News > January 17, 2008

N.J. Closes Death Row

By Alice Kim

New Jersey Governor Jon S. Corzine speaks with the media before he signs legislation to eliminate the death penalty.

It’s official. Before 2007 came to a close, New Jersey became the first state in the United States in 40 years to abolish the death penalty.

With a stroke of a pen, Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine signed a law eliminating the state’s death sentence and replacing it with life without the possibility of parole. The measure was the culmination of a concerted statewide campaign.

In January 2007, a 13-member, appointed commission—including a police chief, a couple of prosecutors and a father who lost his daughter to a violent crime in 2000—recommended abolishing the death penalty. In addition to citing concerns about the risk of executing an innocent person, the commission found that the death penalty was a poor deterrent to crime, increasingly “inconsistent with evolving standards of decency,” and not worth the financial and emotional costs.

Activists took these findings to the streets, the legislature and the public. In early December, after heated floor debates the state Senate and Assembly both passed the measure.

“Nobody wants to execute the wrong person,” says Abe Bonowitz, field manager for New Jerseyans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty. “More importantly, the strength of murder victims’ families to be present and to share their tragedy was a way of helping legislators understand that the death penalty just creates more pain.”

Other states—including Maryland, New Mexico and South Dakota—are considering similar measures. In Illinois, a moratorium on executions has remained in place since 2000, when former Republican Gov. George Ryan halted executions in light of the revelation of wrongful convictions in the state and around the country.

Nationally, no executions have taken place since Sept. 25, 2007, when the state of Texas executed Michael Richard hours after the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to examine the constitutionality of lethal injection. Since then, a de facto moratorium on executions is pending a Supreme Court ruling on whether lethal injection violates the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

Public confidence in the death penalty has eroded over the last decade, according to a June 2007 poll released by the Death Penalty Information Center. The poll, conducted by RT Strategies, found that 40 percent of Americans believe that they would be disqualified from serving on a jury in a death penalty case because of their moral beliefs. Moreover, 58 percent think executions should be halted temporarily while procedures are looked at more closely. The poll also found that a whopping 87 percent of people believe that an innocent prisoner was executed in recent years, and nearly 70 percent think that the wrongful execution of an innocent person is inevitable with capital punishment.

The findings of another study, conducted by Mark Peffley and Jon Hurwitz, recently published in the American Journal of Political Science, found that race matters when it comes to public opinion on the death penalty.

When a random set of white people were asked, “Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder?” 36 percent said that they strongly favored the death penalty. Another random set of white people was asked the same question, but with a slight variation: “Some people say that the death penalty is unfair because most of the people who are executed are African Americans. Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder?” In response to this question, 52 percent said that they strongly favored the death penalty, an increase of 16 percent.

To explore this disparity, Peffley and Hurwitz took a closer look at what whites and blacks believe causes crime. They found that whites were more likely to believe that personal failings were the primary cause of crime rather than social factors, such as poverty and inequality.

Yet, as African Americans continue to be sentenced to death disproportionately—comprising nearly 42 percent of the U.S. death row population—the New Jersey victory should be seen as a blow to racism in America. Additionally, since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, 80 percent of people executed have been executed for murders involving white victims, according to a 2003 Amnesty International report.

Meanwhile, in the race for the White House, talk about the death penalty is rare among the candidates. The top three contenders for the Democratic nomination—Sen. Hillary Clinton (N.Y.), Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) and former Sen. John Edwards—all support the death penalty.

Indeed, even though Obama sponsored death penalty reform legislation during his tenure as state senator in Illinois, he supports capital punishment in cases “so heinous that the community is justified in expressing the full measure of its outrage by meting out the ultimate punishment,” according to his bestselling autobiography, The Audacity of Hope.

Of the Democratic candidates, only Rep. Dennis Kucinich (Ohio) and former Sen. Mike Gravel oppose the death penalty.

But as states like New Jersey and Illinois show, it doesn’t have to be presidential contenders who lead the nation away from capital punishment.

• subscribe to print magazine

  First Name Last Name Home Address City State Zip Code Email

  2-year, 24-issues, $44.95 1-year, 12-issue, $24.95

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about. Check out a sample.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Good.

  I don’t agree with the death penalty because I don’t want the community, via the law, to have the power to kill an individual. Some things should not be subject to a referendum, for the simple reason that passionately held feelings, even (especially) by “the majority”, can lead to terrible outcomes. And too many erroneous convictions have taken place for me ever to have confidence in capital punishment; you can let a guy out of a cell if he’s been put there wrongly, you can’t let him out of the grave.

  For those who really do carry out heinous crimes against innocents, I advocate that they remain behind bars. I mean, remain. Maybe they’ll reflect on their crime and come to some sort of epiphany, or maybe they won’t. Either way, he’ll be out of the neighborhood. Some useful task or other can be given to them. Or they can read books for 80 years. Something.

  For those who would appeal to my rage if a loved one were to be murdered, especially with aggravating circumstances like a rape, it may be that I couldn’t live with the terrible feelings, but those feelings should not be the basis of law. Yes, I know it’s easy to say that from in front of a keyboard and monitor. I’d either have to get over it (maybe impossible, knowing myself as I do) or go after the guy and then take my comeuppance if I went hunting and took him out. There’s where my stated values would get the real test. I can’t say I know what I’d do in that circumstance, but in any case I’m glad NJ has ended the death penalty.

  Posted by Kuya on Jan 18, 2008 at 1:33 AM

  Amen, Brother.  We as a society should join the world community in abolishing the type of ancient revenge mentality that attempts to justify capital punishment and focus all our efforts and resources, instead, on ensuring that our children are raised in an atmosphere of trust, love, and tolerance that would never allow them to kill one another for any reason.  There is no justification for killing.

  Posted by CarolynMerritt on Jan 23, 2008 at 10:13 AM

  CarolynMerrit, I fully agree with your position. Killing is never a solution to anything and there is plenty to be done in the way children are submitted to patterns of violence, greed and ruthless competition instead of teaching them the value of nature, love and compassion.
  Good for New Jersey.

  Posted by Maria on Jan 25, 2008 at 12:49 PM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Member Login

Also by Alice Kim

• N.J. Closes Death Row
  

Your financial support of In These Times is critical, because as Thomas Jefferson said, "Information is the currency of democracy." And information doesn't come cheap.

Donate now and get a Kurt Vonnegut mug or t-shirt!