Features > December 10, 2007

Hanging Hate

Backlash against the Jena Six case sparks an epidemic of public nooses

By David A Love

Protestors rally at Columbia University in New York on Oct. 10--a day after black professor Madonna Constantine discovered a hangman's noose on her office door.

The noose, that symbol of American racism associated with the Jim Crow South, is making a comeback.

Following the notorious Jena, La., incident, a rash of noose-related hate crimes has surfaced around the country, at times in the unlikeliest of places. These cases are not aberrations, but part of an endemic problem.

On Oct. 9, 2007, in New York City, a noose was found hanging from the office door of a black professor at Columbia University Teachers College. On Oct. 10, an NYPD officer found a noose hanging over his locker. On Oct. 11, a noose was found hanging from a light pole in front of a post office near Ground Zero. On Oct. 22, a noose was sent to a high school principal, a black woman, in Brooklyn.

For African Americans, the noose symbolizes racial intimidation, violence and death—and with good reason. “The noose is among the most repugnant of all racist symbols because it is itself an instrument of violence,” noted Judge Robert L. Carter, a black federal district judge, in Williams v. New York City Housing Authority. In this 2001 employment discrimination case, African-American public employees were subjected to a hostile work environment, including the hanging of a noose.

Lynching has been America’s own form of domestic terrorism, columnist George Curry wrote recently in the Philadelphia Inquirer: “Far from being merely a prank, the hanging of nooses harks back to a shameful period in American history. It was not until 1952 that the United States went a whole year without a single lynching.”

Mark Potok, a staff director at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate crimes and hate groups, thinks the current noose hangings are a reaction to Jena. “What the nooses represent is a wider and deeper backlash by whites than people recognize,” he says. “White people think the events in Jena were whitewashed by an evil and politically correct press.”

To track these hate crimes, DiversityInc magazine has initiated “Noose Watch,” which catalogues incidents of what it calls a “dangerous racist trend.” As of Dec. 5, it had collected information on 61 incidents that have occurred since the beginning of 2006. (The New York Times reports that 50 to 60 noose incidents have occurred since the large Sept. 20, 2007 rally in Jena) Most recently:

• On Nov. 20, a city employee in Slidell, La., was fired for allegedly hanging a noose at a job site a few days prior.
• On Nov. 13, a college student in Orangeburg, S.C., was arrested for hanging a noose in a classroom.
• On Nov. 8, in Beekman, La., high school students discovered a raccoon hanging from a noose on their school’s flagpole.
• On Oct. 30, a black mannequin with a noose tied around its neck was found in a county landfill building in Sacramento, Calif.
• On Oct. 24, a noose was placed around the neck of a bronze statue of Tupac Shakur in Atlanta.
• On Oct. 15, a housekeeper at Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh, Pa., found a noose hanging in a 10th floor hospital room.
• On Oct. 4, a black Verizon employee in Cranberry, Pa., found a doll with a noose tied around its neck, along with a note saying that she did not deserve her promotion.
• On Oct. 1, at a construction site in Philadelphia, Pa., a white construction worker held a noose in front of a black co-worker and allegedly said he “wanted to hang someone.”
• In October 2007, a noose was found hanging from the exit of a Home Depot store under construction in South Elgin, Ill., along with racist graffiti.
• On Sept. 28, a noose was found in the men’s bathroom of the Hempstead, Long Island, police department.
• On Sept. 20, two men were arrested in Alexandria, La., for having nooses in the back of their pickup truck, only hours after an anti-racism march in nearby Jena.

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, the number of hate groups in the United States shot up from 602 to 844 between 2000 and 2006—an increase of 40 percent. The group also found that, based on 2005 Department of Justice data, about 191,000 hate-crime incidents are reported each year. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is handling an increasing number of noose cases alone: 24 since 2001. The number of reported workplace racial harassment cases increased from 3,075 in 1991 to 6,000 in 2006.

“The display of nooses does occur anywhere,” says Lewis Steel, a civil rights attorney at Outten & Golden in New York City. “African Americans who are exposed to this are infuriated by it. It rubs a nerve, whereas with white people it is just not in their experience.”

