Help In These Times raise $10,000 in three weeks! Donate now!
Help this website survive! Donate to In These Times now!
PrintDiscuss
Views » May 2, 2008 » Web Only

The Plague of Potomac Fever

By David Sirota

Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller

If any publication was going to document the sickness known as Potomac Fever, it was going to be the Washington Post.

Last month, the newspaper penned a front-page dispatch headlined “Housing Accord Puts Builders First; Strapped Homeowners Offered Little Aid.” It described congressional leaders agreeing to “provide billions of dollars in tax rebates to the slumping home-building industry while offering little to homeowners threatened with foreclosure.” The bill proposes $6 billion in corporate tax cuts, while “families who cannot afford to repay their home loans — the group at the heart of the mortgage meltdown” would get less than 2 percent of that for “counseling services.”

Next to this story was a report labeled “Sweeping Bills Passed to Help Homeowners.” It told of Maryland state lawmakers “toughening oversight of the mortgage-lending industry and establishing preemptive measures to help people at risk of foreclosure.”

The newspaper page was a scientific proof, with states as the control. They show what minimally healthy democratic systems do: help ordinary people. That’s different from a Congress ravaged by Potomac Fever — the disease inside the Washington Beltway inhibiting emotions like compassion and integrity. As the housing crisis intensifies, this malady is getting worse.

For example, states like Oregon are cracking down on predatory lenders, while North Carolina and Minnesota are the latest to regulate abusive mortgage fees. Yet, Congress — debilitated by the fever — does nothing to halt banks’ usurious practices that originally created the mortgage meltdown.

State legislators are demanding aid to borrowers. Delegate Dereck Davis (D-Md.) told the Washington Post that homeowners “need a federal bailout from Congress.”

But in the land of Potomac Fever, bailouts are for financial firms. Congressman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) in fact, told newspapers “it’s irrelevant” how many homeowners — if any — are ever helped. According to The Hill newspaper, he is pushing industry-backed legislation that would federally guarantee banks’ outstanding mortgages for modest write-downs. The proposal deliberately avoids forcing banks to freeze interest rates.

Because the plan is voluntary, lenders “will just dump their worst loans into the system,” says economist Dean Baker. The Congressional Budget Office adds that the proposal focuses not on rescuing homeowners, but on “shift[ing] the risk involved in mortgage losses from the current lenders and investors to taxpayers.”

Such virulent strains of Potomac Fever have many causes. One is the proximity of lawmakers to constituents. Many state representatives serve part time and are not career politicians, meaning they have authentic connections to local communities and therefore often better reflect public priorities. By contrast, professional lawmakers in Washington are insulated from real-world pressures by six-figure salaries, security sentries and servile staffers.

Campaign contributions are also a culprit. Though industries certainly influence state legislators, Big Money has a tougher time controlling 50 separate state capitals than one U.S. Capitol. And, boy, is the money flowing in D.C. Reporting on the housing crisis, Politico.com says “campaign donations from affected industries have spiked [and] lobbyists also are making money off the misery.” Banks pleading poverty somehow have plenty of resources to buy influence.

Finally, there is the filibuster — a tool that does not exist in state legislatures. Coupled with the U.S. Senate’s undemocratic structure giving Delaware as many votes as California, the filibuster allows 41 politicians representing just 11 percent of America’s total population to stop almost anything. Corporate lobbyists and their Senate allies have used the filibuster to obstruct legislation representing the public’s economic interests.

Can Potomac Fever be stopped? Maybe not, considering most inside the Beltway are so afflicted they have lost the capacity to even see it. Then again, the more bold actions states take, the more ill Washington will look. Perhaps the embarrassing contrast can cure the plague.

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
David Sirota is a senior editor at In These Times and author of the bestselling books The Uprising and Hostile Takeover. He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com.

More information about David Sirota
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Come on, it is simply NOT POSSIBLE to embarrass a legislator into doing anything.

    While the rest of us are feeling the loss of jobs and job quality, the rampant inflation in food and energy (not part of the core they love to quote), increasing health care and education costs, they are getting automatic pay raises.

    The whole Fed mortgage charade is designed to protect those responsible for the biggest economic fraud in history.

    The legislative pattern for home foreclosure is the same one which gave us:
    • Homeland Security which searches grandma
    • allows illegal immigrants to flow across our borders
    • increasing visas for foreign high-end job applicants with no follow up at expiration
    • no inspection on 99% of imported food products

    When money talks, Washington listens. Just try to communicate with your own representative… the response has already been printed and waiting for your comments which, “are important” to them.

    If not for the price of petroleum and chickens, we should tar and feather the whole bunch.

    Posted by whattheheck on May 3, 2008 at 4:39 PM

    Nail’em up I say.

    Posted by GrendelSon on May 7, 2008 at 7:49 AM

    “If not for the price of petroleum and chickens, we should tar and feather the whole bunch.”

    “Nail’em up I say.”

    Excellent suggestions but you might also consider stoning them.
    Rocks are plentiful and free and environmentally friendly too.

    Posted by Jiminy Cricket on May 9, 2008 at 4:46 AM
  • register a new account »Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.
Also by David Sirota
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS
Help this website survive! Donate to In These Times now!