News » July 10, 2009

Sewer Socialism Down the Drain?

Activists in Milwaukee fight to keep their city’s water system in public hands.

By Roger Bybee

On June 15th, more than 200 people demonstrated at a Milwaukee City Hall rally to protest the city's proposed plan to privatize its water system. (Photo courtesy Institute for Wisconsin's Future.)

Those fighting privatization of water hold no illusions about winning a permanent victory.

Public water, one of the most important legacies of Milwaukee’s Socialist Party, which led the city almost continuously from 1910 to 1960, is now under attack from those who see a chance to convert this fundamental resource into a profit stream via privatization.

In the name of coping with rising deficits, privatization advocates led by City Comptroller Wally Morics have proposed leasing the water system to private operators for 75 to 99 years.

Once the city moved to hire consultants on the water privatization proposal, it tapped into a broad current of citizen outrage in favor of preserving a vital part of “the commons,” as public water advocates put it. The grassroots opposition to privatization came to a head at a June 12 rally of some 300 pumped-up citizens outside Milwaukee’s City Hall. Environmentalists, health advocates, unionists, senior citizens and youth activists were present.

“Public water is a trust that belongs to all of us,” declared Cheryl Nenn, the interim executive director of the Milwaukee Riverkeepers. “Where there has been privatization, jobs have been lost and benefits cut for workers, while monitoring of water quality has been cut or eliminated, and prices have risen.”

“We must stand for public ownership of public water,” thundered Jim Godsil, long-time activist and editor of the web-zine Milwaukee Renaissance.

Public water plays an unusually central role in Milwaukee’s history. The advent of a public system in the late 1800s meant a major drop in water-borne diseases like cholera and typhus in Milwaukee. However, the system favored the lucrative provision of water to wealthy suburbs over poorer city districts incapable of paying high rates. Only the election of Socialists in 1910 extended the public system to the entire city, including the heavily working-class and Polish South Side.

Milwaukee has already experienced the privatization of the other element of its water infrastructure, the sewage system, enacted under former Mayor John Norquist, a “New Democrat” darling of the Wall Street Journal editorial page.

Norquist and the city brought in United Water, a subsidiary of French-owned multinational Suez Environnement, promising cost savings and major benefits. Unfortunately, United Water cut staff by one-third, cut back on quality control and unleashed numerous discharges of millions of gallons of untreated sewage into Lake Michigan.

The city terminated its contract with United Water but kept the system in private hands and recently turned the sewage system over to another French firm, Veolia.

Numerous U.S. cities that have privatized their water supply—Atlanta, Ga., Indianapolis and Gary, Ind., Stockton, Calif., and Hoboken, N.J., among others—have experienced a variety of severe problems including sharp price increases, infrastructure failures and plummeting water quality.

At a public hearing on June 15 jammed with privatization foes, a gun-shy City Council committee decided to shelve the water privatization idea. However, key city officials insist that the idea of privatization remains on the table.

Those fighting privatization hold no illusions about winning a permanent victory. “They temporarily shelved it because of the public outcry, and they’re temporarily back-pedaling,” says the Riverkeepers’ Nenn.

“So we’ll keep educating people about why privatizing is harmful and build a broader base of support for our coalition,” she adds firmly. “Whether it’s South Africa or Bolivia or the inner city of Milwaukee, poor people can’t afford to pay what the privatizers want to charge.”

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  sorry but somre thngs must stay public….

  Posted by hagay levy on Jul 11, 2009 at 7:10 PM

  Trying to hold on to this is going to be difficult when it shouldn’t!

  Posted by Tracy Daters on Jul 13, 2009 at 8:12 PM

  this is crazy, how can this not be public?

  Posted by gq ganstah on Jul 13, 2009 at 8:16 PM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also featured Falling Through the Climate Gap
Power of the People
We’re Public ... No, We’re Private

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by Roger Bybee

• The Shipping Point
  Between China and big box stores, minimum wage ‘temp’ workers take a stand.Posted on December 18, 2009
• The Pillage People
  One year after the Wall Street bailout, real reform of the financial sector is still a dream. Posted on October 30, 2009
• Taming Wall Street Cowboys
  A new advocacy group heads to Capitol Hill to counter financial industry lobbyists hungry for deregulation.Posted on August 26, 2009
• Dixie Media Versus Unions
  A new book reveals how Southern media have strengthened the region's corporatocracy.Posted on August 20, 2009
• Auto Task Force Outsources Jobs
  Obama's recovery plan steers GM and Chrysler in the wrong direction
.Posted on June 12, 2009