Views » March 22, 2007

Why Does CNN Suck?

By Susan J. Douglas

As the news media struggle to find equilibrium in an era of increased competition and decreased trust, we have some lessons that defy current conventional wisdom. The most important is that newspapers—yes, old, print-based, non-digital, non-instantaneous, so-1950s newspapers—still matter enormously. The other is that the outlet best equipped to provide instant 24-7 news, the cable channel—and CNN in particular—has become a massive failure, especially under the control of Time-Warner.

Does CNN really have no shame anymore? The day that Britney Spears shaved her head, the story seemed to be in a 6-minute rotation, lest inquiring minds somehow missed this irrelevant flotsam. The following day it was still a top story, CNN reminding us that her head was, yes, indeed still shaved, as if an application of Rogaine and Chem-lawn might have sprouted it back overnight.

Another minor scandal is how much attention CNN paid to the Anna Nicole Smith melodrama, bombarding us with Anna Nicole experts—how does one become an Anna Nicole expert?—while relishing the repeated use of the word “decomposing.” The Project for Excellence in Journalism (PEJ) has begun a news index on its Web site that monitors, in part, how the cable channels fill their news hole: The week of Feb. 4, when debates about U.S. policy in Iraq were 12 percent of the news hole, Anna Nicole filled 10 percent of it. Explained Wolf Blitzer, “That’s the only story we reported for two solid hours … we just couldn’t help ourselves.” By contrast, Anna Nicole was not in the top five stories covered in PEJ’s sample of newspapers. The following week, Anna Nicole continued to dominate the cable talk shows, with the likes of the ever-shrill Nancy Grace gnawing this bone of a story to its meatless end. Is it any wonder that public confidence in the news media continues to decline?

Almost every night, Jon Stewart makes fun of the cable channels, especially CNN. The network was reportedly bombarded by complaints about the wall-to-wall, breast-to-breast Anna Nicole coverage. But the ridicule and complaints seem not to matter: CNN, with a few exceptions here and there, continues down its slope of triviality, superficiality and sensationalism. On the day after the Libby verdict, CNN’s lead story at 9 a.m. was about the Mega Millions Lottery and who might win it. This was followed by advice on how to program your TiVo with your cell phone (hello?), and whether to take an aspirin a day or not. I never thought I’d say anything longing about Ted Turner, but CNN had more integrity when it was his baby.

Meanwhile, amidst all the hand-wringing about the death of newspapers, the Washington Post’s exposé of conditions at Walter Reed Hospital became a major story with legs. The independent press (including blogs) have been reporting about the medical neglect of returning soldiers for years, but the Post’s focus on the alleged gold standard of military hospitals and its sordid details about mouse droppings and “belly up cockroaches” showed that good old fashioned investigative journalism matters. And while post-mortems on the Libby case emphasized the toll it took on the press (not to be underestimated), few emphasized that it was The New York Times’ gutsy publication of Joe Wilson’s op-ed piece that, in fact, ignited this disastrous abuse of power.

The underlying issue here, as Bob McChesney and his organization Free Press note, is that the commercial business model of news organizations demands one thing: the highest possible profits and return on investment. Paula Zahn and others on CNN justified their Anna Nicole glut by saying that ratings had increased (despite survey results in which 71 percent said they were not interested in the story.) Wall Street, which is constantly anthropomorphized into some all-knowing Buddha, currently doesn’t “like” newspapers because their profit margins are no longer between 22 and 29 percent, an outrageously high expectation especially when compared to many other businesses. When proposals are floated to reduce expectations on profit margins back to, say, 10 percent, critics note that Wall Street would revolt, hostile takeovers by non-news types would flourish, and the news would be further destroyed. But can it get any worse?

It is of course a time of flux for the news industry as more people go to the Internet for their news and industry types try to figure out how to profit from that. (The increasingly intrusive ads suggest they’ve made plenty of progress in this area). But with a severely damaged presidency, an oppositional Congress, and a backlog of scandalous underreported stories—from the down-and-dirty about shoddy mortgage practices to the real conditions on the ground in Iraq for U.S. military and Iraqi civilians alike—this could be a great moment for the news media. But if they kowtow too much to the corporate suits, they will further lose their core audience, the one that sustains not only them, but also the ever-tenuous connection between journalism and democracy.

