Help In These Times raise $5,000 in two weeks! Donate now!
PrintDiscuss
Views » August 8, 2009 » Web Only

The Me-First, Screw-Everyone-Else Crowd

By David Sirota

With 22,000 of their fellow countrymen dying annually for lack of health insurance, this group is using the argot of fairness and morality to hide its real motive: selfish greed.
Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller

I know I should be mortified by the lobbyist-organized mobs of angry Brooks Brothers mannequins who are now making headlines by shutting down congressional town hall meetings. I know I should be despondent during this, the Khaki Pants Offensive in the Great American Healthcare and Tax War. And yet, I’m euphorically repeating one word over and over again with a big grin on my face.

Finally.

Finally, there’s no pretense. Finally, the Me-First, Screw-Everyone-Else Crowd’s ugliest traits are there for all to behold.

The group’s core gripe is summarized in a letter I received that denounces a proposed surtax on the wealthy and corporations to pay for universal healthcare:

“Until recently, my family was in the top 3 percent of wage earners,” the affluent businessperson fumed in response to my July column on taxes. “We are in the group that pays close to 60 percent of this nation’s taxes … Think for a second how you would feel if you built a business and contributed more than your share to this country only to be treated like a pariah.”

This sob story about the persecuted rich fuels today’s “Tea Parties”—and I’m sure you’ve heard some version of it in your community.

I’m also fairly certain that when many of you run into the Me-First, Screw-Everyone-Else Crowd, you don’t feel like confronting the faux outrage. But on the off chance you do muster the masochistic impulse to engage, here’s a guide to navigating the conversation:

What They Will Scream: We can’t raise business taxes, because American businesses already pay excessively high taxes!

What You Should Say: Here’s the smallest violin in the world playing for the businesses. The Government Accountability Office reports that most U.S. corporations pay zero federal income tax. Additionally, as even the Bush Treasury Department admitted, America’s effective corporate tax rate is the third lowest in the industrialized world.

What They Will Scream: But the rich still “pay close to 60 percent of this nation’s taxes!”

What You Should Say: Such statistics refer only to the federal income tax. When considering all of “this nation’s taxes” including payroll, state and local levies, the top 5 percent pay just 38.5 percent of the taxes.

What They Will Scream: But 38.5 percent is disproportionately high! See? You’ve proved that the rich “contribute more than their share” of taxes!

What You Should Say: Actually, they are paying almost exactly “their share.” According to the data, the wealthiest 5 percent of America pays 38.5 percent of the total taxes precisely because they make just about that share—a whopping 36.5 percent!—of total national income. Asking these folks to pay slightly more in taxes—and still less than they did during the go-go 1990s—is hardly extreme.

Stripped of facts, your conversation partner will soon turn to unscientific terrain, claiming it is immoral to “steal” and “redistribute” income via taxes. Of course, he will be specifically railing on “stealing” for stuff like healthcare, which he insists gets “redistributed” only to the undeserving and the “lazy” (a classic codeword for “minorities”). But he will also say it’s OK that government sent trillions of dollars to Wall Streeters.

And that’s when you should stop wasting your breath.

What you’ve discovered is that the Me-First, Screw-Everyone-Else Crowd isn’t interested in fairness, empiricism or morality.

With 22,000 of their fellow countrymen dying annually for lack of health insurance and with Warren Buffett paying a lower effective tax rate than his secretary, the Me-First, Screw-Everyone-Else Crowd is merely using the argot of fairness, empiricism and morality to hide its real motive: selfish greed.

No argument, however rational, is going to cure these narcissists of that grotesque disease.

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
David Sirota is a senior editor at In These Times and author of the bestselling books The Uprising and Hostile Takeover. He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com.

More information about David Sirota
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    “Advocates of capitalism are very apt to appeal to the sacred principles of liberty, which are embodied in one maxim: The fortunate must not be restrained in the exercise of tyranny over the unfortunate.” (B. Russell)

    Demos (http://www.demos.org/inequality/numbers.cfm) shows that the top 10% makes roughly 90% of US income, and that the top 1% owns roughly 40% of stock. Where specifically did you get your data?

    Posted by James Rolko on Aug 8, 2009 at 5:23 PM

    That is just how rich people are. they want everyone else who is poor to die…or stay poor. They want to horde all the resources for themselves and dont want to waste them on ‘lesser’ beings

    Posted by Sarah Shane on Aug 9, 2009 at 1:46 AM

    It seems to me, that ever since (Pres. Rat) Reagan told us that our greed was good: We’re entitled, We’re ‘special’ (We’re Americans!), we’ve been in moral decline. What had been the turf of only the rich, could now be Ours! Whoopeee!

    How else do you explain today’s under-class (kid working at the video store down the street) Republicans? They seem to have this grand delusion that one day, they will jetee’ off with the rich and famous, leaving their powerless and impoverished beginnings far behind. So, they continue to vote against their own (real) best interests.

    The lack of Americans prepared to discuss the topic is blatantly evidenced right here, as there are so few comments. Problem? What problem? Hmmmmm….

    Posted by wanzellarts on Aug 10, 2009 at 6:14 AM

    I have watched all the coverage and ti is fair to say the the right wing coverage (FOXincludes everything the left wing coverage has but the left wing coverage (MSNBC NY TIMES Etc) clearly omits much of the damning factors about the media maipulation going on here.

    MOst people are genuine in their feawr and distrust of the government and these health care meetings are bring the chikens home to roost.

    Posted by tgtg on Aug 10, 2009 at 7:43 PM

    I am sorry to be so blunt, but it is an absolute lie that all or most of the townhall protesters are selfish rich people.

    From what I have seen, they are mostly retired are near retirement middle and low income seniors who are terrified that the half-trillion marked to be pulled from an already underfunded Medicare program to fund universal care - will hit them unfairly. 

    All while Obama is talking about cutting unnecessary and wasteful treatments for old people.

    “Tell her she doesn’t need that pace-maker - she can just go take a pill.”

    Posted by Parker1227 on Aug 10, 2009 at 8:06 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 29 posts.

Also by David Sirota
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS