Culture » November 25, 2009

Assassinated by the State

The federally sanctioned murder of a Black Panther.

By Salim Muwakkil

Street door to the Black Panthers’ headquarters after the October 1969 police raid (Photo courtesy of Paul Sequeria )

It’s clear that Hoover’s designation of the Panthers as ‘the greatest threat to the internal security of the country’ provided law enforcement with a virtual license to kill.

Jeffrey Haas tells a story that many of us have long waited to read. His book, The Assassination of Fred Hampton: How the FBI and the Chicago Police Murdered a Black Panther (Lawrence Hill Books, November), is a much-needed corrective to a badly distorted mainstream narrative of a key event in the history of the left and African-American politics of the late ’60s. Haas reveals just how deeply the Nixon Justice Department was involved in the Chicago police raid on December 4, 1969, that killed Black Panther Party leaders Fred Hampton and Mark Clark. Hampton headed the Panthers’ Chicago branch and Clark the Peoria, Ill., branch.

It is now clear that Hampton and Clark were victims of a plot hatched by the FBI and executed by the Cook County State’s Attorney and Chicago police officers. Nonetheless, conventional wisdom portrays the Panthers as the villains. In 2006, Chicago’s City Council, under pressure from the Fraternal Order of Police, voted down a routine city ordinance to name the block on which Hampton’s murder took place in his honor.

The accumulation of facts presented in Haas’ book portrays Chicago police as all too willing to violate the constitutional rights of Panther members and supporters. He reveals the cynical treachery of State Attorney Edward Hanrahan, whose office planned the raid under the direction of J. Edgar Hoover’s Counterintelligence Program (COINTELPRO). Haas also provides a damning portrayal of one obstinate judge’s continued attempts to thwart the legal process.

But Haas also offers captivating details that add color and context to those turbulent times. He evokes the infectious spirit of change and activism that infused so many idealistic young Americans during the hallowed ’60s. His accounts of growing up Jewish and middle-class in Atlanta, Ga., help locate the source of his unconventional political leanings. Haas’ grandfather, for example, was an attorney for Leo Frank, a Jewish factory owner who was lynched in Georgia after being wrongly accused of murdering a teenage girl. His father was deeply involved in the civil rights movement in the South. Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), an icon of that movement, wrote the eulogy for his father’s funeral.

Haas’ forebears held radical positions for Southern whites, and it seems Haas was simply following ancestral footsteps when he aligned himself with the emergent black radical movement of the 1960s. Although many thought it unusual for an attorney with University of Chicago credentials to eschew wealth and status to associate with black radicals, it was a natural move for Haas.

His accounts of the life at the U of C law school, where he met a “persuasive” Bernardine Dohrn, who would become the leader of the Weathermen faction of Students for a Democratic Society, evoke a period infused with political passions. At that time, Dohrn chaired a group that sent law students to the South for summer jobs with civil rights lawyers. Haas was sent to his home, Atlanta.

“I had to go to Chicago to take my first steps to confront segregation where I grew up,” he writes. Though easily parodied, the earnest idealism of those days provoked real change. Haas’ volume reminds us how important naïve and optimistic students were to toppling barriers of segregation in the South.

Back in Chicago, after passing the bar and while defending suspects arrested during the violence that erupted following the 1968 assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Haas met a like-minded attorney named Dennis Cunningham. They formed a friendship and partnership, and in 1969 they joined with two other lawyers to open the People’s Law Office, which has since gained an international reputation for conscientiously defending victims of overzealous law enforcement.

Haas also provides some historical context for the rise of the Black Panther Party, a group started in 1966 by college students Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale to address issues of police brutality in their hometown of Oakland, Calif. Seale and Newton decided to form an organization of armed volunteers to confront abusive police officers directly. At the time, it was still legal to brandish unconcealed weapons in California.

The idea that African-Americans could physically resist police mistreatment was very attractive to urban black youth of that era. I was one of them. And, like me, many had grown weary of watching nonviolent protesters for civil rights endure humiliating beatings at the hands of police.

The Black Panther Party’s disciplined audacity offered black youth an alternative that resonated with the militant tenor of the times. Although the group embraced a quasi-Marxist ideology and provocatively challenged police authority, it spread like wildfire—mostly in the urban north. Their urgent sense of commitment to social justice permanently altered the street-gang culture of urban America.

The first Panther office opened in Chicago in November 1968. Fred Hampton, a charismatic 20-year-old who formerly led the Maywood, Ill., NAACP youth chapter, was given the leadership role by Bobby Rush, now an Illinois congressman, but then the Defense Minister of the Illinois Black Panthers. Haas gives us one of the few accounts of Hampton’s life outside of his connection to the Panthers. Hampton grew up in Chicago’s southern suburbs, the third child of Louisiana immigrants Francis and Iberia Hampton.

The true strength of this book is Haas’ meticulous reconstruction of the particulars that led to the partial victory (the plaintiffs received a $1.85 million settlement, although the government admitted no wrongdoing) and legal vindication of the People’s Law Office. He details how the FBI, the Cook County State’s Attorney’s office and the Chicago police conspired to assassinate Fred Hampton and Mark Clark. He clearly reveals, for example, how COINTELPRO, which sought to “neutralize” black leaders, provided motivation for the Hampton murder. The book’s exhaustive account of this incident is one of the few investigations to explore the Hampton assassination. This is odd because many strands of U.S. history converge at this point. The FBI’s COINTELPRO program, uncovered in 1973 by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, chaired by Idaho Senator Frank Church, sought to “prevent the rise of a messiah who could unify and electrify the militant Black Nationalist movement.” That FBI directive helps us understand just how deeply the federal government feared the Black Panthers and someone like Fred Hampton. A popular leader with great potential, Hampton embodied the electrifying appeal of the Black Panther Party among a certain segment of black youth.

