Views » August 29, 2008 » Web Only

An Unconventional Convention

By David Sirota

When I first heard about the Democratic convention coming to my hometown of Denver, I wasn’t all that excited. For many reasons, in fact, I was pretty unhappy with the whole idea.

As a transplant who moved from the overpopulated East Coast to the more manageable Rocky Mountain West, I was not looking forward to huge crowds taking over what is usually a pretty quiet town. As a D.C.-hater who fled Washington’s career-climbers, I was annoyed that Beltway parasites would be infesting my backyard. And as an activist who has spent a career attacking — and trying to halt — the influence of money on politicians, I was nauseated that a corporate-funded bonanza draped in Democratic Party bunting would take place just a few miles from my house.

Now that the convention is over, I can report that all of what I feared, in fact, took place. Denver’s downtown became a perpetual throng, insufferable Washington hacks from my past were unavoidable, and corporate money was so ubiquitous that even my ticket holder was emblazoned with a Qwest logo.

That said, I can also report that this spectacle actually had value, beyond the free booze and celebrity sightings. Conventions, I discovered, can be building blocks of social change — and if this year’s Democratic convention ends up with any historical legacy beyond nominating Barack Obama, it will likely be remembered as one of many events that helped forge a contemporary progressive movement.

Just outside the convention hall, the disparate threads of progressivism were brought together under one tent — literally. On an empty parking lot, progressive non-profit organizations built a two-story pavilion out of tarp and beams. The Big Tent, as it was called, housed the grassroots groups and new media outlets that are pressuring the Democratic Party to stay true to its progressive base. Meanwhile, new independent films like “Battle In Seattle” — which indict both parties’ economic orthodoxies and are often ignored by major film distributors — found enthusiastic audiences at a nearby movie theater.

Inside the Pepsi Center, the same movement drumbeat broke through the partisan noise.

The tables of live broadcast radio shows teemed not merely with right-wing loudmouths, but also with new left-leaning voices (and news of movement progressive Rachel Maddow getting her own MSNBC show was the hot topic among delegates). Labor leaders celebrated their success in amending the Democratic Party platform with language demanding a reform of Bill Clinton’s NAFTA policies. And the two most talked-about speeches — one an emotional oratory by “liberal lion” Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), the other a populist battle cry by Gov. Brian Schweitzer (D-Mont.) — drove home the convention’s overarching theme: The progressive movement is on the ascent, overtaking the business-backed triangulators that have been running the Democratic Party — and the country — into the ground.

But perhaps the convention’s value was most pronounced at the interpersonal level where liberal activists kibbutzed with campaign operatives, bloggers met politicians, and — as I saw firsthand — potential Obama administration officials began dialoguing with Congress’ most committed progressive leaders.

Standing in the hot sun on the convention’s third day, I happened to be arguing trade policy with Austan Goolsbee, the moderate University of Chicago professor who is Barack Obama’s chief economic adviser. In the corner of my eye, I saw an old Capitol Hill acquaintance, Rep. Peter DeFazio — the progressive champion from Oregon. I introduced the two, and within minutes they were finding points of agreement on economic issues.

Watching these very different Democrats briefly go back and forth, I considered how many similar bridge-building conversations were happening all week. I remembered that while conventions are usually television shows and business-sponsored cocktail parties, they can, at moments, be something more.

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  David, I’ve lived in Denver at times.  Not unusual for a Wyomingite who considers Denver closer than Washington DC.  I was a visitor in 1988 just before the election, and that is the image I carry of “old Denver” because the new buildings on Colfax were mostly unoccupied, and as I took the bus to Casper I had time to reflect on really hard times in the US of A.  Back in East Tennessee we were suffering through yet a year of terrible drought.  The sunflowers in Northern Kansas drooped their misshapen heads.  In Kansas City smoke from the Yellowstone fires shaded the sun and burned the eyes.  In Wyoming the oil boom, which Carter helped after deep drilling became law, was temporarily bust.  Saddest of all was looking at Iowa’s tall corn, frizzled to the height of gehu.  It was the start of “economy stupid.” 
  It’s hard not to think of the 1988 election without thinking of the “Willie Horton” gibe.  And harder still not to be alerted to Corsi and his newest swiftboat book, edited by the same person as was around during the Willie Horton ad.
  When seeds of thought start to sprout, as you believe they have, into an uprising, so come doses of plant killer.  Talk about money!  It’s easy to have a best seller.  Write a provocative book, place it with a collaborative publisher, and then buy up a couple of editions.  In politics, the scorched earth approach works, leaving the newly-awakened to wonder what hit them.

  Posted by MargBass on Aug 29, 2008 at 4:24 PM

  I hope some good can come of this.

  From my TV view all I could think of was Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland who, whenever there was a seemingly insurmountable problem, came up with…

  “Let’s put on a show!”

  (For readers too young to remember — They were the Andy Hardy movies.)

  Posted by whattheheck on Aug 30, 2008 at 3:16 PM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also by David Sirota

• Intelligentsia Against Intelligence
  In the parlance of our times, the term "Idiocracy" means a nation run… morePosted on November 20, 2009
• Where Are the Real Deficit Hawks?
  Let's say you're a congressperson or tea party leader looking to champion deficit… morePosted on November 14, 2009
• We Are What We Trade and How We Trade It
  Trade and globalization--when not referencing blockbuster sports transactions or raucous street protests, debates… morePosted on November 7, 2009
• TARP on Steroids
  I recall that September day like it was yesterday--the explosion so stunning, so… morePosted on October 31, 2009
• A Party With No Punch
  Three parables for progressives and the Grand Old (Democratic) Party. Posted on October 26, 2009