Help In These Times raise $5,000 in two weeks! Donate now!
PrintDiscuss
Features » March 14, 2007

Preaching Revolution

A new evangelical movement offers lessons for the left

By Zack Exley

Rob Bell on the Nashville stop of the "Everything Is Spiritual Tour"

Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller

Recently, I blogged a series of essays titled “The Revolution Misses You,” in which I called for progressives to revive the forgotten dream of practical yet radical change. Friends and colleagues immediately scolded me for using “extreme” terms such as “revolution” and “radical.” “You’ll only alienate people,” they said. “This will come back to haunt you.”

At first, I was surprised by what felt like a dramatic overreaction. But I soon realized why I had fallen out of sync with the progressive mainstream on the use of the “R-words”: I had been spending time listening to and reading evangelical Christians who are preaching revolution.

In Grand Rapids, Mich., a 36-year-old evangelical pastor named Rob Bell regularly describes his ministry as “revolutionary,” “radical” and “an insurgency.” Far from alienating people with such language, Bell’s Mars Hill Bible Church draws thousands of new worshipers each year from the mostly conservative and white suburbs of west Michigan. In one recent sermon, available as a podcast from MarsHill.org, Bell tells his congregation that the only time Jesus speaks of God directly taking someone’s life is the Parable of the Rich Fool (Luke 12:13-22), a story about a man who builds bigger barns to store a surplus harvest instead of sharing it with those in need. He closed the sermon by listing a dozen places around Grand Rapids where congregants could unload their own surplus wealth.

In his book Irresistible Revolution, 30-year-old author Shane Claiborne, who is currently living in Iraq to “stand in the way of war,” asks evangelicals why their literal reading of the Bible doesn’t lead them to do what Jesus so clearly told wealthy and middle-class people to do in his day: give up everything to help others.

The popular evangelical Christian magazine Relevant, launched in 2003 by Cameron Strang, the son of a Christian publishing magnate, contains a “Revolution” section complete with a raised red fist for a logo. They’ve also released The Revolution: A Field Manual for Changing Your World, a compilation by radical, Christian social-justice campaigners from around the world.

Bell and Claiborne are two of the better-known young voices of a broad, explicitly nonviolent, anti-imperialist and anticapitalist theology that is surging at the heart of white, suburban Evangelical Christianity. I first saw this movement at a local, conservative, nondenominational church in North Carolina where the pastor preached a sermon called “Two Fists in the Face of Empire.” Looking further, I found a movement whose book sales tower over their secular progressive counterparts in Amazon rankings; whose sermon podcasts reach thousands of listeners each week; and whose messages, in one form or another, reach millions of churchgoers. Bell alone preaches to more than 10,000 people every Sunday, with more than 50,000 listening in online.

—————————————

But this movement is still barely aware of its own existence, and has not chosen a label for itself. George Barna, who studies trends among Christians for clients such as the Billy Graham Evangelical Association and Focus on the Family, calls it simply “The Revolution” and its adherents “Revolutionaries.”

“The media are oblivious to it,” Barna wrote in his 2006 book Revolution: Finding Vibrant Faith Beyond the Walls of the Sanctuary. “Scholars are clueless about it. The government caught a glimpse of it in the 2004 presidential election but has mostly misinterpreted its nature and motivations.” According to his research, there are more than 20 million Revolutionaries in America, differentiated from mainstream evangelicals by a greater likelihood of serving their community and the poor and oppressed within it, a more “intimate, personally stirring worship of God” in daily life, and a much greater chance of studying the Bible every day.

One indication that this movement is new, nebulous and spontaneous is that Gregory Boyd, a like-minded mega-church pastor two states away in St. Paul, Minn., knew nothing of Rob Bell’s theology until recently. He only heard of the pastors’ conference after the fact because his book Myth of a Christian Nation: How the Quest for Political Power is Destroying the Church was distributed to conference participants.

“There’s definitely something going on,” says Boyd. “I’ve only become aware of it as people have responded to my book. It’s not organized — it’s amorphic. It would include the ‘emerging church movement,’ but it’s bigger than that. It’s a vision of the kingdom [of God]. It’s a new kind of Christianity.”

Heather Zydek, the former “Revolution” section editor for Relevant magazine and the editor of The Revolution: A Field Manual for Changing Your World, says, “I definitely don’t have a name for it, but, yes, something is happening. Some people say it’s a Generation X — or Y — thing. But baby boomers are in on it too.”

Jim Wallis, the founder of Sojourners magazine and author of the bestseller God’s Politics, says, “‘Progressive evangelicals’ was thought to be a misnomer, but now we’re a movement.” He was as surprised as anyone when his 2006 book tour for God’s Politics began to develop the feel of a revival tour. At evangelical Christian Bethel University in St. Paul, Wallis spoke shortly after a rally held by Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family. More people attended Wallis’ event. “One of the Dobson organizers came over and told me, ‘If they make us keep focusing on just two issues [abortion and gay marriage], they’re going to lose all of us,’” he says.