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Completely agree with Susan. I would add that CNN and all the cable and network media milk stories to the very last drop.  For instance, the piece about the young Boy Scout lost in the wilds of North Carolina was carried by CNN for more than 45 minutes yesterday (21 March) morning, while all other stories were put on the back burner.  .  They should have made a brief announcement that the kid had been found alive and then gone on to other stories, but no, they kept at it, beating it to death.  This is but one example.  There are many more. 
  Dr. Panglosss

  Posted by drpangloss on Mar 22, 2007 at 1:41 PM

  Were it so benign.  CNN seems to be on a path of not only trivialization, but of rightwingification.  They both work in tandem to prevent the public from getting the news it needs to take back our nation from its corporate masters. 

  And while it’s all well and good that some of us have the time and motivation to actually go and find things out on our own using outher sources, most of those folks Bush calls “uniquely American”—those working two or maybe three jobs to make ends meet since Reagan demolished the middle class—don’t have that luxury.  So they’re looking for a quick summary, and CNN, if left to do its will, is happy to mollify them on behalf of their right wing owners and sponsors.

  CNN has drifted right because the small highly vocal well funded minority has been loudly complaining.  We have to make them realize those people will never be satisfied, and with a loud and unanimous voice beckon them to return to at least a bare minimum of jouralistic standards.

  Posted by trippin on Mar 22, 2007 at 3:05 PM

  I remember when I was in college in the early 1990s and CNN was the gold standard for news. Those days are long gone.

  Posted by lams712 on Mar 22, 2007 at 3:35 PM

  I have been a fan of Susan Douglas for some time.  Her articles are always insightful and right on target.  I am currently on a one-person boycott of CNN.  Infuriated by the inane comments of Glen Beck and his obvious bias against Democrats and others who don’t completely agree with him; put off by Solidad O’Brian’s often snooty interviews; and finally, just plain exhausted by the Anna Nicole Smith obsession, I said, no more.  It’s too bad, because there are some neat and talented people with CNN, but over all, the Glen Becks and Nacy Graces and the tabloid content of most of the stories simply ruin anyone from wanting to tune in.  They sure did me.

  Posted by tem2007 on Mar 22, 2007 at 5:39 PM

  CNN is awful but it has nothing to do with the profit motive or that all purpose scapegoat here, the capitalistic system, but its own pragmatist ideology. Like the NY Times and The Washington Post, CNN wants to be near power. All three totally lied about the second as well as the first
  Gulf Massacre, I agree with Chomsky that these were one-sided massacres rather than wars. CNN was never the gold standard for news but it HAS gotten noticeably worse. The difference between them and Fox is getting narrow and of course, Brokaw, Rather, Jennings, ad nauseum, went along with the 9-11 hysteria as well as the Bush-AIPAC
  war. I used to work in an office building where the damn CNN was on all
  the time but don’t get cable at home, thankfully.

  Posted by blondemike on Mar 22, 2007 at 6:17 PM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 176 posts.

Also featured Biofuels: Promise or Peril?
Global Warming: Dim Bulbs, Bright Lights
This April Red + Blue Go Green

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by Susan J. Douglas

• Pitbullies of the Right
  By the time you read this, election day will be over and pundits… morePosted on November 24, 2009
• Women Reach a Breaking Point
  How tired are you of seeing a tiny minority of wingnut Americans--"birthers," "teabaggers,"… morePosted on October 13, 2009
• Killing Granny with the Laziness Bias
  Progressives have been wrong--overly idealistic--about the power of communication. Many of us cling… morePosted on September 17, 2009
• News Media ‘Acting Stupidly’
  The most exasperating, if utterly predictable, lesson from the Henry Louis Gates Jr.… morePosted on August 13, 2009
• Jon & Kate Plus Mindless Drivel
  Standing in the supermarket checkout line, I'm accosted by a slew of headlines:… morePosted on June 18, 2009