Steel is representing black and Latino employees in a lawsuit against the New York City Parks Department for racial discrimination and practices—including multiple displays of nooses on city property. He says that combating these incidents in the employment context depends to a large extent on the leadership of the employer.

“Certainly when we originally started the Parks Department case, [former New York City Parks Commissioner Henry] Stern viewed the display of nooses as silly,” Steel says. “He did not send a memo around, and no action was really taken against those who displayed them.”

Similarly, Reed Walters, the district attorney of LaSalle Parish, La., who prosecuted the Jena Six black teens for a schoolyard brawl with a white classmate, reacted to the hanging of the nooses at Jena High School by telling black students they were making too much of the “prank.”

Many black Americans think government officials are treating these noose incidents too lightly.

On Nov. 3, hundreds of people marched in Charleston, W.V., in support of Megan Williams, a 20-year-old black woman whom authorities say was kidnapped, tortured, beaten and raped by six white men and women in a trailer over the course of a week. Williams’ captors also allegedly forced her to eat rat, dog and human feces, and placed a noose around her neck. The six suspects, who were arrested and charged with kidnapping, sexual assault, malicious wounding and battery, have not been charged with hate crimes.

“They just kept saying, ‘This is what we do to niggers down here,’” Williams told the Associated Press.

On Nov. 16, thousands of community activists, led by the Rev. Al Sharpton, marched at the U.S. Department of Justice demanding that the federal government more vigorously prosecute crimes of racial violence.

“When you hang up a noose, it’s no joke to us,” said Sharpton at the march. “Every noose that’s hung should be prosecuted by the law. And we’re going to demand that today.” According to Sharpton, the federal government has relinquished its responsibility to protect civil rights by relying on states to address hate crimes, something he characterized as a “revival of states’ rights.”

In response to the march, Attorney General Michael Mukasey issued this statement: “In recent months, there have been reports of nooses and other symbols of racial and religious hate appearing in schools, workplaces and neighborhoods across the country. These symbols of hate have no place in our great country. … Although there are limitations and challenges in bringing successful hate crimes prosecutions, the department takes each case seriously and is prepared to vindicate the rights of the victims when prosecution is warranted by the facts and by federal law.”

Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) has said that “for too long, the Department of Justice failed to confront the serious questions of injustice, inequality and intolerance raised by the troubling events in Jena.” She advocates restoring professionalism to the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, and calls for strengthening the hate crimes laws and voting laws.

In a letter to Mukasey, presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) wrote, “Unfortunately, this administration—and your predecessors as attorney general—have a poor track record in the area of investigating discrimination against racial minorities, while inexplicably focusing resources on a few, exceptional cases involving white victims.”

Meanwhile, Steel, who has used the legal system to wage the fight against noose-related hate crimes, thinks that community organizing is needed to get the attention of people in power and bring about change.

“There is a real connection between community organizing and leadership. This kind of conduct … is really despicable, so you hope the community should protest against this type of thing. It is hateful and it is stomach turning. You want to see communities organizing so this type of thing doesn’t happen again.”

But why are these racially motivated crimes on the rise at this point in time? Potok suggests that the recent noose incidents reflect not a fringe phenomenon, but a major social problem. “We’re looking at an upsurge in racial nationalism,” says Potok. “What’s going on is a serious backlash against globalization. You have a certain level of economic rage that provides fertile ground for these groups.” He says that with more people of color immigrating to the country, “whites are angry and uneasy.”

According to Potok, these whites who are scapegoating think, “Our country is being stolen from us. The country my white Christian forefathers built is being taken away.” But on Democracy Now!, Malik Shabazz, a member of Black Lawyers for Justice, said: “The hanging of nooses is a sign that there [could] be real bodies under those nooses very soon.”

• subscribe to print magazine

  First Name Last Name Home Address City State Zip Code Email

  2-year, 24-issues, $44.95 1-year, 12-issue, $24.95

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  “whites are angry and uneasy.”

  Yeah, those white people are dangerous! Especially when they are “angry and uneasy”!

  Or perhaps there are a small amount of crazies out there who really do hate (and they come in all colors!) and they make for lots of press. Some even wear white hoods over their heads (talk about crazy). Note that these people are very very far from the mainstream and that all races/creeds etc are represented (in fact, one easily might believe that blacks are over represented in this lamentable group).

  At least no one here names their teddy bears Mohummed.  :)

  Posted by wolf on Dec 10, 2007 at 10:54 AM

  Evidently “wolf” failed to read the article closely or else chooses to maintain the ‘crazy few’ theory despite the abundant evidence that racial hatred is growing by leaps and bounds in American society. 

  This ‘growth industry’ isn’t confined to only racist Whites (of which there are plenty) but is also evident in the ‘race wars’ in Los Angeles where Latinos are conducting ‘ethnic cleansing’ of Blacks from Latino neighborhoods… evidently on orders of ‘la eme’.

  Recent Supreme Court rulings, and those of lower courts, have reversed the Government’s stand against overt racism as long as it’s called something conveniently vague or Orwellian, and serve to increase the amount of segregation in our society and the degree of discrimination in access to goods & services.

  These same kinds of trends were evident in Germany in the 1930’s as were so-called ‘pranks’ (against Germany’s Jews back then) that are that bygone era’s equivalent of nooses found in workplaces and elsewhere.  And, as history showed us then, Malik Shabazz’s comments on DemocracyNow, are exactly right.

  Without a strong, concerted, resistance to the mainstreaming of hate, the next step - once conditions are ripe - will be bodies hanging from poles exactly as forecast in William Pierce’s racist apocalyptic “The Turner Diaries”.

  And, just as we heard from ‘surprised’ Germans in 1945, people like “wolf” will be heard to say “I never thought it would go that far"…

  Posted by Marshalldoc on Dec 10, 2007 at 7:11 PM

  “Lynching has been America’s own form of domestic terrorism, columnist George Curry wrote recently in the Philadelphia Inquirer: ‘Far from being merely a prank, the hanging of nooses harks back to a shameful period in American history. It was not until 1952 that the United States went a whole year without a single lynching.’”

  Actually this is a good point. To not recognize the emotional body-blow that is intended by using nooses as a “prank” (as though it’s all in good humor or something… how idiotic, Mr. Walters, you should be humiliated to have uttered such a thing!)…

  ...using them to threaten Af-Ams is to maintain the racially divisive blind spot that disables the most basic level of identification, and identification is the one single factor that erodes racist stupidity fastest and most directly.

  I wonder how many white Americans would regard a fake explosive vest as a “prank”, if they were used in similar fashion by, say, someone who took exception to the war. Maybe he could wear it into the local Starbuck’s and have a grand old time scaring the customers.

  The intent would be identical, to cause the marks to have that sick, horrible feeling of being targeted, to know that some nut-job wants to fuck with their heads in that deep, primal sort of way that terrorists specialize in.

  But of course none of the “pranksters” would really put a noose around a human neck, or strap themselves with explosives for-real. It’s just a prank. All in good fun, right Mr. Walters?

  Crazier, stupider, uglier, meaner. It’s like we’re in a contest to see just how low we can go.

  Posted by Kuya on Dec 10, 2007 at 8:10 PM

  Marshalldoc is exactly correct. When the US turns fascist and begins the systematic extermination of Jews, blacks, whites or whatever group it targets as ok to hate and kill, i would say “I never thought it would go that far”. But since this is not going to happen (obviously, duh), it simply means i was correct. :)

  Posted by wolf on Dec 11, 2007 at 9:41 AM

  Um, I think some truth needs to be brought to light.  Most of those noose incidents were faked.  Perpetrated by the ‘victims’ themselves. Just research each story and you will see that after everything was said and done, the ‘victim’ was the one who hung the noose. 

  There isn’t as much racism in America as you think.  Consider that there are over 250 million Americans: 
  How many reported incidents?
  How many actually perpetrated by a racist?

  Most of the racist I’ve met, were the people looking for racism. Case in point:
  A co-worker asked a second co-worker, upon seeing him in the shop welding, “I did not know you knew how to weld.” Response of second co-worker, “You think because I’m black I don’t know how to weld?”
  Who was the racist?

  My 2¢.

  Posted by mdren68 on Dec 14, 2007 at 10:54 AM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 10 posts.

Member Login

Also by David A Love

• Hanging Hate
  Backlash against the Jena Six case sparks an epidemic of public nooses