Some Policies Don’t Change

BY Leonard C. Goodman

Like Bush, Obama claims the right to perpetually detain any person deemed to be a threat without interference from the courts.

Obama has changed the rhetoric of the Bush Administration. Unfortunately, he has not changed the destructive policies that continue to make us less safe and that increase the likelihood of future terror attacks. Like Bush, Obama claims the right to perpetually detain any person deemed to be a threat without interference from the courts. Obama is simultaneously carrying on the Bush policy of incinerating any person deemed a threat by drone or air-strike. (Indeed, our CIA is presently conducting an undeclared war on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border–a war that is claiming an untold number of civilian casualties.)

In response to 9/11, the Bush Administration rounded up about 600 Muslim men and sent them to an off-shore prison camp for years of isolation and harsh interrogation. The location of this camp, at Guantanamo Bay Naval Station, Cuba, was chosen because the Bush Administration lawyers believed it to be outside the reach of the U.S. courts.

For seven years, the Bush lawyers fought to keep the detainees’ cases out of the courts and out of the press by making the false claim that to do otherwise would jeopardize our national security. Sadly, the Obama lawyers have carried on this misguided and destructive policy. For example, to avoid discovery deadlines and evidentiary hearings, Department of Justice lawyers continue to employ the tactic of moving to “stay” all court proceedings based upon the mere promise to transfer the detainee out of Gitmo at some unspecified date in the future.

More than 90 percent of the Gitmo detainees (including my client, Shawali Khan) were captured by foreigners and turned over to the United States, often in exchange for well-publicized cash rewards. In other words, most of the detainees were sent to Gitmo because some foreign warlord or bounty hunter told our intelligence officials, stationed in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan, that the prisoner was Taliban or al Qaeda. In many cases, including in the case of my client, the U.S. officials merely accepted the word of the informant without demanding any corroborating evidence.

Approximately 400 detainees have been released from Gitmo, nearly all of them as a result of secret, back channel negotiations with their home countries rather than by any judicial process. Some released detainees have joined anti-U.S. terror groups. However, because no court has ever looked at their cases, it is impossible to say whether these men were terrorists at the time they were sent off to Gitmo or whether they were innocent men who learned to hate the United States after years of unjust incarceration and harsh interrogation. These are important questions that must be answered if we can ever hope to learn from our mistakes.

When the day finally comes that the veil of secrecy is lifted from the Gitmo files, the American people will learn that our nation’s experiment in lawlessness was an abject failure. We forfeited our reputation as a leader of civilized nations and in return gained no useful intelligence about any future plots on our homeland. The sooner the Obama administration stops asserting false claims of “national security” and lawless doctrines like “preventative detention” to bury these mistakes, the sooner we can begin to repair our great nation’s reputation and put this sad chapter behind us.

Leonard Goodman is a Chicago criminal defense lawyer and Adjunct Professor of Law at DePaul University.

More information about Leonard C. Goodman

  • Reader Comments

    Perhaps the basic problem with these POWs is that rather than a group on enemy combatants captured by our own soldiers, we allowed Iraqis to hand over many who they caught.  We have little way of knowing whose enemies they truly were, but after detention we can safely assume they are now our enemies.

    “Obama claims the right to perpetually detain any person deemed to be a threat without interference from the courts.”

    In all wars prior to Viet Nam combatants captured while out of uniform were simply shot by both sides.

    Today in the Middle East, our opposition shoots and tortures our soldiers in uniform and we treat their people as we would American citizens charged with a simple felony.

    Life gets more complex, though not necessarily more sensible.  It becomes increasingly difficult to know who is Commander in Chief of which side.

    With Obama acting as an agent for the US, we need a new score card.

    Posted by whattheheck on Feb 24, 2010 at 8:13 AM

    You are right. Both presidents seem to lead the same policy what concerns terrorism. I liked the film Zeitgeist a lot. I downloaded it at shared files SE http://www.sharedshares.com . The problem of terrorism was analysed there. Well, it is a pity that on the accuse of terrorism all people become naked before the government.

    Posted by Rain Sanders on Oct 21, 2010 at 8:28 AM

    You are right. Both presidents seem to lead the same policy what concerns terrorism. I liked the film Zeitgeist a lot. I downloaded it at shared files SE <a > http://www.sharedshares.com </a> http://www.sharedshares.com . The problem of terrorism was analysed there. Well, it is a pity that on the accuse of terrorism all people become naked before the government.

    Posted by Rain Sanders on Oct 21, 2010 at 8:29 AM

    I went back and forth on whether or not to comment on this topic. I love these juicy, argumentative subjects that get posted on blogs that are begging for crazy comments. I honestly loved Bush as a president. Some people think he made some mistakes, other think he did a lot with a wild and crazy economic and political onset. I personally, think he did great with what he was handed. Now, let’s change the subject to Patio dining sets  because a lot of people are going to hate the fact that I can’t stand what Obama has done with our small business outlook. Socialism sucks.

    Posted by ChrissyMadeline on Dec 2, 2010 at 8:58 AM

    Some policies will never change, that’s what personal and business agendas do to government and public policy. The media and tv outlets have molded the public into something that is completely in their favor and does not fit the masses. Can’t wait for the next election.

    Posted by Susan Katrob on Dec 15, 2010 at 9:22 AM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 6 posts.