many more Dean candidates
  won in many more states and many more are progressive.
  22 of the 23 Rahm candidates were pro-war. Three million
  bucks couldn’t elect Tammy Duckworth in Rahm’s hometown !
  Think of that.
  So far Obama has been The Great Black Issue Dodger. He has
  no position on the war or most other issues of concern to voters.
  The US public is way to the left of him on the war and socialized
  medicine and many other issues. Many of his black constituents
  haven’t seen him since he was elected two years ago.
  Since when are the old establishment farts on Lehrer our experts
  on interpreting elections ?  Washington just mindlessly recycles
  the lowest of the lowgrade establishment nonsense to attempt
  to minimize the progressive victory and more importantly the big
  conservative defeat. After that appalling column pushing race based
  identity politics nothing from Laura Washington’s pen surprises me.
  What’s next, ITT ? Tom Sowell or Clarence Thomas ?

  Posted by blondemike on Dec 6, 2006 at 1:49 AM

  “Obama has decided to imitate Bill Clinton, except that he’s going to skip 1994 and jump right to 1995-1996″

  Well, sure. After all, he has to work on an accelerated schedule given that he’s just assured himself of being the first African-American one term president.
  Stephanie Mcnealy
  Famous Philanthropist Customer Service Team

  Posted by mcnealystephanie on Jan 26, 2010 at 10:28 AM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also featured We Are All Waiters Now
The Godless Fundamentalist
Outing is In Again

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by Laura S. Washington

• Obama Needs a Black Agenda
  The first black president of the United States cannot credibly govern without a… morePosted on December 11, 2008
• Honest Abe and Honest Obe
  Abraham Lincoln will rise again. At least that's what Democratic presidential nominee Barack… morePosted on October 28, 2008
• The Whole World Was Watching
  40 years ago this week, Chicago police battled protesters at the DNC. Two '60s radicals remember the madness, and look to Denver for change Posted on August 23, 2008
• Gun-toters in La-La Land
  The conservative answer to America's crime plague is to put more guns on… morePosted on July 10, 2008
• The Great Election Robbery of 2008?
  Come Nov. 4, the elephant in the polling booth is the possibility that… morePosted on June 19, 2008