Features » June 23, 2008
Canaries in the Uranium Mine
Navajos gear up for renewed legal battle to protect their life and land
By Kari Lydersen
Larry J. King was one of thousands of Navajo who worked in the uranium mines with little safety equipment. Now companies again want to mine uranium near his ranch.
Nez shows visitors large color photos of lambs born abnormally -- bright pink and hairless, with yellow eyes. Many of them die soon after birth. He attributes this to uranium in the drinking water.
Teddy Nez, a Navajo rancher and Vietnam War veteran, lives practically in the shadow of a 40-foot-high pile of radioactive waste abutting his small home outside of Gallup, N.M. Nez has colon cancer, which he treats with herbs — but not with ones growing near his house, because those could be contaminated with uranium.
Thousands of Navajo have developed lung cancer, kidney disease and other serious illnesses linked to uranium mining — which has supplied the U.S. government with material for nuclear weapons and power plants from the 1940s through the ’80s. (Agencies such as the World Health Organization have documented the severe health effects of uranium exposure.)
Uranium mining in the United States came to a near halt in the early ’90s because of low uranium prices, related largely to the cooling of the arms race and public disillusionment with nuclear power. But now, thanks to skyrocketing oil prices and renewed interest in nuclear energy, companies are once again planning to mine uranium in and around Navajo land.
Jeff Spitz, a Chicago filmmaker who in the late ’90s shot Return of Navajo Boy — a documentary that followed a family affected by uranium — says Navajo families at the time thought they would have to deal with only the legacy of uranium.
“No one was interested [then] except the people suffering from uranium’s effects,” says Spitz, who is working on an epilogue to the film. “After traveling down this path already, I feel like it’s about to start all over again.”
‘100 percent undrinkable’
The first U.S. uranium boom started in the ’40s before the government acknowledged that the metal posed serious health risks. It was another 20 years before the dangers were officially accepted and publicized, and it took decades more for many Navajos to get the message. Not understanding the risks, Navajo families built their homes out of uranium-tainted rocks and the crushed remains of uranium ore. Children played amid the waste.
While there was little or no opposition to the first wave of uranium mining on Navajo land, the tribe and other uranium-mining opponents are now using legal and community action to protect themselves.
The New Mexico Environmental Law Center is appealing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s 1998 decision to allow the company Hydro Resources Inc. (HRI) to leach uranium from aquifers that supply water to the Navajo towns of Crownpoint and Church Rock in western New Mexico.
Instead of taking the uranium-laced ore from the ground, HRI is hoping to use a process — called in situ recovery (ISR) or in situ leaching (ISL) — that involves injecting oxygenated water into uranium-laden aquifers to bond with the uranium and allow it to be pumped out. Although it is less disruptive and waste-producing than traditional mining, critics say it could easily contaminate the water supply because it destabilizes uranium in the aquifer.
“Fifteen thousand people depend on that water supply for their domestic and agricultural needs,” says Eric Jantz, the lead attorney in the appeal. “There is a 100 percent chance it will be undrinkable afterwards.”
Randy Foote, New Mexico operations director for Texas-based Uranium Resources Inc., Hydro Resources’ parent company, asserts that the aquifers will be cleansed with reverse osmosis treatments, returning the water to its pre-mining condition. Jantz doesn’t buy it.
“With in situ mining, the aquifer is intentionally polluted, and they can never get all the uranium out,” he says. “There has never been a successful restoration of an ISL aquifer. That aquifer becomes a sacrifice.”
Jantz’s appeal also argues that the amount Hydro Resources plans to set aside for restoration is too low. The company proposed a $9 million restoration fund for one section of the project. It would have to put down only a third of that up front. But an expert contracted by the New Mexico Environmental Law Center says it could take close to $24 million to adequately restore that site.
“One of two things would happen,” says Jantz. “Either taxpayers would be stuck with the bill. Or, the more likely scenario is it just wouldn’t get cleaned up.”
In 2005, the Navajo Nation banned uranium mining and milling on its land, and in 2006, an Indigenous World Uranium Summit was held at the Navajo capital of Window Rock, about 150 miles east of Flagstaff, Ariz.
Uranium Resources and other companies seeking to do business in New Mexico stress they are looking only at private land. But the area they want to mine has a complex patchwork of subsurface mineral and water rights that underlie an already complicated checkerboard of tribal and non-tribal land. Tribal leaders argue their ban should prevent these proposed operations.
The U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals is currently deciding whether the Crownpoint and Church Rock sites — where Uranium Resources wants to conduct in situ mining — is tribal land.
More information about Kari Lydersen
-
subscribe to print magazine
-
email this article to a friend
-
Reader Comments
-
register a new account »Posting Security
Appeared in the july 2008 Issue
Also featured
Death Squads in Oaxaca
Freedom of the Press Moguls
Dismantling the Myth of McCain
Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!
Also by Kari Lydersen
- The Legacy Lives On
The Republic Windows and Doors factory occupation in Chicago inspired a similar revolt halfway across the country.Posted on June 28, 2009 - Coal Mountain Elementary
Big Coal has worked its way into the classroom.Posted on June 4, 2009 - Global Warming Accelerates
As sea levels rise faster than expected, political and social catastrophes loom.Posted on April 1, 2009 - In Mexico, Resistance is Futile
John Gibler chronicles a country embattled, but not conquered.Posted on February 12, 2009 - No Choice for Immigrants
Catholic Bishops and HHS trample reproductive rights of teens in federal custody Posted on December 29, 2008
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
RSS Feed