Views » April 17, 2009 » Web Only

Columbine Questions We Still Don’t Ponder

By David Sirota

As Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold’s posthumous infamy turns 10 on April 20, I wish I were surprised that Columbine-like shootings are still happening, or even that our national discussion about violence hasn’t yet matured past gun control and video games.

I wish I were surprised, but sadly, I’d be surprised if it were any different because we still refuse to ask the most uncomfortable questions.

Columbine was the “Pulp Fiction” of violence: not the first of its genre, but the model to which all contemporaries are compared. And lately, Columbine derivatives have been coming at a faster clip.

After each tragedy, it’s the same thing. Liberals want us to wonder why gun laws let anyone access deadly weapons. Conservatives insist we question why video games supposedly turn down-to-earth kids into murderers.

These queries satiate two desires. In a country that ascribes hubristic “exceptionalism” to itself and berates self-analysis as “hating America,” we seek absolution via scapegoat, and so we upbraid bogeymen like firearms and Xboxes. Similarly, in a democracy increasingly conducting its politics through red-blue filters and 140-character Twitter updates, we crave Occam’s razors — and none are sharper than oversimplified arguments about gun control and video games.

But what about the questions and answers that aren’t so simple?

For example, isn’t violence a predictable byproduct of our economy? When torture victims are waterboarded, they freak out. When a winner-take-all economy tortures society, should we be shocked that a few lunatics go over the edge?

For three decades, we converted our economy into one that enriches the rich and stresses out everyone else. Paychecks dwindled, debts accumulated, health-care bills spiked. We now spend more hours working or seeking work, and fewer hours on parenting, family time and rest—all while schools and mental-health services deteriorate.

Considering this, shouldn’t we expect the recent Associated Press story telling us “the American home is becoming more violent” because of the recession? Shouldn’t we expect the new Department of Homeland Security report saying that “the economic downturn” is “invigorating rightwing extremist activity, specifically the white supremacist and militia movements”? And, ultimately, shouldn’t we expect the deep alienation that may lead the occasional troubled kid to turn video-game fantasies into real-world terror?

If these questions don’t make you uneasy, then how about this one: Are those video games fantasies, or are they representations of real violence that we willfully organize our economy around?

Today, one in every three dollars the government spends goes to defense and security. The killing machine and adventurism that money manufactures has delivered 1 million Iraqi casualties, thousands of American casualties and an implicit promise of future wars—indeed, of permanent war.

Perpetuating this expenditure, bloodshed and posture in a nation of dwindling resources, humanitarian self-images and anti-interventionist impulses requires a culture constantly selling violence as a necessity. It’s not just video games—it’s the nightly news echoing Pentagon propaganda and “hawkish” politicians equating militarism with patriotism and “embedded” journalism cheering on wars and every other suit-and-tie-clad industry constantly forwarding the assumption that killing is a legitimate form of national ambition and self-expression. Is it any wonder that a few crazies apply that ethos to their individual lives, and begin seeing violence as a reasonable means to express their own emotions?

Sure, the assault weapons ban’s expiration is an abomination. Absolutely, some video games are appalling. But we could ban all guns and video games and there would still be mass murders because neither the availability of firearms nor of Grand Theft Auto creates the original desire for violence.

Until we face that complex reality—or at least ask different questions—we’ll continue being terrorized by Columbine killers.

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Once again, Mr. Sirota hits the nail on the head when he points out how much we’ve become a “winner take all” society. Sadly, even the progressive community in the US has somehow lost track of the socio-economic issues that have created the disaster we have today.  Few have cared about not only the loss of certain fundamental legal rights for our poor,  as a result of welfare “reform”, but about the very real suffering and hopelessness of our poor today.  They don’t seem to grasp our welfare “reform”, by turning the poor into a bottom-wage temp help workforce without basic rights, has impacted wages and workers’ rights and protections for the working and middle classes. There is no outrage that all the money taken out of humanitarian aid for Americans was poured into the bank accounts of corporations/the rich (in the form of “tax relief” measures). They seem unaware of such concepts as “the common good” or social justice.  There is no simple, human compassion as we’ve embraced a purely sink-or-swim mentality—and so many people are now sinking! 

  In short, people bought into the anti-poor rhetoric of the past 30+ years, at their own expense. We no longer grasp how we’re all interconnected.  Failing to recognize these things, and thereby learning to accept the “winner take all” system, there has been virtually no protest (much less, outrage) about the very policies that have caused the dramatic deterioration of the quality of life, etc., that we see in the US today.

  Posted by dhfabian on May 17, 2009 at 2:54 PM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also by David Sirota

• The Case for Choosing Life
  Judging by Tim Tebow's much-hyped Super Bowl ad, "choose life" remains conservatives' favorite… morePosted on February 5, 2010
• Our Addiction to Disaster Porn
  The black t-shirt--so tight, so come-hither. And oh, those safari button-downs--joke-worthy on Eddie… morePosted on January 30, 2010
• Democratic Corporatism Brings Reagan Back from the Grave
  "After months of struggling to find their footing, it looks like the GOP… morePosted on January 23, 2010
• Right Is Not Center, But 2010 Resembles 1984
  "War is peace, freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength" -- more than… morePosted on January 15, 2010
• Why Year One Matters
  Don’t listen to apologists who say Obama’s first year in office is not important, and who insist Americans must be patient for change.Posted on January 4, 2010