Wallis has long been known on the left as a progressive evangelical voice in the wilderness. But in fact, over the past decades Wallis has had plenty of company, including Brian McLaren, Tony Campolo, Ron Sider and N.T. Wright, among others. And while this new generation has been inspired by many of those teachers, they do not have the same association with the organized left that some of their predecessors do. Shane Claiborne is one of the few young voices in this movement who at least knows the history of cross-pollination between the Left and Christianity, mentioning Catholic Worker founder Dorothy Day’s socialist origins in Irresistible Revolution.

Zydek characterizes the movement this way: “We want to get back to the roots of Christianity, to the essence of Christianity, which is about service to those in need, sacrifice, denial of self for others — it’s about [Jesus saying] ‘pick up your cross and follow me.’ But for too long we’ve spread a gospel of suburbanism, of self-centeredness, of capitalism, of political conservatism — but not the gospel: the gospel that came from Christ.”

—————————————

I had been a regular listener of Rob Bell’s sermon podcasts for a few months when he announced the January 20-21 “Isn’t She Beautiful” conference (“She” being the church). The invitation was open to “Church leaders, pastors, and basically just revolutionaries and insurgents from all over the world.” I signed right up.

I arrived at Mars Hill the evening before the conference, in a heavy snow, just in time to catch the regular Sunday night service. The Mars Hill church building is a converted mall. From the outside it looks just like any other old shopping center — they’ve never put up a sign. So when you walk in and see the teeming, logo-free community inside that has taken over every inch of this entire mall, you get the feeling that you’ve walked into an alternate universe. Imagine walking into a McDonalds to find your mom’s kitchen inside.

The sanctuary is a hollowed-out department store that used to host RV shows and swap meets — no decoration, just exposed aluminum walls, ducts and beams. As I walked in, a volunteer handed me a Bible. Three thousand people were on their feet, singing powerfully and worshiping in an explosive expression of collective joy that simply does not exist in the left of this era. There were certainly some “hipster Christians” in the crowd (tattoos, goatees, etc.), but overwhelmingly the congregants were mainstream-looking Michiganders.

Rob Bell finally took to the stage, sporting plastic-rim, hipster glasses, a white belt and cool shirt. He looks like a grown-up indie rock star (and used to play in a popular Grand Rapids band). The son of a Reagan-appointed federal judge, Bell graduated from Wheaton College, where male and female students live in separate dorms with curfews and are encouraged to abstain from physical intimacy. After receiving his M.Div from Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena, Calif., Bell interned at a conservative, non-denominational evangelical church in Grand Rapids, from which he launched Mars Hill as a “church plant” in February 1999. The name Mars Hill refers to the site where the apostle Paul preached to non-Jews by making the gospel current and relevant to their own culture.

On this night, Bell barely preached himself, and instead spent the evening, as he often does, interviewing a member of the church about how she was living out the gospel. She and her husband had moved to a broken inner-city neighborhood and begun a tutoring and family assistance ministry that is now in the process of expanding out of a church basement to fill an entire renovated warehouse.

If you compare the Mars Hill complex to progressive community centers or union halls, it has no rival. The entire mall has been converted. Most of the stores are now classrooms for the different grades of its enormous Sunday school. One of the large department stores has been converted into an events and youth meeting space with a stage, and ping pong and pool tables. The broad, carpeted concourse is now filled with comfy sofas and chairs for sitting and talking. Though the complex is perfectly clean and attractive, you get the feeling that the church, in renovating the facilities, has spent the minimum possible resources to meet functional needs.

More striking than the size of Mars Hill is the intensity of participation among the membership. The Mars Hill house church program — where small numbers of people come together in a home for Bible study, fellowship, mutual support and as a launching point for outreach into the community — involves more than 2,000 members in hundreds of groups, each with its own leaders. Several hundred volunteer as childcare providers and Sunday school teachers. And hundreds more serve each Sunday as ushers, parking helpers and medics. (With 3,500 people in a room, you never know what can happen.)

Yet Mars Hill is not atypical. According to the Barna Group, nine percent of Americans attend house churches (up from one percent 10 years ago). And tens of thousands of churches are de facto community centers, serving and supporting virtually all aspects of their members’ lives, usually with a significant percentage of members acting as volunteers. In this way, churches have left progressives in the dust in terms of serving and engaging people directly. The union hall is the left’s nearest equivalent, but not only is it dying, it rarely attempts to serve anywhere near as many of the needs — spiritual and practical — as churches do.

—————————————

Could the shift in focus from personal salvation to the building of the “kingdom of Heaven” be the inevitable result of the long rise of “back to the Bible” fundamentalism? Tens of millions of American Christians are not only reading the Bible, but getting together in groups and studying it — studying the historical context in which the authors wrote, the nuances of the original Greek and Hebrew, and the issues raised by translation and conflicting source texts.

Zydek says, “No matter how you pick and choose your favorite Bible passages, if you know that Jesus died on the cross for you, that’s going to affect the way you treat other people. If you’re a Bible-believing Christian, maybe you choose to emphasize evangelism or maybe you emphasize works, but you can’t ignore Jesus’ example of unconditional love on the cross.”

Next page »Page 1 of 2
  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Zack Exley is a senior strategist with OMP, a D.C.-based communications and fundraising firm, and co-founder of the New Organizing Institute. He can be reached at his Web site, www.zackexley.com

More information about Zack Exley
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    “In his book Irresistible Revolution, 30-year-old author Shane Claiborne, who is currently living in Iraq to “stand in the way of war,” asks evangelicals why their literal reading of the Bible doesn’t lead them to do what Jesus so clearly told wealthy and middle-class people to do in his day: give up everything to help others.”

    Jesus also commands him to kill all those who will not accept him as their king(Luke 19:26-27). Why isn’t he doing that?

    Because like all Christians he cherry picks. If you want to be Christian, you are required to believe all of it without question. Murder your sassy children, burn Red Lobster to the ground. Smite the non-believers and take their women as your slaves. The character of Jesus repeatedly endorses all of these things

    If you question, you lack faith and are going to hell. This is the all-powerful, all-knowing creator of the universe.
    If he wanted you to think, he wouldn’t have given you a book to tell you what to think, and sadistically punishing you
    for doing what he knew you were going to do from the beginning of time

    Or you can join the rest of us in reality.  The intellectual dishonesty of most people, whose rational brains fight against the ludicrousness and horrific things they see in that book is what allows fanatics like Robertson, Fallwell and Bin Laden to do their dirty work. Moderates breed extremists, it’s time to end religion in this world as the ludicrous fairy tales it really is, and for those who can’t stop believing on their own to get the mental help they so sorely need.

    Posted by WickyWoo on Mar 14, 2007 at 3:55 PM

    Thanks, WW. I’m so sick of these goddamn christculters and their irrational nonsense.

    Posted by blondemike on Mar 14, 2007 at 4:25 PM

    “You will know them by their fruits”—Matthew 7:16.  Therefore, as a non-Christian, I went to the Woodland Hills Church home page (the one in St. Paul, Minnesota, since I live in Minneapolis) to see how they act on their revolutionary impulses.  The sermon you mentioned was reported in July, according to the NY Times, so maybe they need more time to put up revolutionary activities on their web page.  Or maybe they have to go under the radar, like the pastor telling high-income members to pay their workers more or something.

    That having been said, Wooddale Hills Church’s home page looks no different (no better, but also no worse) than any other church home page, traditionally “progressive” (e.g. UCC, Unitarian) or otherwise, that I have seen.  They do a soup kitchen type thing—like many other churches including much smaller ones—and they help out elderly and handicapped church members—great, and again like many other churches.  They have a third world mission program that looks just like the one my mother went on for her moderate-to-conservative Methodist megachurch in the South.  They have a “biblical financial planning” course which really could be radical (if they tell high-earners to pay their workers more, that is) and if that is what it is, it’s understandable that they don’t say that on their web-based advertising for it, which just talks about normal financial planning things like debt and savings and charitable giving.  They have a rather humorous page attempting to “minister” to the Hispanic population of the Cities, which is growing, by trying to “present Christ” to them.  Last time I checked, most Hispanics in Minneapolis-St. Paul were Catholic, but I guess that means they aren’t Christian, right?

    Based on this admittedly cursory glance, I would have to say that they mostly seem to be plugging in as a small piece of the existing Twin Cities philanthropic community, of which I have been a (secular) member as a worker and a volunteer for years.  The Twin Cities is known for a vibrant nonprofit community, mostly progressive, and the reason you may not have seen 3,000 of us non-church-based workers and volunteers in one place, is because there are over a hundred different organizations we are spread out among, working all sorts of different schedules.  Of course, sometimes we are all in one place—Paul Wellstone’s funeral, antiwar marches, etc.  You can fill our basketball stadium if you present the right progressive political candidate—I’ve been there.

    Are church volunteers important to the battered women’s shelter where I used to work, and especially to Habitat for Humanity where I worked 10 years ago?  Sure!  Are they the only ones, though?  No—hell, even Habitat, which is explicitly an “ecumenical Christian organization” that accepts secular volunteers too, depends rather consistently on corporate volunteer groups (e.g. teambuilding exercises & corporate philanthropy) to get any work done during the week.  Are there flaws in our organizational structures, where we could learn things from any other group such as Wooddale Hills?  Sure!  Is there one big flaw, namely, that the corporate work-groups and corporate or high-income big donors that make a lot of this nonprofit community financially solvent, are the same people who could solve local poverty problems directly by paying workers more, or permitting unions?  Absolutely.  I make no claim that the nonprofit social service agencies are revolutionary, and I think probably we do need some new group that is.

    One thing about our existing nonprofit community here in Minneapolis-St. Paul, and our umbrella organizations like the United Way, is that most of them follow the letter and spirit of our state’s non-discrimination laws, including affectional preference and marital status.  Maybe I should stay where I am.

    Dave White
    Minneapolis

    Posted by davelwhite on Mar 14, 2007 at 4:31 PM

    In a free society there would be no nondiscrimination except to prohibit discrimination by a government agency.

    Posted by blondemike on Mar 14, 2007 at 6:39 PM

    Left out “laws” after “nondiscrimination.”

    Posted by blondemike on Mar 14, 2007 at 6:39 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 342 posts.