Help In These Times raise $5,000 in two weeks! Donate now!
PrintDiscuss
News » November 11, 2003

Still Watching

Private industry moves in to compile personal data

By Dave Lindorff

Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller
Coming soon to a law enforcement department near you: The Matrix, Loaded.

Not the movie—something far more disturbing: the Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange.

In reaction to public outrage, Congress cancelled funding for retired Adm. John Poindexter’s so-called Total Information Awareness (TIA) project at the Pentagon—even though the “T” was later changed to the more acceptable “Terrorism.” But it turns out that a group of 13 states, spearheaded by Florida, have been working with a private company to develop a similar system designed to put everyone’s records at police fingertips.

Matrix—developed with a $12 million federal grant—was designed by Seisint Inc., which previously used its data-mining software to help insurance companies detect fraud.

For the last year and a half, Florida’s state police have been using Seisint’s system to search information at the touch of a keypad: drivers licenses, car registrations, criminal records, child abuse records and corrections records—as well as “publicly available” financial records. Another dozen states, including Georgia, New York and Pennsylvania, will buy into the system, giving police access to all of the other members’ records. Several states, including Texas and California, declined to participate, citing concerns about the security of the data being collected and accessed.

The ACLU, alarmed at what it sees as a state end run around congressional de-funding of Poindexter’s project, filed freedom of information requests October 30 for details of Matrix with all participating states

“This is a very scary development,” says Barry Steinhardt, director of the ACLU’s Technology and Liberty Program. “This Matrix system means you can search information on hundreds of millions of people. Law-abiding Americans are going to pay the price for letting law enforcement troll all their data this way.”

Like TIA, Matrix backers say the system is simply another tool in the battle against terror. But it will play little part in that effort, which is largely a federal government job. Rather, Matrix will be used in run-of-the-mill law enforcement.

“I won’t lie to you,” says Lt. Col. Ralph Periandi, deputy commissioner for operations with the Pennsylvania State Police. “This system is not just being used to investigate terrorism.”

Concerns about possible misuse of data were aroused when it was discovered that the designer of the system, Hank Asher, was an unindicted co-conspirator in a $150-million cocaine smuggling ring. Asher resigned from the Seisint board last August.

Periandi serves as a member of the policy board developing Matrix and says with Asher gone there are no problems. “All of the Seisint people who will have access to the data will be vetted,” Periandi says. The system also will include tight controls over access, he continues, and a clear audit trail to follow in case of misuse.

But what about concerns that the system could lead to a world in which police monitor everyone? In response, Periandi laughs: “I guess it comes down to whether you trust the police or not.”

Given the record of police spying and misuse of intelligence data over the recent decades, most recently in Denver and Philadelphia, such a remark is not encouraging. Nor are reports that the Matrix consortium is considering giving access to the data to the CIA, which ordinarily is not supposed to spy on Americans within the United States.

Periandi argues that Matrix doesn’t give police new powers or access to additional data. “We can access all this information already,” he says. The difference: Getting it today requires making separate searches through individual databases in each of the 50 states. “With Matrix we can do it in 10 minutes,” he says.

But the ACLU’s Steinhardt replies that this is just the problem. “Before, investigators had to have a reason to track the information on one suspect,” he says. “Now they can do data-mining and search for associations among all citizens, based upon certain assumptions.”

Periandi provided a perfect example of such assumptions by suggesting that searches could examine how “serial killers tend to use all three of their names, like John Wilkes Booth.” But he disavows the term “data-mining.” Although it is widely used in modern industry, he says, police authorities prefer the term “database integration.”

“I think you’ll find that with a project as Orwellian as this, these government agencies will engage in the Orwellian practice of trying to rename things,” says Steinhardt. “But whatever you call it, it means the police using Matrix will be able to monitor the activities of all the citizens in their states—and that’s frightening.”
  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Dave Lindorff, an In These Times contributing editor, is the author of This Can't Be Happening: Resisting the Disintegration of American Democracy. His work can be found at This Can't Be Happening.

More information about Dave Lindorff
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    But what about concerns that the system could lead to a world in which police monitor everyone? In response, Periandi laughs: ìI guess it comes down to whether you trust the police or not.î

    In my life I’ve known about 8 police officers personally.  Every single one of them were corrupt in some fashion.  The corruption ran the gamut from not reporting 2nd job income to wife beating to shaking down suspects for money or property.  One detective I knew in Fort Worth, TX bragged often about beating “niggers” with a rubber hose.  Over the years I have come to view all police officers as scum that is not to be trusted.  Who in their right mind would trust a paramilitary organization with this sort of information gathering & power?  It would not surprise me if they started taking a closer look at people subscribing or reading In These Times.  Should I become paranoid & cancel my subscription?  HELL NO!  We must go back to the days when the police were public servants charged with protecting the rights of American citizens.  No law abiding American should feel awe & fear when a police officer approaches them.
    Boyd Teague
    Lincolnton,  NC

    Posted by Boyd Teague on Nov 12, 2003 at 9:13 PM

    Being a Floridian I am very aware of Matrix and though there is alot of truth to what is being said about Matrix, I believe Sept. 11th changed everything…yes privacy is an issue, and yes it is Orwellian, but
    the informatiom in Matrix is derived from public records, which is available to Law Enforcement presently. Matrix returns 2 weeks of reseach in 2 minutes and if it can save a childs life after they are abducted or save just 1 Americans life, then I say so be it. These are changing times, I’ll ask you 1 question…If Matrix was able to save the life of one of your loved ones…what would you do?

    Posted by Joseph Selma on Nov 12, 2003 at 10:38 PM

    The potential benefits of this program are far oughtweighted and overchadowed by the potential fo misuse. anyone else for moving to another country within the next few years? you know… while we still can.

    Posted by Jon BBartholomew on Nov 13, 2003 at 12:25 AM

    When are we the people going to put an end to allowing our government to abuse our taxdollars to completely imprison us in this fascist-corporatist anti-democracy that once bragged about being an open society?  Doesn’t anyone get it?  It’s the watchers who need watching, stupid!  Let’s see secret tapes of them aired on national television so WE can judge whether or not THEY are doing their job and not just gathering concocted trumped-up evidence against innocent people who disagree with their Orwellian-Huxlean-Machiavellian world view.  After all, they are beholden to US for granting them the trust for the job they’re supposed to do.  Why aren’t they aiming their lenses at their bosses?  That’s where the REALLY monstrous crimes are being hatched up, after all.  Then, let’s not forget that their bosses work for US too so they should be held to an even higher standard.  Tapes of their lives, 24/7 must be made a standard for citizens’ assurance that our tax dollars are being spent as we wish them to be.  I am personally sick and tired of our own abrogation of our civil rights as a consequence of being brainwashed by all the cop and prosecutor, FBI, CIA, et alia which leave us believing the presumption that these sleazebag goon bastards are beyond reproach.  What, has everyone forgotten the last forty years of continuous real-life revelations of the the abuses of power?  Cointelpro, MK Ultra, Iran-Contra, Watergate, this gate and that gate.  Ollie North the confessed liar now a thriving TV good-guy.  Poindexter the convict trying to spend our money to spy on all of us.  When will we wake up?  I say that until an equal amount of our money and trust is spent on making certain alleged criminals are the right suspects…those who accuse them must be suspects themselves.  I have as much faith in our judicial system as I do in the fairy tale about Jack and the Beanstalk…none!  And they want to keep an eye out on US…at OUR expense?  I say: not until we get daily rushes on all the media displaying the private lives of those who would place themselves above the law!

    Posted by Dominick on Nov 13, 2003 at 7:03 AM

    For those who still think that 9/11 is still a viable excuse for whatever the bastards who made we the people into criminals do…Let me remind you that this regime is stonewalling the 9/11 investigation.  Let me remind you again that those who were blamed were blamed on a presumption that was never proved.  The entire sordid march of events which have used 9/11 as the sacred cow excuse for every and all atrocities and infringements on our Constitutional Rights is built upon the say-so of those who are being found out to be the greatest liars since the Third Reich.  Why would an administration that uses 9/11 as the excuse for all it wants to do NOT want to assist in it’s investigation.  After all, if their accusations were correct, if they themselves were not complicit…all they’d have to do to quickly put everyone like me, who suspects their complicity, at ease is DIVULGE the evidence and documentation that led them to accuse whomever they did.  Why does the 9/11commission have to resort to subpoenas if they are innocent of any wrongdoing?  National Security?  Bullshit!  Where was national security on 9/11?  Besides, we have the RIGHT TO KNOW because WE are the ones effected by the wars, we are the ones who must endure while they spout their lies from safe enclaves in kevlar suits.  If they were innocent they would hand over the evidence requested of them with alacrity because it would prove their innocence.  So, don’t keep referring to the 9/11 mantra to excuse these corrupt and murderous liars and hypocrites.  They are all of them just Rush Limbaugh clones who do the nasty stuff instead of just talk about it.  Get this through your heads, folks…these dragons in silk suits will stop at nothing to insure that they retain their power.  This article is just exposing another application of their principle:  Any atrocity or lie is justifiable in order to maintain dominance and keep the citizenry down.  Fear and intimidation, injustice and abuse of power are the tools of their trade.  If they want war and the blood money they make from it…let them and their children go fight it.  Let’s make them pass a law that only those who stand to amass obscene wealth from war go fight it themselves.  What do you think, will they go for that?  Why not, it’s only just and fair.  Enough of this blaming of alleged terrorists from strange countries.  The worst terrorists run THIS country.

    Posted by Dominick on Nov 13, 2003 at 7:28 AM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 11 posts.

Appeared in the December 8, 2003 Issue
Also by Dave Lindorff
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS