Views » February 2, 2004

Reparations Suit Leaves Opening

By Salim Muwakkil

Chicago has become the de facto center of the slavery reparations movement. Alderman Dorothy Tillman organized the first national reparations conference in 2001 and was the prime mover of a city ordinance that supports congressional hearings on reparations. Tillman later successfully lobbied the City Council to pass the Slave Era Disclosure Act, an ordinance that requires companies doing business with the city to reveal connections to slavery. Chicago was the first large city to pass such legislation.

The city also is home base to Conrad Worrill, chair of the National Black United Front and one of the nation’s leading reparations advocates. Worrill convened a host of conferences and symposia related to the issue of reparations and organized a national reparations march in 2002.

There was a time, not long ago, when the issue of reparations for slavery and Jim Crow apartheid was barely broached in polite company. Even civil rights activists found the subject too incendiary. The quest for reparations was pursued primarily by fringe Black Nationalist groups and was considered a distant issue for the average African American. In fact, reparations advocates often were ridiculed for pushing what was considered an implausible scheme.

In November 1999, a Washington Post story on the subject started like this: “The subject is scalding hot, untouchable as public policy. Even the brave run from it.”

Times sure have changed.

Chicago may be leading the pack, but pro-reparations resolutions have passed in city council chambers across the country, including Cleveland, Detroit, Washington, D.C., Baltimore, Los Angeles and Oakland, Calif. Most of these resolutions urge support for a bill annually introduced by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) that seeks “to establish a commission to examine the institution of slavery … and economic discrimination against African-Americans … to make recommendations to the Congress on appropriate remedies.”

Last month, two Chicago courtrooms served as venues for debating such remedies. In January, a class-action suit was filed seeking reparations for descendants of enslaved Africans from 71 defendants, including banks and tobacco and cotton firms, alleging they did not comply with Chicago’s Slave Era Disclosure Act. The suit was filed by Bob Brown, a longtime activist and co-director of a group called Pan-African Roots, and does not seek financial damages. Rather, it calls for defendants to release files and records to account for all profits accrued from slavery. Later that month, U.S. District Court Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr. also dismissed a class-action reparations suit alleging that companies like the Lehman Brothers brokerage firm, Aetna Insurance, FleetBoston Financial Corp. and R. J. Reynolds Tobacco were “unjustly enriched” by slavery.

Other reparations lawsuits filed around the country were consolidated in the case before Norgle, and his decision dismisses their suits as well.

However, the judge ruled “without prejudice,” leaving the door open for further litigation. There is little doubt such litigation will come. A team of lawyers dubbed the Reparations Assessment Group—an association of legal heavyweights including Harvard’s Charles Ogletree and Johnnie Cochran—is reportedly planning a high-powered legal action beyond the strategy of class-action suits, and members of Harvard’s highly regarded and well connected “dream team” of black public intellectuals are mobilizing their talents to force a national discussion on the issue.

It’s safe to say that the issue of reparations has arrived. And that’s a good thing. Our slavery-tainted past prevents us from coming to grips with our racially divided present. How else can we explain our nation’s wide racial disparities without factoring in the legacy of slavery? The reparations idea provides a conceptual framework for understanding the crippling affects of that legacy and suggests possible remedies.

Norgle argued in his ruling: “The injury alleged cannot be ‘conjectural or hypothetical.’ While most would like to assume that they will be beneficiaries to their ancestor’s wealth upon their demise, this is a mere assumption.”

By reducing racial disparities to an “assumption,” Norgle adheres to a long tradition. But few social scientists would deny that 14 generations of slavery and another century of apartheid were transferred through the generations in inferior social status and poor quality of such things as employment, education and healthcare.

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Could somebody come up with a realistic plan on distributing reparations? Let’s just say, o.k., we’ll pay. Now just tell me exactly who gets what.

  Black leaders never provide a specific plan. Why? “We’re not there yet, we have to say we get them first”.

  If you don’t provide a reasonable plan and settle obvious difficulties this will never, ever be settled.

  And to be honest this has to be done in Congress. Every failed lawsuit damages the movement more and more. Its never going to will on legal grounds. Its a pipe dream to think otherwise.

  So I suggest: Come up with a specific plan and take it to the people and the Congress.

  Posted by Tokki on Feb 2, 2004 at 9:30 PM

  great- so my parents that came from sweden, who had nothing to do with this, have to pay african-americans reparations? what are they guilty of exactly? and what about the families of the northerners who fought the south? so a great-grand child has to pay reparations b/c her great grandad died fighting a war that freed the slaves? oh, and i suppose we pay money to all the haitians who have come here recently?

  
  right. right

  Posted by Thom on Feb 3, 2004 at 3:12 AM

  “How else can we explain our nationís wide racial disparities without factoring in the legacy of slavery?”

  Try, for starters, the fact that 70% of black children are born bastards.  I think it’s safe to say that has a lot more to do with the black population’s problems than anything that happened to their long-dead ancestors. 

  One thing is for sure, though.  Racial disparities will continue as long as black “leaders” continue to blame their peoples’ problems on others instead of addressing the real problems.  Blacks will never see any reparations, that’s for sure. 

  Posted by Tom on Feb 3, 2004 at 6:31 AM

  The U.S. government’s greatest fear concerning the Reparations Movement is not suits which can be easily blocked within its own biased judicial system.  Rather it is the seldom-publicized legal battle which has been unfolding inside the United Nations for the past decade.  Diverse African-American activists and scholars, including the Honorable Silis Muhammad, have made many interventions before the Human Rights Commission in Geneva and presented detailed evidence of how the USA has been violating U.N. Covenants by imposing ethnocide and forced assimilation upon Afro-Descendants as a people.  The goal of this arm of the Movement is to secure Human Rights, Reparations and Restoration for our people, including the right to Self-Determination.  Enough evidence has now been presented to warrant the U.N. placing a Reparations Sanction upon the U.S. government, hopefully within a short time frame.
  Sincerely,
  Malik Al-Arkam
  www.AllForReparations.org

  Posted by Malik Al-Arkam on Feb 3, 2004 at 1:58 PM

  Ha Ha Ha!  Malik, get your head out of your ass.  Do you really think the US is going to cough up that money just because the UN might tell us to?  What a great service you’re doing your people, telling them that their plight is everybody’s fault but their own and that, one of these days, the government’s going to give them a pile of money and that will make everything better.  I hope Castro, Gadhafi, and the rest of the killers on the UN Human Rights Commission do sanction us.  That might be the only thing that could make all this talk of reparations more ridiculous. 

  Posted by Tom on Feb 3, 2004 at 3:46 PM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 17 posts.

Also featured Devil in the Details
Decoding Dubya
False Crusader

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by Salim Muwakkil

• The ‘Post-Racial’ President
  Barack Obama navigates a world where color still matters. Posted on August 24, 2009
• Government-Assisted Terrorists
  On May 20, federal and New York City authorities arrested four men on… morePosted on June 16, 2009
• The Irony of Obama’s Boycott
  America's first black president refused to attend a U.N. conference on racism.Posted on April 30, 2009
• African-Americans Back Burris
  The African-American community's unified efforts to retain Roland Burris as the lone black… morePosted on March 26, 2009
• Will Holder Hold Cops Accountable?
  Eric Holder, the first African-American attorney general, takes over a Department of Justice… morePosted on February 26, 2009