Make a tax-deductible contribution today and get exclusive Vonnegut gear!
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Features > October 10, 2007 > Web Only

Feeding the Hungry is a Crime

City councils are cracking down on charity groups that feed the homeless without a permit

By Megan Tady

A homeless man serves himself a plate of cooked greens near the 'Liberty Cafe,' a makeshift kitchen built by activists in a vacant lot in Miami's Liberty City last year.

Tags   

The stake-out was almost comical in its absurdity: On April 4, 2007, undercover police counted how many times Eric Montanez, a 22-year-old volunteer with Food Not Bombs, dipped a serving ladle into a pot and handed stew to hungry people.

Once Montanez had dished up 30 bowls, the police moved in, collecting a vial of the stew for evidence as they arrested him for violating an Orlando, Fla., city ordinance: feeding a large group. Two days into his trial yesterday, Montanez was acquitted by a jury of the misdemeanor charge, but was cautioned to obey the law.

As activists celebrate the verdict, the Orlando Police Department has said it will continue to ordinance, making the fight for the free flow of food in the city far from over.

“He is on trial for the crime of feeding the homeless—literally,” says George Crossley, a member of the Stop the Ordinance Partnership (S.T.O.P.), an alliance of 19 advocacy groups, including Orlando branches of Code Pink, the NAACP, and the National Organization for Women.

What Crossley and others are trying to stop is a “large group feeding” ordinance passed in July 2006 by the Orlando City Council that essentially bans groups from providing food to more than 25 people in downtown parks without a permit.

Under the ordinance, groups can only obtain two permits a year per park for the purpose of sharing food with a large group. Although the ordinance does not explicitly target the homeless, the guillotine falls on their heads, as they are largely the benefactors of churches, charities and activist groups serving free food in easily accessible parks.

“Eric’s arrest shows both the heartlessness of Orlando towards the destitute and those who aid them,” the Orlando Food Not Bombs (FNB) chapter said in a statement in April.

Just as Orlando is cracking down on free meals that make life more bearable for homeless people, so too are other cities. This month, West Palm Beach, Fla., passed a similar ordinance that criminalizes feeding the homeless in public places, and last week officials in Cleveland, Ohio, prohibited groups from sharing food in the city’s Public Square. In February, a man in Jacksonville, Fla., was given a citation for handing out food to the homeless without a permit, though it was later thrown out. And FNB says fear is spreading in Albuquerque, N.M., that city officials may pass a similar ordinance, which has long been an avenue used to force out homeless people.

Volunteers and activists are decrying the laws, calling any measure that keeps free food out of the hands of the needy inhumane.

“It’s essentially saying that homeless people are not worthy of attention or respect and they’re nothing more than pigeons who should be fed some place else so they’re not a bother to mainstream society,” says FNB Co-founder Keith McHenry.

McHenry says feeding the homeless is part of a larger social justice agenda.

“There’s a broader principle in America that we’re trying to address, and that is, food is a human right, not to be relegated to being a commodity,” McHenry says. “People who are hungry in this country deserve good, nutritious food without having to go through a lot of bureaucratic hurdles to get that food, and without having to be demeaned.”

As with the other city ordinances, Orlando designated a specific area away from downtown businesses where groups could offer food without a permit. But McHenry says the purpose of visibly feeding homeless people is to draw attention to the problem, and that FNB rejects hiding a situation that the city refuses to confront compassionately.

“They say, ‘If you want to feed people, why don’t you do it out of sight?’” McHenry says. “That’s not our goal. Our goal is… to change society.”

The designated area in Orlando, however, is gated and groups must notify the authorities to unlock the space before every food sharing.

Brian Davis, director of the Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, says Cleveland police notified the group on October 3 that groups and churches could no longer provide food in the Public Square because of health hazards. Davis was told the city had discovered rat holes at the park. The Cleveland City Council did not return calls seeking comment.

According to a recent blog post by Davis, “The Chief of Police and the entire command staff stopped a group from unloading their food on the Square. Then they tried to move to another park and that did not work because law enforcement stopped them. The group was told that if they unload that they would be arrested.”

The groups were also given an alternate site for food sharing, but Davis told In These Times, “It couldn’t be a worse place to go.”

Shawn, an FNB volunteer in Cleveland reluctant to give his last name, says the regulation on feedings in the park is taking a toll. “What [the ordinance] has accomplished is probably diminished the amount of people getting fed when you’re forced to move to a location that’s too far for people to walk to,” he says.

