Help In These Times raise $5,000 in two weeks! Donate now!
PrintDiscuss
Views » October 17, 2003

Creating Better Choices

By Joel Bleifuss

Progressives have ideas about what a media strategy should be, but little collective agreement.
Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller
We each inhabit our own individualized media landscape: We choose what we read, what we see and what we hear. But these choices are determined by what is available.

Media corporations hold a near monopoly on the information that the vast majority of us rely on to make sense of the world. This dominant media sets the boundaries of permissible thought, defines our mental horizons, and is the bellwether (literally, the lead sheep in a herd) of our time.

The corporate media provide choice, but within limits that the marketplace sets. Yet the marketplace, while immensely powerful, does not rule absolutely.

We devote this special media issue, not to diagnosing the blight that is the mainstream media—been there, done that—but, rather, to examining the promise offered by progressive media. Progressives have a lot of ideas about what a media strategy should be, but little collective agreement. That is our central challenge. It is hard to see how we can take on the dominant media without an ongoing dialogue and collaborative efforts that harness our desire to create a media landscape that nurtures mental and civic life.

To that end, the writers in this issue explore how we can build media that put people before profits.
What is the progressive media strategy?

Susan J. Douglas, our “Back Talk” columnist, calls on progressives to rediscover “our own agenda-setting roots from the ’60s, study which revisions of them by the right have worked, and then forge ahead.”

What do we need?

Studs Terkel eviscerates “brass check” journalism (“What’s that?” you wonder) and he cautions us to be aware of “the national Alzheimer’s disease” that “keeps people from doing what they know they should do for their own good.” Studs tells us that “the key is not simply to dissent, but to turn the country around. … Now is the time to act, and, thus, become what we were born to be––thinking, active citizens of a democratic society.”

Media critic Norman Solomon takes left-leaning foundations to task for being “hesitant and unwilling to fund media work” unlike the right-wing foundations that “sink millions of dollars a week into aggressive media-savvy propaganda outfits like the Heritage Foundation.”

What can we learn?

David Kusnet, Bill Clinton’s chief speechwriter from 1992 through 1994, argues that progressives must learn a new language. “Speaking everyday language, appealing to common values and developing populist parables—that’s how progressives can communicate to our fellow citizens, not just each other.”

What’s next?

Patricia Aufderheide, an In These Times senior editor, looks to the future and the “astounding implications of digital technology and the Internet.” Because so many media consumers are turning to filtering to escape “data smog,” she calls on progressives to do some hard thinking about how their media can become a filter and a choice. Progressives, she writes, also need “to find allies in reform to demand resources and policies that support public media spaces. Those spaces aren’t left-owned or even left-leaning, but because they are public zones, progressivess have a voice in them that they don’t have in commercial media.”

And, mindful that our media landscape must always include art, humor and a love of life, we conclude with some words from Kurt Vonnegut, who introduces us to Gil Berman, a character from his next novel, If God Were Alive Today.

In the wake of the war in Iraq, Americans are beginning to realize that they have been lied to by their political leaders and an acquiescent mainstream media that routinely parrot the Bush administration. People are hungry for integrity, decency and common sense—all things that a vibrant, progressive media can provide.
  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Joel Bleifuss is the editor and publisher of In These Times, where he has worked as an investigative reporter, columnist and editor since 1986. He is on the board of the Institute for Public Affairs, which publishes In These Times.

More information about Joel Bleifuss
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    A progressive understanding for a sustainable ‘new world order of peace (nwop)’ was sidelined when the value of the ‘peace corp’ was sidelined to an international ‘junior year abroad’.

    Where the progressive educated left could find a vivifying place in the nwop is in using their platform to advocate ‘open borders for labor and cultural lifesupport exchange’ and, thereby, increasing knowledge of ‘the other’.  Give free labor&culture; the same value “free” trade in the nwop!

    Posted by Paul L. Johnson on Oct 20, 2003 at 11:19 AM

    I absolutely agree with your story.  Please have a look at another ‘story’ at www.editorialpaintings.com

    Posted by Gail on Oct 21, 2003 at 12:08 AM

    We definitely need to turn this country around. As we have seen with California, when you let Democrats/Liberals in charge of all 3 branches of government you get- a total freaking disaster.

    Highest debt per capita of any state. Poverty everywhere. Health care eviscerated. Crime exploding. What an embarrassment.

    Posted by LaNea on Oct 22, 2003 at 2:17 PM

    LaNea,

    Bullshit.

    Posted by neil on Oct 24, 2003 at 6:14 AM

    well this is pretty easy. let’s go back to the grassroots. let’s do this thing from the people and for the people. flyers, newspapers, newsreaders,——paste it up baby. wanna telephone pole with our face on it each and every yard? oh yeah. spread the truth. don’t let them hide. keep it up. let the ball roll and roll and roll and roll   ain’t never gonna stop

    Posted by heydooo on Oct 25, 2003 at 8:24 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 7 posts.

Appeared in the November 17, 2003 Issue
Also by Joel Bleifuss
  • Block ’Em, Sock ’Em
    Across the country progressive groups are mobilizing to support legislative initiatives, but to… morePosted on July 9, 2009
  • Buy Back Our Government
    Porn rentals, duck islands and moat-cleaning are among the frivolities British members of… morePosted on June 11, 2009
  • A Specter is Haunting Dems
    Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) had every reason to free himself from the wing… morePosted on May 12, 2009
  • Bailout Bandits
    In these days of "bank stablization plans" (bailouts for fat cats) and "overseas… morePosted on April 16, 2009
  • Building Utopia
    A new documentary profiles the rise and fall of a Depression-era utopian experiment in the Bronx.Posted on April 13, 2009
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS
Help this website survive! Donate to In These Times now!