Support ITT by donating used Apple computers. Please e-mail donatecomputers@inthesetimes.com!
PrintDiscuss
Views » January 9, 2007

Iraqi Health Care: Hostage to War

By Terry J. Allen

Zainab before the war

Tags   
Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller

Zainab may be one of the 655,000 Iraqis who would be alive today if the Bush administration hadn’t launched its criminally conceived and executed war. Violence caused most of the excess deaths. But 54,000 people died from non-violent causes, such as heart disease, cancer and chronic illness. They were victims of a health care system eviscerated by mismanagement, ill-placed priorities, corruption and civil war.

The body count does not come from the U.S. government—which either does not bother to track, or won’t release, the Iraqi death toll—but from a survey by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Baghdad’s Al Mustansiriya University, published in The Lancet.

Four years ago, just before the invasion, Zainab, age 10, sat small and dignified on a hard plastic chair in a featureless room in a Baghdad hospital. An IV dripped poison into her outstretched arm. Her leukemia was going into remission and she was pink-cheeked and doing well. Despite the shortage of medicine and care created by combined efforts of Saddam and U.S. sanctions, the medical system still functioned.

Pre-Gulf War Iraq was “believed to have the best health care system in the Mideast, so it had enough altitude that it could fall some and still survive,” says Gilbert Burnham, principal author of the Johns Hopkins survey.

Today, the country’s health care is in free fall. Most of the $1 billion that Washington transfused into the medical system has bled out through the open wounds of wars. Of the 34,000 doctors in Iraq at the time of the invasion, more than half are gone. Most fled the country; 2,000 were murdered.

“Senior doctors, especially surgeons, have left, and patients are seen by inexperienced physicians,” Dr. A., who requested anonymity, told In These Times. He left a Baghdad hospital in July to study in the United States.

Zainab may have finished treatment before the system collapsed around her and joined the 85 percent of childhood leukemia patients who survive. But this was March 2003, and, as you know, things would not be going well.

Today, patients like Zainab die daily from treatable illnesses and injuries. “That translates to more than 1,800 preventable deaths a year at [one Baghdad] hospital alone,” according to the Los Angeles Times, which quoted Iraqi physician Husam Abud: “[I]f we get cases of cancer, we can’t treat them. They’ll probably end their days here.”

Making things worse, the Ministry of Health is controlled by Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr’s movement, “ignorant people who know nothing about medical science,” a doctor told InterPress Service (IPS) reporters Dahr Jamail and Ali Al-Fadhily.

More than ignorant, the clerics charged with protecting Iraqis’ health are part of sectarian militias with military, political and religious agendas. The “guards” they place in hospitals are an ominous presence. “They are wearing Ministry of Health uniforms,” says Dr. A., “but everyone knows they are part of Sadr’s militia. Of course, they are armed with machine guns.”

Everyone suffers, but Sunnis disproportionately. “We have no medications or blood serum supplies,” Tariq Hiali, a health official in mainly Sunni Baqubah told the Los Angeles Times. “The Ministry of Health is not providing us with medications and medical equipment; they consider [us] terrorists.”

Which means fair game in the escalating civil war. One doctor told IPS that ministry-controlled militiamen have “divert[ed] the ministry into a death squad headquarters.”

“Sunni patients are being murdered; some are dragged from their beds,” CBS News reported. “A man was bringing his murdered brother to the [hospital] morgue. They asked him if he knew who the killers were and he said ‘yes.’ They shot him right there,” said a medical worker.

Little wonder that physicians like Dr. A have joined Iraq’s 1.6 million post-invasion refugees.

Medical personnel remaining in Iraq have shown dedication and courage. They face shortages, death threats and kidnapping, as well as inadequate supplies that increase mortality, patient suffering and nosocomial infections.

And when militias dispense “security,” simply providing care is dangerous. “A doctor was attacked by [Ministry of Health] guards in Al Yarmook Hospital because he was preventing the guards from interfering in the medical care,” says Dr. A. “The doctors complained to the ministry that they cannot work in such an environment, and they held a one-day strike.”

Increasingly, the whole country is a fatally hostile environment, where people like Zainab die routinely from bad health care and worse policies. If she did not survive Iraq’s medical free fall, she was a casualty of war, as surely as the 600,000 felled by bullets and bombs.

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Terry J. Allen, an In These Times senior editor, has written the magazine's monthly investigative health and science column since 2005.

More information about Terry J. Allen
Tags   
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Thanks again, Bush and you neoconmen.

    Posted by hawaii jack on Jan 9, 2007 at 8:16 PM

    About three years ago I started wondering if life had been better under Saddam.

    Michael Moore’s film was no very great shakes, but one image stayed with me—those kids playing football in the street.

    No helicopters, no gunfire, no bombs.

    Now just about everyone is coming around to accepting it was better under Saddam.

    What a waste.

    Posted by frog on Jan 10, 2007 at 2:55 AM

    Great point, frog, you’re right.

    Posted by hawaii jack on Jan 10, 2007 at 5:52 PM

    “Now just about everyone is coming around to accepting it was better under Saddam.”

    Except for the hundreds of thousands he murdered (using WMD - e.g., his gassing of the civilian population). And the ones he shredded in plastic shredders. Oh and the ones he ordered raped. . .

    Maybe much or Iraq is in bad shape now, but it was in bad shape before the invasion. The northern Kurdish region continues to be in pretty good shape (but to be fair, it was before the war, due to US protection).

    Posted by wolf on Jan 11, 2007 at 4:32 PM

    He never “murdered” hundreds of thousands using poison gas, he was in a WAR with Iran and both sides tossed in everything but the kitchen sink. When that ONE Kurd village was gassed in 87 or 88 Reagan Admin claimed it was IRAN that did it which a subsequent US Army War College Report confirmed. So, Wolf, yor neoconmen sources mislead you again. Iraq is in much WORSE shape four years after Bush’s invasion based totally on lies. You guys really need to get that rightwing hate talk radio out of your heads and your butts. Spare us the phony shredding and rape stories a la Tom Lantos mythical stolen baby incubators in Gulf Masscre One by the First Bush War Criminal.

    Posted by hawaii jack on Jan 11, 2007 at 6:23 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 17 posts.

Appeared in the January 2007 Issue
Also by Terry J. Allen
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS