Help In These Times raise $5,000 in two weeks! Donate now!
PrintDiscuss
News » February 8, 2007

Getting Vets Their Benefits Back

By Melinda Tuhus

U.S. Secretary of Veterans Affairs James Nicholson (L) testifies as Under Secretary for Health Jon Perlin (R) listens during a hearing before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Military Quality of Life and Veterans Affairs on Capitol Hill June 28, 2005, in Washington, DC.

Tags   
Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller

Rick Scavetta lives with his wife and young daughter in a small town near New Haven, Conn. He joined the Army at 18, in part to earn money for college, and served in the regular Army and then the Reserve for a total of 15 years, reaching the rank of Sergeant 1st Class. In 2005, his Reserve unit was called up, and he served a year in Afghanistan.

Scavetta says he made a firm decision to leave the military last February, and planned to use his GI Bill benefits to pursue a master’s degree in political science and to study Arabic at Southern Connecticut State University. But he was told in his exit briefing that if he deactivated—in military terms, “left drill status”—he would not be eligible.

“Imagine if someone told you, ‘We promise you these benefits if you serve your country,’ and you held up your end of the bargain for six years in the Reserve, a year or two deployed overseas,” he says. “It’s frustrating, especially since school can be a very grounding thing for a veteran returning from war.”

Scavetta is just one of the many vets Jack Mordente works with as director of Veterans Affairs (VA) at Southern Connecticut State University in New Haven. Mordente says he learned last May that the Department of Defense was telling war-activated Guard and Reservists that if they left paid drill status they would lose their GI Bill education benefits. “And in fact it’s not true,” he says.

VA representative Keith Wilson backs up Mordente’s interpretation. Providing a bit of history, he says that in 1985 Congress created GI Bill education benefits for members of the Guard and Reserve for the first time. Then, he adds, “During Gulf War I, some individuals in the Guard and Reserve were called up for active duty, which interfered with their ability to pursue their education. So Congress passed a law that allowed the delimiting date (i.e., eligibility deadline) to be extended for a period equal to the time they’re activated plus four months.”

Mordente says if a member of the Guard or Reserve knows he or she is eligible and files for the benefit, the Veterans Administration will pay it.

But the Department of Defense (DoD) interprets the law differently. Lt. Col. Steve Beller of the Army National Guard writes the Guard policies to implement Army regulations. He says that the Department of Defense, unlike the VA, interprets the law to restrict eligibility for benefits to those who remain on drill status.

“The general counsels of the VA and the DoD issued opposite opinions,” he says. The two departments are trying to resolve their differences, but until they do, Beller says, “We will continue briefing as our attorneys have stated, that those benefits terminate upon leaving Selective Reserve.” He adds, “The funding we get for bonuses, retention and the GI Bill is all in one pot. If we take that money and give it to a vet, that means there’s a soldier sitting in the desert to whom I can’t give a re-enlistment bonus.”

Scavetta knows he’s eligible, but has still run into roadblocks. “I applied for my GI Bill benefits in August,” he says, “and I haven’t heard anything from the VA. I tried to call them, and got redirected to a call center, and the voice says nobody’s available to talk to me and hangs up.” He’s putting his school expenses—about $1,400 per semester—on his credit card. “To not have a quicker delivery system for the benefits we’re entitled to is, quite frankly, bullshit.”

Besides serving veteran-students at SCSU, Mordente is also president of the National Association of Veterans Program Administrators, and through his organization he is trying to get the word out nationally. He says student vets make up more than 20 percent of the nearly 400,000 members of the Guard and Reserve from all branches of the military who have served in Iraq or Afghanistan since 2001. So far, the VA’s Wilson says the department has paid about 3,400 people under this provision, with a maximum payment of $300 a month. No one knows how many retired GIs haven’t applied because they’ve been told they’re ineligible.

“These are war-activated Guard and Reservists who sacrificed,” Mordente says. “And now they’re being told they’re not eligible for a benefit they are eligible for. It’s appalling.”

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Melinda Tuhus is an independent journalist with 25 years of experience in print and radio, including In These Times, The New York Times, Free Speech Radio News and public radio stations.

More information about Melinda Tuhus
Tags   
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    This is once again a sign that our system of democracy is broken. This is outrageous and Sen. Biden needs to hear about it. How can we say we are supporting our troops when things like this are going on? And I’m sure this is only the tip of the iceburg .When our govt. denies the benefits guaranteed to our well deserving men and women for their many sacrafices to this country and then honor them by by neglecting them is immoral and and shows not only a lack of class but is all so typically ugly of this administrations hypocracy. Get all the GI’s home safely and provide them with everything they need to rebuild their lives once home. If we dont then we all have lost our humanity.

    Posted by thomas m gardia on Feb 8, 2007 at 7:20 PM

    No vet benefits. Period. Time to cut off these killers.

    Posted by blondemike on Feb 8, 2007 at 7:29 PM

    There he goes again.

    This is the same blondemike who wants to release convicted murderers back into society. The guy who says the military never did anything to protect him. Now he wants to do away with any benefits — forget the contract — just cut them off.

    Well, As I recall Mike, you said you carry a .357 and now I know why. Better get a flak jacket as well — you must have one coming with your name on it.

    You’re a real sweetheart, Mikey.

    Posted by whattheheck on Feb 8, 2007 at 11:01 PM

    I wrote that I was opposed to KILLING convicted murderers or anyone else. That’s not the same as advocating their blanket release in less
    they have not had a fair trial as in Mumia’s case. Are Rush BlowBoy BimboHeads like you, WTH, as incapable of reading comprehension as
    you are of critcal thought ?  My advocacy of no vet bennies is CONSISTENT with my view that they do not now nor ever have protected me. Consistent, not in contradiction.  I never approved any friggin contract to give hired killers special benefits. NEVER.  If you are threatening me, WTH, name the time and place. Never lost a duel yet.

    Posted by blondemike on Feb 9, 2007 at 12:27 AM

    BM

    You are a sick joke.

    Posted by whattheheck on Feb 9, 2007 at 1:22 AM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 19 posts.

Appeared in the February 2007 Issue
Also by Melinda Tuhus
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS