Bill Ayers speaks out! An In These Times exclusive.

PrintDiscuss
Views » January 19, 2004

Union Makes Us Strong

By Joel Bleifuss

Only by coming together can American labor and progressives change the current political system.
With this issue “Can Labor Lead Again?” In These Times celebrates its 27th anniversary by examining America’s unions and the role they play in leading a progressive movement.

With more than a century of success at bettering the lot of working people, labor provides progressives with a vital lesson. At its heart, the union movement is an exercise in democracy—people joining together to exercise their collective will to improve the lives of themselves, their families and their fellow citizens. Similarly, only by coming together as an organized and strategically focused political force will American labor and progressives be able to change the current political system that puts corporate interests above that of the public good.

In the first editorial focusing on labor and written just weeks after its founding, In These Times underscored the importance of labor unions to developing a united progressive movement. In “Labor and Electoral Politics,” published on November 29, 1976, we observed:
For the left as a whole, the trade union movement is centrally important. Unions are the largest and most consistently active organizations of working people. … The labor movement has provided and continues to provide the richest experience of working people cooperating across lines of race, ethnic origin, sex and age in a common organizational framework and toward common goals.
In the first issue of In These Times, David Moberg critiqued the United Auto Workers’ 1976 contract with Detroit automakers. He followed up in our second issue with the first story in a series on American unions, in which he wrote: “Unions or, more accurately, unionism does give workers a sense of ‘we’ that is one of the main balances to the American cultural emphasis on ‘me.’ … The impact of unions in America today is not only to win wages and benefits but, perhaps even more important, to give workers a small measure of security, a feeling of power, a sense of self worth, defense against arbitrary management authority and a belief in solidarity with other workers.”

With this special issue on labor we continue that tradition of giving the labor movement the coverage it’s due.

Moberg writes today that labor is unified by a “new sense of urgency about organizing,” but “will have to confront serious restructuring, expand its organizational options, and reconcile internal democracy with the need for industrial democracy if it hopes to create its own new tidal wave of expansion.”

Andy Stern, president of the 1.6 million-member Service Employees International Union, writes that “revitalized unions are crucial to a revitalized progressive movement” and that for labor to revitalize it must learn to function as a “united workers’ movement” rather than a “loose trade association of 65 disparate unions.”

Gerald McEntee, president of the 1.4 million-member American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, writes: “To really improve the lives of working men and women, and build lasting power, we must grow our unions by organizing. … [A]nd it is the best way for us to bolster the efforts of the entire progressive community.”

Dorian Warren, of the Chicago Center for Working Class Studies, writes that while the current discussion focuses on how unions can grow and mobilize, the labor movement must learn to recognize that the multiple ethnic, racial, gender and sexual “identities of workers—and the varied and overlapping injustices they face as a result—bring valuable and often underused resources to a union.”

Adam Werbach, former president of the Sierra Club, writes that the Bush administration is compelled to find wedge issues that divide the labor and environmental movements because if “these two groups joined together to support an agenda for working families that included ecological protection, the president could find himself out of a job.”

These stories are followed with snapshots of current labor struggles that illustrate the challenges labor faces today.

This issue of In These Times also celebrates another kind of union, the community of readers who donate above and beyond the cost of their subscription and thus publish this magazine. On page 38 we thank you for helping us through our 27th year.
Joel Bleifuss is the editor of In These Times, where he has worked as an investigative reporter, columnist and editor since 1986. Bleifuss has had more stories on Project Censored's annual list of the "10 Most Censored Stories" than any other journalist.

More information about Joel Bleifuss
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    It has been proven you cannot trust corporations. If they can’t get cheap labor here they move to where they can. Web need strong Unions for all races and gender. We must vote Bush and friends out.

    Posted by Linda on Jan 19, 2004 at 7:03 PM

    I have one perspective on the union movement and that is that it needs to focus on undeveloped countries.  As business seeks its cheapest sources of labor, we stand to lose jobs.  By organizing the workers in undeveloped countries, unions will be able to provide liveable wages for all of the world’s workers. 

    Posted by Jo Warren on Jan 20, 2004 at 9:39 AM

    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    which is why we need global regulation of corporations, otherwise it’s a race to the bottom.

    The current situation of democratic nation-states blackmailed within global corporate anarchism will not only disenfranchise labor, but continue to externalise costs to the living system we call the earth.

    Posted by Matt Quinn on Jan 23, 2004 at 12:19 AM

    I am a General Chairman representing railroad members of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers.  Our National Railroad Agreement (contract) expired December 31, 1999, we have been in negotiations since.  The Carriers Conference wants us to pay, retroactively, for a portion of our health care coverage.  In the past we have taken smaller or no general wage increases in order for the Carriers to continue providing our coverage.  RAilroad machinists rejected the Carrier’s last best final offer in November, 2003 by a vote of 97%.  I have seen nothing outside our internal publications about the way we are being treated by companies that are making billions on hauling freight and coal accross our nation.
    Thanks for keeping Labor in general in your stories.

    Posted by Mark Russ on Jan 23, 2004 at 2:20 AM

    I am unconvinced that the unions can do anything about the problems of workers - or that they would really want to. They don’t dare challenge immigration, which allows the US to import cheap labor and disinvest in its own population, for fear of being criticized as xenophobic or racist or some other such crap. So with imported cheap labor undermining wages and conditions - which is why we are now looking at a situation where many Americans won’t even get paid for overtime - what can the unions do? Sweet FA.

    Posted by James Paterson on Jan 26, 2004 at 12:02 AM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 6 posts.

Appeared in the February 16, 2004 Issue
Also by Joel Bleifuss
  • We Have Much to Celebrate
    Next year, President Barack Obama and the solidly Democratic Congress can pass… morePosted on November 20, 2008
  • Demons Out!
    The neocons who sold Americans the Iraq War are working hand in… morePosted on October 14, 2008
  • United We Fail
    This election year, the bandwagon to fix the healthcare system barrels along.… morePosted on September 16, 2008
  • Keep the Heat on Obama
    In 1992, when Bill Clinton won the Democratic nomination, Washington progressives --… morePosted on August 19, 2008
  • EPA on Trial
    For more than six years, Hugh Kaufman has been battling the Environmental… morePosted on July 14, 2008
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS