North Park University

North Park University's Nyvall Hall, in Chicago's North Park neighborhood. (Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons)

An Assault on Academic Freedom?

Students say an evangelical university in Chicago showed a professor the door because of his views on Palestine and the Christian right.

BY Sara Peck

Hundreds of letters began pouring into North Park President David Parkyn's office from students and donors asking why Wagner had been fired.

CHICAGO–As North Park University students returned home for summer break last year, many of them heard a disturbing piece of gossip: Don Wagner, a popular Middle-Eastern studies professor, would be fired the following year–in May 2010–after teaching at the Chicago school for 15 years. Rumors circulated that the decision, made without any student input, was due to his outspoken views on Palestine and Israel.

An activist for Palestinian human rights, Wagner, director of North Park’s Center for Middle Eastern Studies (CMES), was popular with students but controversial within the evangelical Christian university’s larger community. School administrators have cited financial pressures as the reason for Wagner’s departure, but from the beginning many students–and some faculty members–believe his position was eliminated because of his political views.

In a June 2009 e-mail, students learned that CMES, founded by Wagner in 1995, would be absorbed into a “collaboratory” beginning in the fall. The new entity, a one-stop-shop of sorts for North Park’s cultural centers’–including centers for African-American, Korean, Scandinavian and Middle Eastern studies–would employ “faculty fellows,” rather than directors of centers. Wagner, who became a fellow at the “collaboratory” for the 2009-10 academic year and no longer works at the school, declined an interview with In These Times.

Student leaders and faculty members started a petition—which eventually had more than 500 signatures, including some from members of North Park’s board of trustees—to rehire Wagner as an adjunct professor. But on May 18, after negotiations with faculty members, North Park announced that it would not rehire Wagner. Spanish Professor Cherie Meacham helped lead the push to rehire Wagner, and wrote in an e-mail to In These Times that North Park alumni agreed to fund Wagner’s salary, but President David Parkyn and other administrators declined to hire him.

“The faculty and students who have done everything possible over the last year to avoid this outcome are in a state of mourning,” Meachman wrote. “We have lost the presence of a gifted colleague, professor, mentor and friend who in every way epitomizes our best efforts toward being a truly multicultural, urban and Christian campus.”

Parkyn did not respond to requests for a comment on why Wagner was not rehired. An adjunct professor has been contracted to teach Middle Eastern studies, Meacham says. (As of late May there were no Middle Eastern studies classes open for registration for the Fall 2010 semester.)

North Park is the only evangelical Christian university in the United States with a center for Middle Eastern studies; the fact that its director questioned the United States’ alliance with Israel made it all the more unusual. As director, Wagner organized lectures, taught classes and brought one Palestinian student to North Park each year, says Lukas Dahlstrom, a former vice president of North Park’s student association. Wagner’s books include Anxious for Armageddon and Dying in the Land of Promise: Palestine and Palestinian Christianity from Pentecost to 2000.

In a 2003 article titled “The Evangelical-Jewish Alliance,” originally published in the journal The Christian Century and available at Religion-Online.org, Wagner wrote that “[m]uslims and other non-Jewish religious minorities in the U.S. have no standing with the Christian right; indeed, Christian Zionists are openly hostile toward Islam.” He criticized the Christian right for pro-Israel views loosely rooted in scripture.

Students say Wagner has paid for his outspokenness before. Five years ago, he was not awarded tenure, a decision many of his students say was related to his political views. (Parkyn wrote in an e-mail to In These Times that he “was not at North Park during that time and does not have a good handle on the details which surrounded that process.”)

Katie Cavallo, a student of Wagner’s who graduated from North Park this month, decided to challenge Wagner’s impending departure. In May 2009 she created a Facebook group called “Help Keep Don Wagner at North Park!” which quickly grew. Eve Adams, a former student of Wagner’s who is Jewish, wrote on Facebook in support of the academic: “As one of about a dozen Jews who have ever attended North Park, I found myself in distinct disagreement with Dr. Wagner in just about every classroom setting–and I have the utmost respect for him and his opinions.”

