News » August 25, 2003
Market Up, Jobs Down
Working people face more hard times
When second-quarter economic reports came out at the end of July, President Bush stepped forward to take the credit. “Because this administration has acted firmly, our economy is growing,” Bush said at a rare press conference.
Bush’s claims were accompanied by reports from the media and opinions from economists that suggested that the economy may finally have turned a corner. “Second-quarter growth, fewer jobless claims renew confidence,” headlined the Akron Beacon-Journal on August 1.
“Meanwhile, the latest weekly figures for initial claims for unemployment benefits may be signaling that conditions in the lackluster U.S. labor market are beginning to improve,” summarized the Washington Post, citing unidentified “analysts” in another August 1 story.
Unfortunately, for workers in the United States, the reality is nowhere near as positive as the celebration suggests. In fact, like the Bush tax cuts, the good news will mean little or nothing to workers who have lost their jobs or are worried about what comes next.
Even an unemployment rate that has risen to above 6 percent in the last few months, after averaging 4 percent for all of 2000, tells only a small part of the story. In the last two and a half years, there has been a qualitative change in the labor market. The country has gone from a time in which jobs were relatively plentiful and wages were rising for most workers, to one in which workers must struggle to find even the lowest-paying jobs. For most workers, wages are now barely keeping pace with inflation, and with employers reducing or eliminating health coverage, even workers with jobs often find themselves worse off than they were two years ago.
And while the overall unemployment rate has risen by slightly more than two percentage points since 2000, it has risen far more for minorities. The rate for African-Americans rose by almost four percentage points, from 7.6 percent in 2000, to 11.1 percent in the July employment data. For Hispanics the unemployment rate went from a year-round average of 5.6 percent in 2000 to 8.2 percent in the July data. And, the unemployment rate for African-American teens has risen by close to 12 percentage points, going from 24 percent in 2000 to 36 percent in the most recent data.
In addition to the people counted as unemployed, the number of people who are working part time but would like full-time work has risen by nearly 1.5 million since 2000.
Millions more have simply given up looking for work altogether. The percentage of the population counted as being in the labor force (either working or unemployed) has fallen for nearly every demographic group. In the case of African-American men, the labor force participation rate fell by almost three full percentage points from a peak of 74 percent in February 2000 to 71.3 percent in July. This drop translates into 200,000 black men leaving the labor force. The participation rate for black teens has fallen even farther, from over 41.4 percent in November 2000, to just 32.3 percent in July.
The one exception to this pattern has been workers over age 55. These people have been entering the labor market in large numbers over the last two years, even as overall employment has plunged. The obvious explanation is that many early retirees have been forced back to work, often at McDonald’s-type jobs, after their savings plunged with the stock market crash. In many cases, these older workers are displacing teenagers who would otherwise hold these jobs.
The weak labor market has virtually stopped real wage growth. In the second half of the nineties, wages were outpacing inflation by almost two percentage points a year. This was the first sustained period in which real wages were rising since the ’60s. However, in the last year, wage growth has slowed to the point where wages are moving at approximately the same rate as inflation. Since the inflation indexes do not pick up additional health care costs that employers pass along to workers, it is likely that most workers’ wages are not even keeping pace with their cost of living.
The economy has lost more than 2.6 million jobs in the last two and a half years. Until it starts generating jobs again at a rapid pace, the situation will only get worse for most of the work force. Unfortunately, the bursting bubbles, like the collapse of the stock market, that led to the recent recession have counterparts still to come—the housing bubble is yet to burst. This means that, for working people, the times are likely to get worse before they get better. It appears, too, that those hardships will go unnoticed by the president, unacknowledged by investors, and underreported by the media.
Bush’s claims were accompanied by reports from the media and opinions from economists that suggested that the economy may finally have turned a corner. “Second-quarter growth, fewer jobless claims renew confidence,” headlined the Akron Beacon-Journal on August 1.
“Meanwhile, the latest weekly figures for initial claims for unemployment benefits may be signaling that conditions in the lackluster U.S. labor market are beginning to improve,” summarized the Washington Post, citing unidentified “analysts” in another August 1 story.
Unfortunately, for workers in the United States, the reality is nowhere near as positive as the celebration suggests. In fact, like the Bush tax cuts, the good news will mean little or nothing to workers who have lost their jobs or are worried about what comes next.
Even an unemployment rate that has risen to above 6 percent in the last few months, after averaging 4 percent for all of 2000, tells only a small part of the story. In the last two and a half years, there has been a qualitative change in the labor market. The country has gone from a time in which jobs were relatively plentiful and wages were rising for most workers, to one in which workers must struggle to find even the lowest-paying jobs. For most workers, wages are now barely keeping pace with inflation, and with employers reducing or eliminating health coverage, even workers with jobs often find themselves worse off than they were two years ago.
