Views » February 9, 2004

Was Willie Horton Gay?

By Harvey Wasserman

Few Americans now remember that George W. Bush’s father was elected president in 1988 by using convicted murderer Willie Horton in one of the most racist ad campaigns ever staged in the United States. Now George Jr. seems poised to follow in those tainted footsteps.

But the “issue” this time won’t be race, it’ll be gay marriage.

Early in the 1988 campaign, then-Vice President George H.W. Bush trailed then-Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis by as much as 15 points in the mainstream polls. Bush was sunk in a scandal-ridden Reagan administration whose trademark was Iran-Contra, the bizarre scam in which Reaganites illegally sold arms to Iranian fanatics and slipped the profits to right-wing Contra rebels trying to overthrow the duly elected Sandinista government of Nicaragua. Reagan also sold the technology for making chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction to Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Reagan’s envoy to Saddam was now-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

Reagan was always more popular with the media than with the general public. Constantly proclaiming support for a balanced budget amendment, Reagan left the largest deficits in U.S. history (until the coming of George W. Bush).

George H.W. Bush’s run against Dukakis was hampered by his aloof, upper-crust lack of charisma. His running mate Senator Dan Quayle of Indiana was noted mainly for his deer-in-headlights demeanor. In a crucial televised debate, Quayle was utterly demolished by Texas Sen. Lloyd Bentsen, his Democratic opponent.

But the Bush-Quayle team had a trump card—racism. Lee Atwater, the Karl Rove of his day, was a hard-driving, below-the-belt dirty trickster. Atwater seized on Horton, a black prisoner who’d been paroled from the Massachusetts penal system and then committed murder.

Atwater filled the airwaves with brutally racist black-and-white ads meant to make Horton and Dukakis seem blood-related. One included a mug shot of Horton that aimed to stoke, in the words of ad creator Larry McCarthy, “every suburbuan mother’s greatest fear.” The ads helped send the Democrats into a tailspin. Atwater later developed a brain tumor, and repented what he had done.

Rove may soon step into Atwater’s shoes. Recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court against anti-sodomy laws and the Massachusetts Supreme Court’s support for gay marriage have thrown the Christian right.

For Rove, gay marriage is the new Willie Horton, a wedge issue perfectly suited to fire up the right-wing church network while diverting public attention from an ailing economy and a failing war effort.

Ironically, Vice President Dick Cheney’s daughter Mary is an openly declared lesbian. Cheney has defended gay rights in general but now supports Bush’s demand for a Constitutional amendment that would prevent the states from allowing gay marriages—including, presumably, one that might involve Mary Cheney. But as David Brock has observed in Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative (paperback, Three Rivers Press, 2003), a number of closeted gay Republicans have found the increasingly homophobic GOP a hard place to be.

Rove, in turn, has not hesitated to attack Brock and anyone else opposing the Republican juggernaut. Bush already has let it be known that he will support a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, and the Foxist media is starting to treat this as a major issue.

The major Democratic candidates are on record as approving gay civil unions, which are somewhat different from gay marriage. But the Bush/Rove GOP is unlikely to make such fine distinctions—any more than George H.W. Bush belabored the legal intricacies of the Willie Horton parole. Nor will they refrain from smearing other Democrats, whatever their actual stance, with the nastiest possible slant on gay rights.

What Bush senior and Lee Atwater did to promote racism in American presidential campaigns, George W. and Karl Rove are poised to do for homophobia.

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  “brutally racist black-and-white ads”

  C’mon, you are killing me!

  How is it “ironic” that Cheney’s daughter is gay?

  Posted by Nus on Feb 9, 2004 at 1:21 PM

  It is not surprising that the Bush administration would attempt to use such a tactic. That a father (Cheney) would support a homophobic constitutional amendment when his own daughter is homosexual points rather clearly to the true morals and values of some members of today’s GOP. Bush, Cheney, et al., have shown themselves to be unfeeling, unsympathetic, and primarily concerned with their own biases and prejudices rather than the best interests of the nation.

  The spirit of the US constitution is about *freedom*, about *liberty*--not about restricting and vilifying people based on race, religion, OR sexual preference.

  Regardless of one’s opinion concerning homosexuality--it is unconscionable that Rove and the administration would attempt to divert the nation’s attention from more immediately important issues by stirring up fear and prejudice.

  Posted by sms on Feb 9, 2004 at 7:49 PM

  What else would you expect from these lying bunch of looters of the the public domain and the planet’s resources, not to mention the attempt to destroy the separation of church and state.  If Bush wants to find evil in the world he need not look far.
  Rove and the GOP appear to be masters of this sort of divisive “wedge politics”.  The trouble with the Democrats appears to be the way they present their cause.  It has worked poorly in most elections.  YOu have to counter their smears, distractions with truth and relevance.  The focus needs to be on the mishandling of Iraq, lies, incompetence, crony capitalism, etc.  If the Democrats let them get away with this it will be their own fault.
  

  Posted by Lee Miller on Feb 9, 2004 at 11:20 PM

  Do people honestly believe that the biggest threat to the American nation is being committed in the bedroom between two consenting adults?  Wait...do Bush and Ashcroft plan in a bedroom?  If so, I take it all back, the biggest threat to America is being committed between two consenting adults, perhaps in the Lincoln bedroom.
  To paraphrase George Carlin, you’d think a group of anti-abortion conservatives and homosexuals would make natural allies, who has less abortions than homosexuals?

  Posted by Nate Harris on Feb 10, 2004 at 7:17 AM

  So you think that an elected official who stands by viewpoint he supported in order to be elected rather than allowing personal, familial circumstances to sway that espoused viewpoint is “primarily concerned with their own biases and prejudices rather than the best interests of the nation.”?

  Got to tell you, seems just the opposite to me.

  Posted by Nus on Feb 10, 2004 at 2:52 PM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 10 posts.

Also featured Weapon of Mass Distraction
Locker Room Politics
Two Little Words

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!