Hundreds of letters began pouring into Parkyn’s office from students and donors asking why Wagner had been fired, and why CMES was effectively being dissolved. Throughout the entire process, according to each student interviewed for this article, no one within the administration would say more than that Wagner’s firing was due to “financial” reasons.

Next page »Page 1 of 2

Sara Peck, a spring 2010 In These Times editorial intern, is a Northwestern University student studying journalism and political science.

More information about Sara Peck

  • Reader Comments

    As a North Park student, and as someone who has engaged with the administration on a related topic (namely, the future of our Global Studies curriculum when we lack a full-time faculty member in Middle Eastern studies), I think the issue at stake could be framed differently.

    I am skeptical that anyone in the present administration wants to suppress Wagner’s views. It’s possible, but unprofessional and lacks evidence. Besides, other professors in our occasionally left-leaning institution hold similar views and their positions are not under threat. (Also, President Parkyn isn’t the only one to “blame,” Provost Jones and Diversity Dean Lindsay were also involved with this decision.)

    To me, it is more probable that Wagner represents such a bizarre niche (Middle Eastern studies in an Evangelical context that do not follow Christian Zionist rhetoric) that while are intellectually honest (and probably true), are not academically mainstream and therefore struggle to attract donors or bring credibility to the university. From the big picture standpoint of the administration, this is a tough pill to swallow, although it should be.

    I commend In These Times and Sara Peck for adding to the pressure students have already been giving our administration as we continue to struggle together towards realizing the unique vision of our university.

    Posted by Kaleb Nyquist on May 14, 2010 at 5:19 PM

    I have heard of Don Wagner. He is a noted expert on the issue of the history of Christian Zionism, an important and fascinating issue which needs further study, especially now. It is a shame that the same reactionary, politically motivated bunch are once again threatening academic freedom. I am a Jew with Israeli citizenship and I’m frankly sick and tired of right wing zionists, whether Christian or Jewish, attacking academic freedom. There is nothing offensive about Wagner’s academic pursuits nor his views.

    Finkelstein, an excellent writer and effective teacher, was denied tenure at De Paul less for his views on Israel than his book entitled, The Holocaust Industry, a title most Jews, and possibly others, found offensive in and of itself. The idea that Jews exploit the Holocaust for revenue and political advantage is offensive and probably untrue. The Holocaust is the real reason Israel exists today. Had this not occured, there would probably be no State of Israel.

    What gave further impetus to the establishment of the Jewish State was what occured after the Holocaust between 1945 and 1948; not only were their continuing pogroms in Poland, taking hundreds of lives, but over a quarter million Jews were left stranded in DP camps in Allied Occupied Europe with no country willing to open their doors to them after the general European displaced persons issue was all but resolved. This obviously drove home the point regarding the need for the Jews to have a state of their own.

    Finkelstein’s contentions are ahistorical, silly and offensive and yet he sees this work as more important than his writings on the Israel/Palestine conflict itself. I believe this is why he was denied tenure. Still, academic freedom should be protected. The case of Arthur Butz, however, is different. Unlike Wagner and Finkelstein, Butz should have been fired. He is motivated purely by hate and not a desire to seek truth. He has made this clear with anti-semitic inuendo and prejudiced statements quite aside from his Holocaust denial. And as the saying goes, You’re entitled to your own opinion but you’re not entitled to your own facts. As far as the historical record has overwhelmingly shown, Butz is more interested than his own set of facts than the actual historical facts. Unfortunately, he still retains his teaching post.

    I just want to conclude by saying that attacks on academic freedom are generally deplorable in a free society and that such continued attacks make it difficult to remove people like Butz who actually should be removed. An thorough examination of the details of each of the three above cases of the academic freedom question clearly proves this contention.

    Posted by cabdriverinchicago on May 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM

    just to be fair, you are still free to say anything as long as its right wing, and socially conservative.

    Posted by 英雄本色 on May 29, 2010 at 5:05 AM
  • Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account