News » November 19, 2003

Scandalous Measures

States might lose controls on corporate crooks

By A.C. Thompson and James A. Thompson

The Bush administration is quietly seeking to roll back oversight of the banking business and the scandal-riddled securities market through two pending proposals—a planned rule change for the banking industry and a house bill—that diminish the ability of states to police banks and stock brokers.

The plans are worrisome because the federal government has been largely MIA when it comes to cracking down on corporate crooks in the post-Enron era. While the feds have grabbed headlines with a few high-profile indictments, state law enforcers—most notably New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer—are taking a far more active role in purging Wall Street of con artists and thieves.

Formulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the shakeup would nullify state banking laws stricter than federal regulations. Headed by John D. Hawke, Jr., a K-Street player who’s worked for Democrats and Republicans, the OCC is a little-known regulatory backwater but it wields a vast amount of power over the nation’s financial institutions.

According to a notice in the Federal Register the new rules could wipe out state civil and criminal statutes covering lending, deposit-taking, credit cards, checking accounts, escrow accounts and “all [other] powers authorized” by federal law.

In early October, officials from numerous states issued a stream of scathing critiques of the proposed rule changes.

“This sweeping proposal would preempt virtually all state banking laws for national banks and their operating subsidiaries, essentially undermining the integrity of the recognized dual banking system,” wrote Thomas Curry, Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks, in a letter to the OCC.

The plan, Curry noted, would keep states from licensing or investigating local subsidiaries of national banks or from monitoring “finance companies, securities firms, mortgage lenders and brokers and collection agencies.” He says Massachusetts has secured $5.8 million in restitution for ripped-off consumers during the past two years.

State stock market cops fear the new regulations will curtail their work. “We think it could shield securities firms owned by banks from state regulation,” said Bob Webster, a spokesman for the Washington, D.C.-based North American Securities Administrators Association, which represents state securities regulators.

Webster and company are calling for more public input into the rulemaking process—an echo of the recent battle over media ownership at the Federal Communications Commission.

“Given the whole climate of corporate scandal, we think it’s time to strengthen, not weaken, investor protections,” he said. “We’re the early warning system. Investors naturally turn to their state officials for help before they call on Washington.”

The ongoing probe of possible fraud in the mutual fund market, Webster pointed out, originated with New York Attorney General Spitzer. Spitzer also orchestrated a “global settlement” between a dozen states and 10 prominent investment banks accused of feeding bogus information to mom-and-pop investors. In April, the banks paid $1.4 billion—a new record—and agreed to a host of reforms to make the case go away.

On the West Coast, California Corporations Commissioner Demetrios Boutris—who recently won a $6.5 million judgment against deceptive stock peddlers—also is annoyed by the OCC plan. In a previously unpublished October 6 letter obtained by In These Times, the commissioner challenged the proposal, saying the OCC “lacks the necessary Congressional authority” to overrule certain state laws.

At the OCC, spokesman Kevin Mukri played down the controversy. He portrays the whole effort as a simple attempt to untangle a mess of overlapping and contradictory state and federal statues.

“Our banks operate in 50 states and you have 50 states passing consumer protection laws, some very stringent, some not,” Mukri told In These Times. “This creates a uniform field. … It’s kind of like a housecleaning rule.”

Asked about criticisms leveled by the states, he replied, “they’re entitled to their opinions,” and pointed out that the proposal is backed by banking industry trade groups.

Mukri said his office has received more than 1,000 comments on the issue but has set no timeline for putting the rules into place.

The banking proposal looks suspiciously like another Bush administration scheme: HR 2179, a House bill introduced this session by Rep. Richard Baker (R-La.) and supported by Rep. Michael Oxley, (R-Ohio), Bush’s point man on corporate crime. The pending legislation is supposed to beef up the anemic and long-under-funded Securities Exchange Commission. But it, too, would curb the power of states to combat stock market scams.

HR 2179, which is currently idling but could be revived, has drawn howls from state authorities and consumer advocates, with Spitzer labeling it “an absolute, outright betrayal of the small investor.”

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  The coup de etat’ advances and we remain entranced by the “bread and circuses” tenor of news and views. Even on the minimal “left,” we are so focused on specific issues, that secret agendas are passed every day that are leading to what one Shell Oil scientist (ret) Claude Ake has called, “the militarization of commerce and the privaization of government.”  Lord, how the U.S. of Amnesia needs a wake up call. In Brazil, many cars now sport bumper stickers that say: “Veja! Que Mentira” (Look! What a Lie!).  This needs to be blazoned across the sky all day long, in Amerikka.

  Namaste

  daigu

  Posted by ryokan on Nov 20, 2003 at 8:53 AM

  ““Our banks operate in 50 states and you have 50 states passing consumer protection laws” Boo-Hoo!! If you don’t like the laws that the people of a given state have passed, don’t do business there!! In fact what these bastards want is no laws, unless of course they are custom written by them.

  Posted by Michael Harvey on Nov 21, 2003 at 2:08 PM

  I agree with Mike Harvey, but would like to add that the Bush admin doesn’t need laws, they just issue executive orders.

  Posted by thewhitezooloo on Nov 21, 2003 at 9:37 PM

  The ‘thief-in-chief’ has decieved many and most stunningly, those who call themselves ‘born again’ Christians.

  This is the most un-Christian, and truly evil administration the world has ever seen.  Beyond rhetorical lip service, there is nothing remotely Christian about this administration.  Indeed, it’s policies and actions appear more and more, to mirror those of Nazi Germany.

  Posted by Friend of Jesus on Nov 29, 2003 at 3:56 AM

  I do not understand why the bush administration has not handed over all the evidents involving 911 ..this delay is and unto its self evidents that something is very wrong here

  Posted by sandybb on Nov 29, 2003 at 4:04 AM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 12 posts.

Also featured Bolivia Offers Cautionary Tale for FTAA Negotiators
Vicious Circle
The Candidates on Health Care

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!