Help In These Times raise $5,000 in two weeks! Donate now!
PrintDiscuss
Features » August 27, 2008 » Web Only

Was Hillary’s speech a turning point?

Many Clinton supporters in Denver swallow doubts, support Obama

By Jacob Wheeler

Lauren Fort Miller, a former mayor of Sag Harbor, New York, thinks Hilllary is a better listener than Obama. Nevertheless, she'll support the Democratic nominee.

Tags   
Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller

DENVER — Just about everyone inside the Pepsi Center last night for Day Two of the Democratic National Convention had reason to smile. Hillary Clinton supporters saw their hero at her best: graceful and conciliatory, yet visionary and wise. Gone was the feisty (some would argue, condescending) tone that accompanied the senator from New York whenever she raised her voice against Barack Obama during their primary battle.

Obama supporters breathed a sigh of relief when early in her speech, Hillary left no doubt that she was behind Barack in his bid for the White House.

“I’m a proud mother, a proud senator from New York, a proud Democrat … and a proud supporter of Barack Obama!” she said, to thunderous approval, after waiting through three minutes of applause before she could begin her speech.

Democratic Party faithful clenched their fists in gleeful, testosterone-driven rage when Hillary attacked Republican presidential candidate John McCain with witty (for a politician) jabs: “No way, no how, no McCain” and “How fitting that Bush and McCain will be together in the Twin Cities next week, because these days it’s hard to tell the two apart.” Hillary on the offensive meant that the party could once again count on the Clintons — their best attack dogs against Republicans in decades.

Even His Highness, William Jefferson Clinton — left out of Hillary’s introductory words (she never said “proud wife”) and treated as a liability through much of her primary campaign — was reported to chuckle and tear up a bit during poignant moments of the speech. At other times, Bill sat back in his chair, appearing to lip sync entire lines. If he helped Hillary practice her speech, Bill must not have been completely banished from the camp.

These political conventions are all about symbolism, and so it was no mistake that vertical blue banners on sticks (distributed among the delegates during the speech) sported the word “Unity” on one side and either “Obama” or “Hillary” on the other. The family reunion turned out to be a success, with more handshakes and hugs than bitching and shoving.

Leave that to the media — those hordes toiling throughout Denver with backs made crooked by laptop bags, gobbling up free stuff around every corner. The media are always looking for dissent within the ranks: the crux of another story.

This week they found it in the supposed intra-party Obama-Clinton chasm. Hillary and Bill, and Chelsea, too, are pissed, we’re told. Obama and staff are arrogant and ungrateful for not considering Hillary as a vice presidential candidate. Hillary’s supporters, especially the phantom group PUMA (Party Unity My Ass — The Nation’s Katha Pollitt wonders if they have been McCain supporters all along, are considering throwing rotten vegetables on stage at Obama and voting for the old man from Arizona in November. And rising above it all (though not quite like a phoenix from the ashes, for that would suggest grace) is John McCain, whose campaign advertisement last week sought to manipulate this rift.

Is it actually possible that these empowered, emotional, angry-as-hell-at-Bush-and-Cheney Hillary lovers would vote against the upstart young black man, and in favor of the neo-cons and tax breaks for the rich this fall? Is their party truly tearing itself apart?

I’m not getting that impression in Denver this week.

Sure, there are exceptions. Bob Kunst, a self-proclaimed single-issue Florida Zionist, stood near the state capitol building on Tuesday yelling at anyone who would listen that Obama is anti-Semitic. His alleged willingness to consider a Jewish-Arab border in Jerusalem would spell the end for the chosen people, according to Kunst.

Kunst digs Hillary. He thinks the people behind Obama dig Hamas, and so he’ll vote for Hamas’ self-proclaimed worst enemy, John McCain. Kunst added that Bush and Condi Rice are gambling with Israel too, and that Obama would represent a third-Bush term. But that ain’t chutzpah, that’s ridiculous.

Lauren Fort Miller, a former mayor of Sag Harbor on Long Island, represented a more typical sample of Hillary supporters. She and a friend stood on a street corner in downtown Denver with Hillary signs aloft, slowing down traffic and drawing attention aplenty.

“I think Hillary is definitely the most qualified person,” said Fort Miller. “How fitting that she’s the first woman to reach this level. I admire her because I’ve dealt with her personally, on a community level in which she really listened to people. That’s such an incredible challenge for a person. Mostly they want to talk. Obama is a talker. Hillary is a listener.”

How does Fort Miller feel about Hillary asking her to vote for Obama?

“She has to do that. What else is she gonna do? I’ll vote Democratic because I’m born to do that. But I have severe doubts about Obama, what he’s going to do and where he’s going to take us. He lacks experience. Hillary knows everybody and everything… She’s been studying and learning for this job her entire life. And where did he come from? He hasn’t even done the job [in the Senate] he was elected to do.”

Tammy Tesky, a delegate from Minneapolis who sported two pins on her shirt at the convention last night — one that read “Hillary Supporter” and another that read “Minnesota Delegate for Obama” — echoed some of Fort Miller’s fears, but is ready to support Obama.

“I’m a supporter of Hillary, and I will cast my vote for her at the convention. It’s been an historic campaign and we want to honor that with a vote. But as soon as I go home I’ll put an Obama sign in my yard and I’ll vote for him in November,” Tesky said.

She was hurt by Hillary’s loss in the primaries, and that the metaphorical glass ceiling withstood the “18 million cracks” it suffered. Tesky also regrets that the Obama camp didn’t at least vet Hillary, out of respect, for vice-presidential consideration. “I don’t even know if she wanted it, but I would have wanted her to have the opportunity.

“I bawled when she offered her concession speech,” she said. “I worked for two years on her campaign.”

But Tesky doesn’t believe that Hillary supporters are in danger of voting en masse for McCain. She thinks that scenario was cooked up as media spin — or by the enemy camp. As for McCain’s commercial last week that sought to draw Hillary supporters over to the other side, Tesky and Fort Miller both found the idea ridiculous.

“The only way I’d be afraid of McCain [winning the votes of Democratic women] was if he chose a woman as his running mate,” concluded Tesky. “I’m 100 percent Democrat. I’d never vote for a Republican.”

Fort Miller echoed, “I want someone who will at least answer to the Democratic Party and for democratic values.”

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Jacob Wheeler is a contributing editor at In These Times.

More information about Jacob Wheeler
Tags   
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Hillary’s speech, a turning point?

    Well, it turned my stomache for sure.

    The idea that all the campaign accusations have now been neutralized and “healing, unity and bliss” replace the rancor and vitriol is sickening.
    The hypocracy is blatant and belief that anyone campaigning is telling the truth or expecting anything they are saying to come to pass is insulting to our intelligence.

    The saddest part is too many people will react like those in the audience last night. I’ve seen smarter looking expressions on the bobble headed figures in a car rear window.

    Posted by whattheheck on Aug 28, 2008 at 12:44 PM

    Senator Clinton did just fine.  I thought it was a moving moment in the Convention.  It’s time to get the Democratic Party together and prevent a repeat of the neo-con disaster of the past seven and a half years.  I am a dedicated Obama supporter, but had the shoe been on the other foot, I would have supported Senator Clinton (perhaps grudgingly, but definitely would have supported her) because there’s no other alternative for any hopes of progressive change.  I think most Clinton supporters will come to that conclusion, too.

    Posted by Brad L on Sep 2, 2008 at 2:30 PM

    Weatherman members Susan Rosenberg and Linda Evans were convicted of transporting 740 pounds of explosives for use in domestic terrorist bombings, and were imprisoned for long terms.

    Hillary had perfect rebuttals for Zero throughout the long Democratic campaign, but she could not use them.

    The last act of the Clinton presidency was to pardon a bunch of exceedingly guilty people, including Rosenberg and Evans.  Bill shot Hill in the foot, because Hill could not bring up the fact that Weatherman bomber Ayers was a political confederate of Zero, without bringing attention to Bill’s pardon of the guilty Rosenberg and Evans. 

    Then Hill shot herself in the other foot.  She could not bring up Zero’s corrupt support for Rezko in the Grove Parc Plaza project nor the waste of $150 million in the Chicago Anneberg Challenge deal between Ayers and Zero, without drawing attention to her own corrupt and fraudulent actions going back decades.

    Hill could have squashed Zero like a bug at any point, except she and Bill could not afford to bring further attention to their own corrupt behavior.

    “Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.”

    But the scenario keeps changing.  If Zero wins in November, he will be thoroughly discredited in ways Carter could only imagine, and there will not be another Demonicrat president in Hill’s lifetime.  But if McCain-Palin win, there could very well be an all-woman contest in 2012 or 2016. 

    Which way, Hill?

    Posted by scorp on Sep 4, 2008 at 1:50 AM
  • register a new account »Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.
Also by Jacob Wheeler
  • El Salvador’s Left Turn?
    Mixed results for 'el frente' in the country's congressional elections.Posted on March 7, 2009
  • GI Skinhead
    An FBI report details white supremacists' recruitment of military personnel.Posted on February 11, 2009
  • An Inauguration Too Big for Words
    The significance of Obama's coronation Tuesday was overwhelming; waving goodbye to Bush, on the other hand, was an emotion much easier to measure.Posted on January 21, 2009
  • El Salvador’s New Left
    Once a guerrilla movement, the FMLN has swapped revolutionary rhetoric for pragmatic politics.Posted on December 10, 2008
  • More U.S. Meddling in El Salvador?
    As El Salvador prepares for elections next year, the Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador worries the Bush administration might interfere to sway results.Posted on October 2, 2008
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS