News » July 9, 2007

Iraqi Unions Fight the New Oil Law

“Written in the United States,” the law would permit joint ownership of many Iraqi oil fields by foreign companies

By David Moberg

An Iraqi worker shuts down a pumping tube at the Iraqi Pipelines Company is Basra on June 5. Employees there recently went on strike, shutting down two pipelines carrying oil and gas products inside Iraq.

Iraq’s proposed oil law, which would open up control of the country’s oilfields to multinational corporations, is one of the Bush administration’s top political priorities. On July 3, Bush called Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to encourage him and other leaders to move “aggressively forward” on it, and as In These Times went to press, its latest draft appeared headed to the Iraqi Parliament for debate. Even if it passes, however, enacting it won’t be easy, as it faces strong opposition from Iraqi oil workers.

“It doesn’t serve the interests of the Iraqi people,” says Faleh Abood Umara, general secretary of the Basra-based Southern Oil Company Union and the Iraqi Federation of Oil Workers’ Unions. Umara recently toured the United States, advocating both national control of Iraqi oil assets and immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.

Umara says that the law—”written in the United States”—would permit joint ownership of many Iraqi oil fields by foreign companies, which could export much of the oil and profits from these fields for up to 35 years under what are called “production sharing agreements.”

“We want the national Iraqi oil company to make service contracts with the companies, not partnerships,” Umara said in an interview, shortly after dedicating a plaque that extolled international labor solidarity at the Chicago monument to the Haymarket workers, whose protests in 1886 led to the declaration of May Day as the international workers’ holiday.

“We want new technology for the production of oil but to have foreign companies work with Iraqi workers and professionals for a limited time,” he says. “We are not opposed to being developed with advanced and imported technology, but we would like to be sole owner of our wealth and use it to develop our country and cities.”

The proposed oil law partly would govern distribution of revenue, which Umara says the oil workers’ unions want directed to a national redevelopment fund. But the Bush administration has long wanted to give foreign oil companies as much control as possible over Iraqi oil fields. Under the law, the Iraqi national company would have to compete with foreign companies for production rights, Umara says. Antonia Juhasz, an analyst for the watchdog group Oil Change International, says that the law gives foreign oil companies great flexibility, with no requirement to hire or invest profits locally, and opens the door to the long-term production-sharing agreements that other Middle East oil-producing nations have rejected as exploitative.

The oil workers’ opposition to the law could prove a serious obstacle to the already much-delayed legislation. In June, oil pipeline workers struck for a week “for the rights of workers and against the proposed law,” including demands on companies to live up to promises for profit-sharing, affordable housing construction and other benefits, Umara says. Although the government had frozen union assets, issued warrants for union leaders’ arrests and even worsened the old labor law from Saddam’s era—preserved by the Provisional Coalition Authority—Umara says the 23,000-member union, representing 36,000 workers, is growing stronger. In 2003, the union forced Halliburton out of the oil fields, which inspired port workers to oust the Danish shipping company Maersk from the docks.

The oil workers’ union also wants U.S. troops to start withdrawing immediately. “I’d rather they withdraw yesterday than today,” Umara says. “I assure you, chaos will not happen, and even if it happened, I’m very sure we can solve our own problems.”

Different religious and ethnic groups cooperate now in a Basra controlled by the Iraqi security forces, he says. While the average oil worker still worries about security, their main concern is the future of Iraq’s oil.

“Most important,” says Umara, “is not to let that new oil law pass.”

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Just one more sign, as if it were needed, that big oil dominates this administration. Who would have thought that two guys from the oil patch would have pandered so shamelessly to Exxon Mobil? Just those folks who had a brain and knew how to think.
  Remember when Shrub told us that revenues from the Iraqi oil fields would pay for this ego war? Guess that explains why the US is still borrowing money to pay for the ego war.
  But Shrub still grins and sleeps soundly every night. And to do that with the Shootist creating his own little world, shows how clueless Duhbya really is.

  Posted by farmer on Jul 10, 2007 at 12:49 PM

  One word - photovoltaics.

  Let’s end our reliance and exploitation of the crazies in the middle east. Let them live in the middle ages if they want, we need to extricate ourselves from them.

  It does not help that our “friends’ (Saudi’s) are among the worst of the bunch (it must really suck to be born female in that sad part of the world!).

  Posted by wolf on Jul 10, 2007 at 5:28 PM

  Nouri al-Maliki used Iraqi troops to break the strike in June and arrest the leaders. This shows that he is a US puppet. This issue means more to Iraqi oil workers than wages and conditions of work. This is most probably because the Oil Industry is Iraq’s chief foreign exchange earner and main export and determines the perameters of economic development for the country.

  The effort to sell off the oil industry also is an effort to split up the country and deprive the Sunni Triangle of development revenue. The twin goals of profit taking and controlling the course of Iraqi development has been opposed by the oil workers. This is understandable. The cause of controlling Iraqi oil is the core of the US cause for the invasion of Iraq in the first place.

  Posted by cabdriverinchicago on Jul 20, 2007 at 6:07 AM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also featured The Unions’ Man?
General Failure
Tranche Warfare

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by David Moberg

• Solidarity Reunited?
  Unions rally around shrunken UNITE HERE as it takes on its former ally.Posted on July 4, 2009
• Can a Union Divided Stand?
  UNITE HERE dissolves in conflict ... with a little help from SEIU.Posted on July 1, 2009
• Battling Over Employee Free Choice
  The fate of labor’s top legislative priority is in the Senate’s hands.Posted on May 28, 2009
• Flower Power
  Colombian plantation workers are fighting an uphill battle to unionize and secure better working conditions.Posted on May 3, 2009
• The Meltdown Goes Global
  It is time to rethink capitalism. Posted on April 15, 2009