And while the overall unemployment rate has risen by slightly more than two percentage points since 2000, it has risen far more for minorities. The rate for African-Americans rose by almost four percentage points, from 7.6 percent in 2000, to 11.1 percent in the July employment data. For Hispanics the unemployment rate went from a year-round average of 5.6 percent in 2000 to 8.2 percent in the July data. And, the unemployment rate for African-American teens has risen by close to 12 percentage points, going from 24 percent in 2000 to 36 percent in the most recent data.
In addition to the people counted as unemployed, the number of people who are working part time but would like full-time work has risen by nearly 1.5 million since 2000.
Millions more have simply given up looking for work altogether. The percentage of the population counted as being in the labor force (either working or unemployed) has fallen for nearly every demographic group. In the case of African-American men, the labor force participation rate fell by almost three full percentage points from a peak of 74 percent in February 2000 to 71.3 percent in July. This drop translates into 200,000 black men leaving the labor force. The participation rate for black teens has fallen even farther, from over 41.4 percent in November 2000, to just 32.3 percent in July.
The one exception to this pattern has been workers over age 55. These people have been entering the labor market in large numbers over the last two years, even as overall employment has plunged. The obvious explanation is that many early retirees have been forced back to work, often at McDonald’s-type jobs, after their savings plunged with the stock market crash. In many cases, these older workers are displacing teenagers who would otherwise hold these jobs.
The weak labor market has virtually stopped real wage growth. In the second half of the nineties, wages were outpacing inflation by almost two percentage points a year. This was the first sustained period in which real wages were rising since the ’60s. However, in the last year, wage growth has slowed to the point where wages are moving at approximately the same rate as inflation. Since the inflation indexes do not pick up additional health care costs that employers pass along to workers, it is likely that most workers’ wages are not even keeping pace with their cost of living.
The economy has lost more than 2.6 million jobs in the last two and a half years. Until it starts generating jobs again at a rapid pace, the situation will only get worse for most of the work force. Unfortunately, the bursting bubbles, like the collapse of the stock market, that led to the recent recession have counterparts still to come—the housing bubble is yet to burst. This means that, for working people, the times are likely to get worse before they get better. It appears, too, that those hardships will go unnoticed by the president, unacknowledged by investors, and underreported by the media.
ABOUT THIS AUTHOR
Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research and co-author of Social Security: The Phony Crisis (University of Chicago Press, 2000).

SAVE 53% OFF
Reader Comments
Mr. Baker’s article is right on the $$$. Bush’s economical policies are an dead-end. Unlike FDR, Mr. Bush only looks after his neo-con elk’s corporation profits. The American working calss is never on his agenda of economy policies. I billion $ spent on Iraq every week, why not use the money for US job creation? Why can the US govt develop new energy technologies that we don’t have to depden on middle East’s oil outputs? Bush has got to go, hey no to WAR! “Bring them out” said by Bush. I don’t see Bush’s children fighting in Iraq nor Hilly-Billy-burton VP—Dicky’s.
Posted by james yang on Aug 25, 2003 at 3:54 PM
But not unnoticed by voters.
Most people I know who were for Bush early on want the son-of-a-bitch out of office for this reason and, oh yeah, the illegal invasion of Iraq.
I hope we all speak against this and vote him out in 2004.
Posted by neil on Aug 26, 2003 at 1:41 AM
The bulk of the Bush tax cuts, skewed to the wrong income class, seems the only plan at hand this admn. has for addressing unemployment/job creation. China’s emergence as a base for low wage manufacturing will continue to steal jobs from here, as will corporate shifting of previous in-house work (accounting, IT etc.) overseas to India and other countries to reduce costs. Small businesses create the bulk of the new jobs, yet they are pressured as well by rising health insurance costs etc. and many times don’t pay as well as corporate or manufacturing jobs. Retaining jobs of these types is important and by relegating the bulk of the tax cut to the wealthy probably won’t help much, if at all. Few will expand employment on the basis of a tax cut as tax policy can change on a whim. Capital spending won’t rise meaningfully in the face of over-capacity or lack of demand. To be a consumption based economy relies on a stable job base and steady to rising incomes. Exporting jobs overseas will continue to pressure both and a tax cut won’t solve that, so some other ideas need to be examined and soon. Though most people will see some relief in varying degree due to the tax cuts, that is only true if you have a job, or are wealthy and don’t need a job.
Posted by e sorensen on Aug 26, 2003 at 9:37 AM
The people in power are so far removed from the real working class that it is impossible for them to understand our misery. Being a college graduate in an economic system which does not value education is very disconcerting, especially when I find it difficult to pay all of my bills. I feel that the system has failed me and many others who are forced to take low-paying jobs to survive. Not that I expect to live a lavish lifestyle, but it would help if services that we really need weren’t so unattainable, that those in power really were concerned with the well-being of all working citizens.
Posted by abel garcia on Aug 26, 2003 at 2:33 PM
Everyone despised Clinton but anyone could find a job.
Everyone loves Bush but no one can find a job.
WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE????
Posted by Tim Snyder on Aug 27, 2003 at 12:43 PM
extended discussion >>>Continued...
Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 16 posts.