Support ITT by donating used Apple computers. Please e-mail donatecomputers@inthesetimes.com!
PrintDiscuss
News » July 30, 2007

The Drug War’s Collateral Damage

Those victimized by a crackdown on marijuana since the early ’90s can be denied everything from food stamps to voting rights to the right to adopt a child

By Silja J.A. Talvi

Tags   
Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller

When a person is sent to prison for the first time on a drug-related felony charge, there is little chance that he or she will be told about the “collateral consequences” of their sentence.

The severity of these residual punishments depends on the state. “Life Sentences: The Collateral Sanctions Associated with Marijuana Offenses,” a report released in July by the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics (CCLE), ranks Florida, Delaware, Alabama, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Virginia, Utah, Arizona and South Carolina as the 10 states with the worst records for continuing the punishments of people who have already served their time.

“Life Sentences” author Richard Boire writes that the long-term sanctions for drug crimes, even for relatively benign drugs like marijuana, can exceed those of violent crimes like premeditated assault, rape and murder. Intense criminalization of drugs began with the Nixon administration, which ignored its own appointed “marihuana” commission’s recommendation that legalization for personal use was a logical alternative to costly and ineffective criminalization. The drug war intensified during the Reagan era and has since grown worse: Today, fully 45 percent of 1.5 million annual drug arrests are related to marijuana.

Up until the early ’90s, people who smoked pot were rarely arrested in large numbers. If sentenced, most users and small-time dealers did not face long sentences. That has changed. According to the Washington D.C.-based Sentencing Project, marijuana-related arrests jumped up by 113 percent from 1990 to 2002, while overall drug arrests only increased by three percent during that time. Meanwhile, the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) has linked smoking weed to everything from teen violence to terrorism.

“ONDCP’s crusade seems to get more incoherent and detached from reality every day,” says Bruce Mirken, communications director for the Marijuana Policy Project. “One minute they say marijuana makes you an apathetic slug, the next they say it turns you into a violent gangbanger. Neither has the remotest connection with reality, and these latest claims of a link between marijuana and violence are based on shameless manipulation of statistics taken completely out of context.”

Government-funded propaganda has been disseminated everywhere, from ads in some progressive magazines, to press releases regurgitated as “news” on cable stations like FOX News, to websites such as BlackNews.com, which recently posted an ONDCP article, “Early Marijuana Use an Early Warning Sign for Gang Involvement.” For all of its hoopla about the consequences of drug use, the ONDCP hasn’t shown an interest in documenting the problems faced by those convicted of felony drug charges after release.

Job applicants must inform potential employers, upon request, of past felonies, no matter how long ago they happened. The resulting job discrimination pushes many former prisoners back into the underground economy, contributing to the fact that two-thirds of former prisoners recidivate.

Former drug-related offenders have been further punished by stipulations signed into law in 1996, without congressional or public debate, as a part of the Welfare Reform Act. Former convicts can now be denied public housing, food stamps, Temporary Aid for Needy Families and scholarships for higher education. Other limits on freedoms include the denial of vocational licensing and certification for some professions, voting rights, suspension of driver’s licenses—regardless of whether the offense had anything to do with an automobile—and lifetime bans on the adoption of a child.

Equally serious is that incarcerated men and women, especially those who do not have the physical size or prowess to fight off predators, can be extorted, bullied, beaten, molested or raped by guards and fellow inmates. “Stories from Inside: Prison Rape and the War on Drugs,” a study released earlier this year by Los Angeles-based Stop Prisoner Rape, estimates that as many as one in four female and one in five male prisoners experience sexual violence while incarcerated. The real numbers are likely to be higher because of underreporting related to fear of repercussion or stigma.

“While anyone can be a victim of prisoner rape,” the report states, “inmates convicted of a non-violent drug offense typically possess characteristics that put them at great risk for abuse. They tend to be young, unschooled in the ways of prison life, and lacking the street smarts necessary to protect themselves from other detainees.”

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Silja J.A. Talvi, a senior editor at In These Times, is an investigative journalist and essayist with credits in many dozens of newspapers and magazines nationwide, including The Nation, Salon, Santa Fe Reporter, Utne, and the Christian Science Monitor.

More information about Silja J.A. Talvi
Tags   
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    One does have to wonder: whose idea is it to lock up all of these non-violent drug users and why? One might have hoped we would have learned our lesson during prohibition. Whatever the reason(s), i would prefer not to have to pay the bills for this insane policy. . .

    On the other hand, by having this (foolish) war, we are are now tops in locking up our own citizens, even beating out China in this nasty statistic.

    Posted by wolf on Jul 30, 2007 at 6:45 PM

    Here’s where an amnesty could do some real good — for everyone. Let them out and wipe the slate.

    Legalize drugs and classify the same as alcohol adiction. Offer treatment for anyone who wants to kick the habit. 

    Without the artificially high price (which banning adds to anything) people from Afghanistan to Columbia would go to raising healthful crops, the gang wars would need to find some other commodity to push and many of the “children” would stop shooting each other.

    Posted by whattheheck on Jul 30, 2007 at 7:52 PM

    Yup, a criminal waste of police time, taxpayers’ money, prison space (put the violent ones in, let the stoners out!). And it’s based on a foolish premise, that I have the right to command what shall go on within the privacy of your own skull.

    Plus, it makes bad guys filthy stinkin’ rich, and more dangerous than they already are. Black market profits, the sky’s the limit. You know who doesn’t want decrim? The contraband cartels!

    “Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man’s appetite by legislation, and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded.”
    Abraham Lincoln (1809-65), U.S. President.
    Speech, 18 Dec. 1840, to Illinois House of Representatives

    (and ya know, if some dumbass devotes his whole attention to grass, such that he loses his job and lives like a lowlife, he probably would have messed himself up on something else, even if he never got near the herb!)

    Posted by Kuya on Aug 2, 2007 at 8:53 AM

    Has the decriminalization movement made any headway in forty years?  Sometimes I think that I would rather see the neo-fascists succeed in destroying this country because there is nothing worth preserving.  The “me” generation is giving way to the “I” generation and all Americans care about is their own wants.

    Crumbling infrastructure, insane criminal laws, regressive taxation, religious control of government, we might as well be a third world country.

    Posted by wickeddog on Aug 7, 2007 at 10:54 PM

    Nothing worth preserving? Man, you gotta get out more. This is arguably the greatest nation ever! But by composed of imperfect humans, it is of course flawed in many ways. . .


    Just be glad you were born here. In most of the world attitudes like yours would make you end up dead. (Gotta love freedom of expression!)

    Posted by wolf on Aug 9, 2007 at 2:06 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 12 posts.

Appeared in the August 2007 Issue
Also by Silja J.A. Talvi
  • De-escalating the Drug War
    Obama's pick to head ONDCP is better than your average drug czar.Posted on March 13, 2009
  • Ending the War on Drugs
    Will the Obama administration put justice back in the criminal justice system?Posted on March 2, 2009
  • Our Town vs. Exxon
    Marine biologist Riki Ott explains how Cordova, Alaska, rebounded 20 years after the oil spill. Posted on February 20, 2009
  • All Work, No Play
    Vacation time shouldn't be the privilege of a few, but the right of all Posted on October 22, 2008
  • Reporting From The Ground Up
    The power of street reportingPosted on June 28, 2008
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS