Somali Pirates

French soldiers arrest presumed Somali pirates in the eastern part of the Gulf of Aden off the Somali coast.

Blackwater to Battle Pirates

The private security firm eyes a new market: the high seas.

BY Sanhita SinhaRoy

Blackwater Worldwide and other private security firms are taking to the high seas to battle pirates.

In 2008, pirates attacked more than 100 ships off the coast of Somalia, and, as of early January, roughly 15 ships and 250 crewmembers were being held for ransom.

For months, the U.S. Navy has been part of an international coalition patrolling the Gulf of Aden, a busy shipping lane located off the coast of Somalia. About 20,000 merchant ships pass through the region annually, often traveling between Asia and Europe and carrying an estimated 90 percent of the world’s traded goods. Vessels captured in the Gulf of Aden attract, on average, a ransom of $2 million.

Blackwater began offering anti-piracy services in October and reports that it has been in contact with more than 70 companies inquiring about protection. In early December, officials from the North Carolina-based security firm were in London to woo potential clients, including shipping and insurance companies. So far, it has not received any contracts.

Blackwater Spokeswoman Anne Tyrrell says, “interest is definitely there” to hire private firms. “This is a partial solution to a huge problem. When you’re faced with a threat as large as what cargo is faced with today, it has the potential to really cripple world economies,” says Tyrrell. “We see ourselves as ‘gap fillers.’ ”

Blackwater recently retrofitted a 183-foot ex-research vessel–called the McArthur–to carry up to 45 people, weapons and a helicopter. The ship is currently stateside and Tyrrell says she does not know when it will travel to the Gulf of Aden.

“Sending in private military companies that are armed is something that has not been well thought out,” says Nick Davis, a former British army pilot and CEO of Anti-Piracy Maritime Security Solutions, which provides nonlethal maritime security. “The second that we go down there with private military companies and start popping off pirates, they’ll start doing the same.”

Davis says that “99 percent of the time,” pirates–mostly poor fishermen–fire warning shots. “They do not aim to take you out, they do not aim to kill you. But as soon as they discharge a weapon, you legally would be able, in self defense, to return fire. Nobody that would pick up a weapon for Blackwater would ever fire a warning shot. They would probably just go straight for the kill.”

Aside from Blackwater, other for-hire forces are also looking to cash in from the crisis. Mississippi-based private security company HollowPoint Protective Services and Britain’s Hart Security have reportedly shown interest in providing guards and recovering seized ships.

“My perception all along has been–It’s all about a show of force,” HollowPoint CEO John Harris said on Wired magazine’s website on Nov. 25. “They [the pirates] are looking for something they can pick off and move on to the next target.”

Among private contractors, Blackwater could become the largest and most heavily armed presence in the region.

But outsourcing security has been problematic, as evidenced in Iraq. In December, the Justice Department indicted five Blackwater employees in the 2007 shooting deaths of 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad.

“Security companies haven’t always had the lightest of touches in Iraq, and I think Somalia is a pretty delicate situation,” Roger Middleton, writer of a recent report on piracy in Somalia for Chatham House, a London-based think tank, told the Associated Press in October.

That delicate situation worsened after Somalia’s president resigned abruptly on Dec. 29. The East African country–nearly the size of Texas, with more than 9 million people–has not had a functioning government since 1991.

Amid chaos on land and sea, Somalia will now have to contend with a new U.S.-backed U.N. Security Council resolution that allows foreign forces to take the fight against Somali pirates ashore. The Dec. 16 resolution states that countries and regional organizations–with advance notice from Somalia’s transitional government to the U.N. secretary-general–“may undertake all necessary measures that are appropriate in Somalia, for the purpose of suppressing acts of piracy and armed robbery at sea.”

But the maneuver could backfire, instead serving as a rallying point for Islamic insurgents battling the weakened government.

Whether it’s U.N. forces or private contractors fighting piracy, captive crewmembers in Somalia remain in danger, says Davis of Anti-Piracy Maritime Security Solutions: “The pirates don’t know Blackwater from Adam, and that’s the problem.”

Sanhita SinhaRoy was managing editor at In These Times from 2007 to 2009. She now works on the editorial staff of Playboy magazine.

More information about Sanhita SinhaRoy

  • Reader Comments

    Well, of course you want Blackwater for the job.

    How’s a mere soldier supposed to distinguish between a tanker moving slowly through a known pirate area DRAGGING A LADDER IN THE WATER and a cargo vessel that’s actually earning more than the cost of insurance, crew, and fuel?

    Whereas, Blackwater has demonstrated their “discretion” in these matters time and time again. I’m sure they’re quite sensitive to a word in the right ear, telling them which ships’ cargoes are worth more than the insurance value of the hull.

    Posted by romeopapa on Feb 3, 2009 at 5:25 PM

    I will try to temporarily ignore the fact that “several hundred years ago,” English trade off the coast of Africa was the Triangle Trade (manufactured goods taken from England to Africa; slaves from Africa to the Americas; and sugar from the American plantations back to England.) All the same, this could hardly be seen as “trade” in any good sense.
    dedicated server

    Posted by Sandwich.butter on May 18, 2010 at 1:58 AM

    Hmm, Somalia has been in a state of complete chaos on and off for a couple of decades. International law doesn’t seem very big there. If it was – there wouldn’t be any pirates…… Or the UN would be able to stamp out the piracy threat, using member states’ existing navies. Without recourse to any private navy. Anyway, what is international law on the high seas? Who enforces it?

    Are international governments like cash-strapped Tudor monarchs, forced to pursue their international objectives through fortune-seekers who’ll do the monarchs’ dirty work while enriching themselves?

    check silver bangle for your wedding.

    Posted by ismymaninlove84 on May 31, 2010 at 5:47 AM

    Maybe protecting the East India Company sounds a more respectable instance of the use of private naval warfare contractors than if you think of privateers in terms of the Pirates-of-the-Caribbean. Indeed, maybe, international co-operation can’t stamp out piracy in the Gulf of Aden. But in that case, what chance would an ad hoc private navy have?
    More from VoA: used engines

    Posted by ismymaninlove84 on May 31, 2010 at 5:48 AM

    Amid chaos on land and sea, Somalia will now have to contend with a new U.S.-backed NVidia Grafiktreiber Update. Security Council resolution that allows foreign forces to take the fight against Somali pirates ashore. The Dec. 16 resolution states that countries and regional organizations— Amarok Features with advance notice from Somalia’s transitional government to the U.N. secretary-general Window 7—”may undertake all necessary measures Prana Framework that are appropriate in Somalia, for the purpose of suppressing acts of piracy and armed robbery at sea.”

    Posted by Sandwich.butter on Jun 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 8 posts.