Shawn says FNB would return to serving food in the Public Square. “It hasn’t stopped us,” he says. “There should be no law against feeding people.”

But feeding people, says McHenry, is bad for business. As tables of free food attract a larger than usual number of homeless people to city parks, nearby businesses fear their revenue streams may suffer.

“[Business owners] believe that people won’t shop in those neighborhoods. They’re not attractive,” McHenry says.

He also says cities fear the presence of readily available food will bring more homeless people into their community, and “they’ll have to raise tax money to provide affordable housing and public assistance and shelters.”

Heather Allebaugh, constituent correspondent for the City of Orlando, says the city council enacted the ordinance in response to “complaints from residents and businesses immediately following the feedings of activity and drug use around the area.”

Allebaugh also says the ordinance was designed to help maintain the parks. “It’s a balance between the residents and their safety when they come to the park when the feedings are taking place,” she says.

In response to criticisms that an ordinance curtailing the availability of free food is inhumane, Allebaugh says the measure is “not a ban, but a regulation.”

“It’s just about maintaining a regulation just as we do for parades and garage sales so we have an idea of what’s happening at public parks,” Allebaugh says. “Maybe there’s extra security needed for the people attending. Maybe they need extra trash receptacles. It’s just to help us manage events that are happening within our city. I don’t think it was targeted at any group. It was more about the proper location to feed, rather than whether to ban feeding.”

The city did not enact any provisions to feed the homeless people who relied on the routinely accessible free food. Allebaugh says such services do not fall within the jurisdiction of the city.

The crackdown on food sharings follows other policies designed to penalize and ostracize homeless people. Orlando’s estimated 9,000 homeless people are subject to laws that prevent them from lying on benches and from panhandling during certain hours. Cleveland recently enacted a law that sets a 10 pm curfew at the city’s Public Square, intending to stop people from sleeping in the park.

“[The City Council] is brutal about this,” says Crossley of S.T.O.P. “This is not a game to these people. They’re not trying to find a solution to why these people are out there.”

Allebaugh counts, however, that the council is addressing homelessness through a regional commission expected to issue “findings and suggestions” in February on how to “address homelessness and hopefully come up with a 10-year plan to end homelessness.”

The harsh treatment of homeless people also comes as the number of displaced people rises. On Monday, the Associated Press reported that there are an estimated 750,000 homeless people in the United States, although the figure is difficult to pinpoint.

“The criminalization of homeless people shows that there’s no political will by our society to deal with the crisis in a humane and logical way,” McHenry says. “The reality is that homeless people are regular Americans who lost their jobs due to all the different policies that are happening, like outsourcing, and the huge redirection of our infrastructure toward the military and away from things like education and health care.”

Despite the ordinances, and the recent arrest of Montanez, activists are refusing to back down. Coinciding with Montanez’ trial, Orlando FNB has been holding a three-day event with multiple food sharings that violate the ordinance. Crossley says more than 100 people were served breakfast on Monday. As of press time, no other arrests have been made.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, representing the First Vagabonds Church of God and FNB, filed suit against the Council last October, calling the ordinance unconstitutional. In 2006, a federal court judge issued an injunction on a Las Vegas measure that prohibited “providing food or meals to the indigent for free or for a nominal fee.”

McHenry says he thinks the ordinances will spur a new wave of activism. “People are already going to Orlando to risk arrest because they’re so outraged,” he says.

Crossley says volunteers already in Orlando have no plans to back down.

“Are we going to keep the fight up? You bet,” he says. “There’s not going to be any give on the part of the progressive community. The only way that S.T.O.P. would disband would be if the ordinance was repealed or defeated.”

Megan Tady is a National Political Reporter for InTheseTimes.com. Previously, she worked as a reporter for the NewStandard, where she published nearly 100 articles in one year. Megan has also written for Clamor, CommonDreams, E Magazine, Maisonneuve, PopandPolitics, and Reuters.

More information about Megan Tady
Tags   
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    This could be just an over reaction on the part of persons unknown with the police doing what they are hired to do —enforce the law. Or a chance for S.T.O.P. to capitalize on a situation to promote their group. A lot of people are being funded to do feel good kinds of jobs.

    Paying someone to Walk-for-Whatever-Cause would make more sense if the participants were doing something constructive, say getting a donation for each window washed or bag of trash collected, but....

    Solutions seem so simple that there must be underlying motives on each side.

    OK, there’s a problem. Where’s the logic in this stupid situation?

    The city would probably be liable for any ill effects from food distributed on city property. Remember when there were teeter-totters, swings and steel slides in city parks?

    If a pot and ladle were left out for people to serve themselves would it pass for thievery,? How about just having the Health Dept. inspect the “kitchen”?

    The fact that the “perp” was released says someone sees the arrest as futile.

    Everything is interrelated, now more than ever and on a larger scale.

    In Illinois 400,000 mental patients who were OK as long as they got their meds regularly were released. They didn’t get their meds and guess what — we had a big increase in homeless people.

    When we were told NAFTA would only cost the low-end jobs we made no provision for shipping the people who held those jobs here to foreign parks and fields, so guess what — they’re here and they still need to eat.

    Posted by whattheheck on Oct 10, 2007 at 7:47 AM

    Tis but the tip of the proverbial iceberg of poverty yet to engulf your nation, sub-prime mortgage slide into bankruptcy syndrome inflicting much of America will further enhance the need for ‘soup kitchens’ much like what happened prior to and a long time after the ‘infamous’ devastating depression of 1929.

    Have you ever checked out the facts behind that? The cretins [a certain grand-pappy Bush is a hint] behind the banks who called in loans and mortgages and became super rich while the country starved for jobs, food, and a place to call home.

    Don’t forget, those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Sad, so so sad; it’s already too late. But you can http://ecosyn.us/Bush-Hitler/Blogspot/Samuel_Bush/Remington_Arms.html
    Follow the Money!

    Posted by neilemac on Oct 11, 2007 at 9:45 PM

    neilemac,

    It looks as though you and I may soon have the same limited choice of candidates to rule over us as a behind the scenes economic scheme plays out.

    NAFTA is progressingly merging us into an amalgam of Mexusda. I had a couple of years of Spanish, guess I’ll buy a few French tapes and phrase books.

    We’ll get your government health care and you’ll get our government debt. Sorry about that.

    At least now that the two dollars are equal it will save time figuring the bills.

    Posted by whattheheck on Oct 12, 2007 at 7:01 AM

    ..."you’ll get our government debt.”

    For sure, and that would be paid to the Federal Reserve. Every dollar spent by the US is paid back with interest to them.

    Apart from the debt about to consume both our nations, your ‘Constitution’ and our “Charter of Rights” will become redundant. With the way ‘the decider’ has ‘in-lawed’ torture and a host of other liberty robbing policies, those corner stones of our democracies are probably already gone.

    Some seem to think that Al Gore may now enter the race for President; can’t say it will make a difference; ask Gore Vidal....

    *"I say very mildly, we have only one political party in the United States, the Property Party, with two right wings, Republican and Democrat.
    *see The Nation article http://www.thenation.com/doc/20040913/vidal

    Posted by neilemac on Oct 12, 2007 at 1:32 PM

    neilemac,

    While I don’t like to use labels since they seem blurred from what they should indicate, I guess it is fair to say I have been a life-long conservative. (Most self-employed get that way if not born so.)

    I assume your use of “redundant” is the same as our London friends — retired or obsolete. My occupation became redundant as “globalization” and price trumped loyalty and service.

    I have reread our Constitution many times in recent years and noted how far we have strayed from the short statement of purpose known as the “Preamble”.

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
    (Interesting which words they chose to capitalize.)

    These are the things I wish to conserve.

    In my nearly 70 years too many of those in governing positions have taken to pushing their ideas of how power should be used. Whether left or right, capitalist, communist or any other “ist” — no organization can do essentially good things while diminishing or ignoring the rights of individuals.

    Hitler tried it “for the good of the Fatherland.”

    Mao tried it “for the good of China.”

    We now know from experience what should have been obvious — democracy can’t be imposed “for the good of” anyone.

    There have always been those who get on the band wagon for personal gain, but when greed runs rampant a country loses its nationhood and regresses into those with and those without. It has been happening at an increasing pace and seems now to be of international scope.

    Posted by whattheheck on Oct 13, 2007 at 7:36 AM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 16 posts.

Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Also by Megan Tady

Your financial support of In These Times is critical, because as a non-profit, we rely on donors like you who know that In These Times will never cede the debate to the right and its corporate allies.

Donate now and get a Kurt Vonnegut mug or t-shirt!

Popular Discussions