Culture » August 28, 2009

Why Kansas Matters

A new documentary details how politics and religion intersect in America.

By John K. Wilson

An eccentric Kansan. (Photo courtesy of What’s the Matter with Kansas?)

The new documentary What’s the Matter With Kansas? is a funny, smart and important look at the intersection of religion and politics in America today. Loosely based on the 2004 book by Thomas Frank, it tells the stories of several conservative Kansans who care deeply about hot-button cultural issues like abortion and gay marriage. According to Frank’s polemical thesis, Republicans succeeded in getting poor whites to vote against their own economic self-interest by focusing on these issues.

However, filmmakers Laura Cohen and Joe Winston devote little of the film’s 90 minutes to Frank and his argument, focusing instead on the lives and motives of their subjects. The documentary begins by following a Democratic canvasser who visits the home of a Republican who explains that he could never support the Democrats because they’re “pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, pro-gun control.” Then it shifts to a market where the Kansas Democrats booth can’t attract a crowd, while the “Choose Life” booth is busy signing up recruits and selling plastic babies for 25 cents.

Frank’s book and this movie are both vulnerable to accusations of condescending elitism, Frank for his thesis and the movie for its focus on the eccentric Kansas personalities. To be sure, the film sometimes provokes laughter at its subjects’ expense, such as on the Barden family’s trip to the always-ridiculous Creation Museum in Petersburg, Ky. Still, the depth of the connection that develops between the subjects and filmmakers—and, eventually, the audience—stops this from being mere mockery.

In the hands of someone determined to ridicule conservatives, Angel Dillard’s CD release party, featuring performances of such tracks as “When Satan Comes A-Callin’”, would make an easy target. But that scene comes late in the film, after we’ve learned to understand her as a person rather than as a stereotype. As Joe Winston noted in the Q&A that followed a Chicago screening, “This movie’s all about not generalizing about people.”

The movie briefly traces the history of the conservative movement in Kansas, which blossomed in 1991 during the anti-abortion “Summer of Mercy” blockades in Wichita. Mark Gietzen recalls how he recruited people there to run for precinct committeeman, and an overwhelming number won. By 1994, popular Democratic Rep. Dan Glickman lost. He was beaten, he says, by “people who had never been involved in politics.” Glickman reports that he did best in the high-income, Republican parts of his district.

It wasn’t all about abortion. Glickman was also hurt by his pro-NAFTA stance. Dale Swenson, a union worker, recalls, “I thought, ‘Well, there’s nothing left for me to vote for in the Democratic Party.’ ” This point is the other part of Frank’s argument: Republicans may be fooling working- and middle-class voters with the culture wars, but Democrats are equally responsible for their losses by refusing to stand up for economic values. Others in the documentary have a similar view, such as Kansas Farmers Union president Donn Teske, who resigned from the Republican Party but notes, “I’m a populist without a party.”

What’s the Matter With Kansas? doesn’t fully answer the question in its title. But it provides a funny, in-depth analysis of the intersections between religion, economics and politics. It’s a movie that needs to be seen in both red and blue states, by liberals and conservatives alike.

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  All the while…ROME BURNS ! ! ! !..Again a little common-sense can go a looong way….........

  Posted by blackhorse on Sep 2, 2009 at 7:37 PM

  ... hot-button cultural issues like abortion and gay marriage.  According to Frank’s polemical thesis, Republicans succeeded in getting poor whites to vote against their own economic self-interest by focusing on these issues.
  ...
  Frank’s book and this movie are both vulnerable to accusations of condescending elitism, Frank for his thesis and the movie for its focus on the eccentric Kansas personalities.

  Oh, I doubt if there is any organized or disorgaized effort by anyone to persuade anybody “to vote against their own economic self-interest” by invoking “hot-button cultural issues.”  The effort would have to be massive, and there is no evidence for it.  But we do object to elitists, condescending or not, that tell us things that are not true and piss away our tax money foolishly: 

  For example: The War on Poverty.  Everyone is against poverty.  Only elitists could screw up an effort so badly.  The elitists’ War on Poverty utterly wasted $6.6 trillion over a thirty-year period and ended in fraud and corruption.  Even Clinton got that one right.  At a modest 3% interest rate, our money wasted by elitists on the War on Poverty is greater than the entire national debt ($9 trillion) just two short years ago.  It was elitist Democrats that “succeeded in getting poor whites to vote against their own economic self-interest” in the War on Poverty.

  Of course, one short year ago was when the elitists’ mortgage follies came home to roost, another trillion down the toilet initially, triggering a worldwide markets meltdown that hit $50 trillion.  If the elitists had not pissed away the $6.6 trillion on the War on Poverty, the economy would have been much stronger and there would have been no cause to panic. 

  It is not just Kansans that were hurt by the elitists’ stupidity.  Elite Harvard, the nation’s richest school, took a 30% hit to its endowment, from $37 billion to $26 billion in just one year.  Other elite and non-elite schools took similar hits.  Elite California’s Calpers, the nations largest retirement fund, has lost $56 billion, down from $237 billion, in just one year.  If your retirement funds are hurting, thank an elitist Democrat. 

  Obama is an elitist lawyer, Lenin was an elitist lawyer, and Castro was an elitist lawyer, and all of them are as dumb as dog shit when it comes to practical matters.  Kansans are brilliant in comparison, as the American people have traditionaly been.  The American economy has long been the finest and most free economy in the world, until the elitists started screwing it up starting with LBJ’s War on Poverty.

  Posted by scorp on Sep 11, 2009 at 1:58 PM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also featured COIN Toss
Israel’s Gadfly
The ‘Post-Racial’ President

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by John K. Wilson

• Freedom of Repression
  New ruling will allow censorship of campus publicationsPosted on July 6, 2005