In retrospect, it’s clear that Hoover’s designation of the Panthers as “the greatest threat to the internal security of the country” provided law enforcement with a virtual license to kill. What’s more, the reckless bravado of the Panthers often provided police a convenient pretext.

Haas’ important book clarifies how the racial paranoia of an out-of-touch federal government produced a deceitful policy that trashed constitutional rights even as it ignored legitimate grievances.

This book should alter the conventional wisdom that the Panthers were a dangerous threat that the police had to eliminate at all costs. Haas reveals that the cost was much too high.

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  So, what if the government was color-blind genetically but not politically?  After all, millions of blacks (and whites, and browns, and yellows) were not targeted by the police or FBI, only those that were red politically, or otherwise criminal, regardless of their skin color.

  And you admit this in the small print (quasi-Marxist).  You might have pointed out that Dohrn and the Weathermen were terrorists and killers as were some of the Black Panthers, but that would have destroyed the premise of the article; all these innocent young terrorists were attacked by the nasty old police, who were, after all, required to protect us from terrorists. 

  Marxists are killer when they achieve power.  But I am not a kulak, so don’t tread on me.

  Posted by scorp on Nov 26, 2009 at 7:41 AM

  First off, tell me who the Weatherman killed. They killed no one. All their bombings—except for the one in which they blew themselves up—destroyed only property. Terrorists, maybe. Killers, no. Who did the Black Panthers murder? Specifically Hampton, who did he kill? Nobody. And Marxists may have a bad history with violence, but being a Marxist isn’t a crime. Therefore, your logic still doesn’t justify the government’s actions.

  Posted by kilgoretrout9835 on Nov 26, 2009 at 7:33 PM

  Scorp, you said that “Marxists are killer[s], when they achieve power…”

  You single out Marxists for some reason. Most people, no matter their political creed, religion, nationality, race, or pizza topping preference…most people are killers when they achieve power. It’s part and parcel of the system. We, the people, suck it up and tell ourselves this is simply how it is.

  But you wouldn’t know this, apparently, too fixated on red-baiting as you are.

  Far be it from any citizen to hold any of our own power-wielders in these USA above suspicion, eh?

  Posted by Hugh Kunsang on Nov 29, 2009 at 4:20 AM

  Weathermen members Kathy Boudin, Judith Alice Clark, and David Gilbert attempted to rob a Brinks truck and killed two policemen and a guard, they were sent up to long prison sentences.  But the low death rate from Weathermen bombings was mostly due to the Weathermens’ stumblefart incompetence, such as the Greenwich Village accident. 

  “Off the cops” was not just a saying with the Black Panthers.  Dozens of Panthers died fighting the police, and a number of police, innocent victims of Black Panther crimes, and Black Panthers, victims of internecine warfare, died, mostly in the 1960s and 1970s.

  Black Panther H. Rap Brown is serving life in prison for the murder of one Black policeman and for wounding another Black policeman. Black Panthers Warren Kimbro, George Sams, Jr., and Lonnie McLucas admitted to torturing and murdering 19-year-old Black Panther Alex Rackley because he was suspected of being a police informant. Sams testified that Black Panther Bobby Seale had given the orders to kill Rackley. 

  And Marxists may have a bad history with violence, but being a Marxist isn’t a crime.

  There has never, ever been a criminal proceeding against anyone in the United States for being a Marxist, because beliefs, however idiotic, are not crimes and are not prosecuted..  All the Weathermen and Black Panthers that were sent to prison were convicted of violent crimes.

  Posted by scorp on Nov 30, 2009 at 3:37 AM

  scorp,

  You’re very good at misconstruing the facts. The three Weathermen members you named robbed the bank after the Weathermen had broken up. They were with a different group. It doesn’t justify what they did ,but it certainly doesn’t implicate Dohrn in murder as you said earlier. H. Rap Brown murdered the police officer in the 2000s,  well after the murder of Fred Hampton (and well after the Black Panthers had any significance).

  I was unaware of the torture/murder. Nobody’s justifying that. It’s actually pretty horrible, and they’ were rightfully sent to prison.

  However, you still haven’t offered any legitimate reason for the police to go into Hampton’s house guns blazing. Yes, the ones sent to prison were sent for violent crimes, but what did Hampton do to deserve being murdered?

  Posted by kilgoretrout9835 on Nov 30, 2009 at 4:16 AM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also featured INSIDE CUBA: Mystery Island
INSIDE CUBA: A Day in My Life (Any Day)
INSIDE CUBA: Gay Life in Cuba

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by Salim Muwakkil

• The ‘Post-Racial’ President
  Barack Obama navigates a world where color still matters. Posted on August 24, 2009
• Government-Assisted Terrorists
  On May 20, federal and New York City authorities arrested four men on… morePosted on June 16, 2009
• The Irony of Obama’s Boycott
  America's first black president refused to attend a U.N. conference on racism.Posted on April 30, 2009
• African-Americans Back Burris
  The African-American community's unified efforts to retain Roland Burris as the lone black… morePosted on March 26, 2009
• Will Holder Hold Cops Accountable?
  Eric Holder, the first African-American attorney general, takes over a Department of Justice… morePosted on February 26, 2009